<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - This Week</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/this_week</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: This Week</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Conservative media react to talk of Obama-led economic recovery by attacking FDR and New Deal</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811260002</link>
<description>In recent weeks, several conservative media figures, echoed by Republican lawmakers, have responded to comparisons in the media of President-elect Barack Obama to FDR, or assertions in the media that a New Deal-level of government intervention will be necessary to resolve the current economic crisis, by asserting that the New Deal was a dismal failure, plunging the 1930s economy into a depression, an assertion that prominent progressive economists flatly reject.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811260002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:07:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC falsely said McCain has never brought up Ayers, suggested McCain is separate from his campaign</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808260020</link>
<description>ABCNews.com falsely asserted that an Obama campaign ad questioning why Sen. John McCain is &#x22;trying to link [Sen.] Barack Obama to radical Bill Ayers&#x22; is &#x22;incorrect in insinuating that John McCain himself has brought up Ayers,&#x22; adding, &#x22;[I]t is in fact McCain&#x27;s campaign that has sought to use the Ayers association against Obama.&#x22; In fact, McCain himself brought up Ayers unprompted during an April interview on ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;. Further, ABCNews.com gave no indication that McCain has repudiated or in any way distanced himself from his aides&#x27; comments linking Ayers to Obama.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808260020</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:06:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s King, Blitzer selectively cited poll showing less support for Obama among Clinton backers</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808240006</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Late Edition&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Wolf Blitzer and John King both cited an August 15-18 &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/NBC News poll in which 52 percent of Sen. Hillary Clinton&#x27;s supporters said they will support Sen. Barack Obama, but neither noted &#x3C;strong&#x3E;&#x3C;strong&#x3E;that&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;&#x3C;/strong&#x3E; an August 19-22 &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/ABC News poll found that 70 percent of Clinton supporters &#x22;back Obama,&#x22; according to the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;em&#x3E;.&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808240006</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:12:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported McCain&#x27;s criticism of Obama plan without noting McCain recently said 16 months is &#x22;a pretty good timetable&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807280006</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that during an interview on &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Sen. John McCain criticized Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;for proposing to withdraw American forces from Iraq within 16 months,&#x22; but did not mention that only days earlier, McCain told CNN&#x27;s Wolf Blitzer that 16 months is &#x22;a pretty good timetable.&#x22; The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; not only failed to mention McCain&#x27;s comment about a timetable, it did not report that McCain denied having used the word &#x22;timetable&#x22; when asked about it by George Stephanopoulos.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807280006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:44:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Huffington confronted Hewitt about Ohio State-USC football game comment  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030008</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Hugh Hewitt claimed that a comment he made during the June 25 edition of his show -- that the September 13 Ohio State-USC football game will &#x22;probably [be] the last football game we&#x27;ll ever get to see before the United States gets blown up by the Islamists under Obama&#x22; -- was distorted by Arianna Huffington.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807030008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:13:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stephanopoulos did not challenge Graham&#x27;s false suggestion that Obama &#x22;borrow[ed] money from&#x22; Rezko &#x22;to build his house&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806080002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, George Stephanopoulos did not challenge Sen. Lindsey Graham&#x27;s false suggestion that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;borrow[ed] money&#x22; from Antoin &#x22;Tony&#x22; Rezko &#x22;to build his house.&#x22; In fact, the Obamas established a land trust to purchase the property and took out a $1.32 million mortgage on the home, financed through the Northern Trust Co. And the Obamas did not &#x22;build&#x22; the house -- they purchased an existing home.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806080002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jun 2008 15:14:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week &#x3C;/em&#x3E;yet to correct Will&#x27;s Social Security falsehood  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805210007</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has corrected George Will&#x27;s false assertion in his &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column that Social Security taxes are levied based on household income. Will made the same assertion on ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, but ABC has yet to issue a correction on the show.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805210007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:32:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In criticizing Obama, Will falsely claimed that Social Security taxes are levied on household income  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805020007</link>
<description>In his &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, George Will falsely claimed that Social Security taxes are levied on household income. He had similarly falsely asserted on ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week &#x3C;/em&#x3E;that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;wants to raise taxes on a lot of people, beginning with those earning about $100,000 a year, a household.&#x22; In fact, Social Security taxes are levied based on individual income, and contrary to his assertion in &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, a married couple with each spouse making less than $102,000 would not face a payroll tax increase if the income cap was raised, even if combined they made more than the current cap.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805020007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 May 2008 19:09:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stephanopoulos left unchallenged McCain&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;every time you have cut capital gains taxes, revenues have increased&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804220005</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s George Stephanopoulos did not challenge Sen. John McCain&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;history shows every time you have cut capital gains taxes, revenues have increased -- going back to Jack Kennedy.&#x22; Stephanopoulos did not note that, notwithstanding a potential short-term revenue increase, many economists have challenged the claim that revenue goes up over the long term as a result of capital gains tax rates being cut.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804220005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:17:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stephanopoulos failed to confront McCain with controversial Coburn remark that Obama cited when questioned about Ayers    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804220001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Sen. John McCain asserted that Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s reference to Sen. Tom Coburn when Obama was asked about William Ayers was an &#x22;incredible statement&#x22; that &#x22;borders on outrageous.&#x22; However, at no point during the exchange did George Stephanopoulos point out the actual comments Coburn made that elicited Obama&#x27;s reference to Coburn, much less confront McCain with the issue of whether he agreed with Coburn&#x27;s comments.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804220001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:34:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citing Gingrich, Halperin falsely suggested Obama&#x27;s &#x22;[t]alk to your enemies&#x22; position includes support for meeting with Hamas  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804130001</link>
<description>Discussing on ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E; former President Jimmy Carter&#x27;s planned meeting with a Hamas leader and the &#x22;two schools of thought about how America should deal in the world,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Time&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; magazine senior political analyst Mark Halperin -- citing former House Speaker Newt Gingrich --  said of Sen. Barack Obama: &#x22;Obama&#x27;s position: Talk to your enemies.&#x22; But Halperin did not mention that Obama has repeatedly said his willingness to meet with international adversaries &#x22;does not include Hamas.&#x22;  &#x3C;strong&#x3E;&#x3C;br /&#x3E;
&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804130001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:34:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Discussing &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/CBS poll, Cokie Roberts, Reuters&#x27; Decker claimed McCain is ahead of, or even with, Obama, Clinton -- poll says otherwise  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804070009</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, while discussing the latest &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;/CBS News poll, Cokie Roberts asserted that Sen. John McCain is &#x22;even or winning in the polls.&#x22; On &#x3C;em&#x3E;MSNBC Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Reuters&#x27; Jon Decker similarly stated that McCain is &#x22;running either ahead of both&#x22; Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama &#x22;or running even with both of them.&#x22; But neither Roberts nor Decker mentioned that in that same poll, both Clinton and Obama beat McCain in hypothetical head-to-head match-ups.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804070009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:26:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring McCain&#x27;s reversal, Stephanopoulos let Lieberman claim McCain &#x22;was much more forward-leaning on immigration reform&#x22; than Clinton, Obama  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803300001</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week,&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman claimed that Sen. John McCain &#x22;actually stepped out and was much more forward-leaning on immigration reform than Barack Obama was -- Senator Clinton wasn&#x27;t involved in those negotiations.&#x22; Host George Stephanopoulos did not point out that McCain abandoned his previous support for comprehensive immigration legislation during his campaign for the Republican nomination.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803300001</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 16:01:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citing his experience, &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week, Fox News Sunday&#x3C;/em&#x3E; panelists excuse McCain&#x27;s Al Qaeda-Iran gaffe  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803230003</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s George Will asserted that Sen. John McCain&#x27;s admittedly false claim that Iran is training Al Qaeda is &#x22;[n]ot damaging at all&#x22; to McCain, &#x22;because people say it&#x27;s a given that this man knows what he&#x27;s talking about.&#x22; Similarly, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Chicago Tribune&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Jill Zuckman asserted that &#x22;I don&#x27;t think many people believe&#x22; &#x22;the argument that McCain doesn&#x27;t know what he&#x27;s talking about when it comes to foreign policy.&#x22; But neither Will nor Zuckman noted that McCain has made that error more than once.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803230003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:42:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, George Will falsely asserted that &#x22;in the primaries,&#x22; McCain &#x22;has achieved more independent voters than Obama&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802190010</link>
<description>On ABC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;This Week, &#x3C;/em&#x3E;George Will falsely asserted that &#x22;in the primaries,&#x22; Sen. John McCain &#x22;has achieved more independent voters than [Sen. Barack] Obama.&#x22; In fact, in calculations based on exit polls, in each of the nine states that have held open or semi-open primaries contested by both Obama and McCain, Obama received more votes from voters who identified themselves as &#x22;independent&#x22; than McCain.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802190010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:20:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>