<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - The Drudge Report</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/the_drudge_report</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: The Drudge Report</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x27;08 SHOCK: Drudge still smearing, distorting quotes, and touting fake allegations</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811040016</link>
<description>Media critics have recently postulated that while Matt Drudge may have once set the media&#x27;s agenda, his influence has waned and his efforts to inject himself in the media&#x27;s coverage of the presidential election have largely fallen flat. This election season, Drudge has posted a long series of items that were false on their face or turned out to be false, making the strong case that, if his influence is not in fact waning, it should be.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811040016</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:12:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scarborough falsely claimed Obama said the Warren Court was &#x22;not, quote, &#x27;radical enough&#x27; &#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810280021</link>
<description>Joe Scarborough falsely claimed that, during a 2001 radio interview, Sen. Barack Obama said that &#x22;the Warren Court was not, quote, &#x27;radical enough.&#x27; &#x22; In fact, Obama didn&#x27;t say the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren was not &#x22;radical enough.&#x22; Scarborough also falsely claimed that during the interview Obama said &#x22;the Warren Court did not go far enough, that actually one of the great tragedies was there was no redistribution of wealth.&#x22; In fact, the &#x22;traged[y]&#x22; Obama identified during the interview was that the civil rights movement relied too much on the courts in its efforts to bring about political and economic justice.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810280021</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:19:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoing Drudge, Fox News on-screen text flat wrong about Obama&#x27;s comments on Supreme Court</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810270008</link>
<description>On-screen text on Fox News echoed the Drudge Report in falsely claiming that Sen. Barack Obama said it is a &#x22;tragedy&#x22; that the Supreme Court has not addressed wealth redistribution. In fact, the &#x22;tragedy&#x22; Obama identified during the interview was in what he said was the civil rights movement&#x27;s overreliance on the courts to pursue political and economic justice.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810270008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:47:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Selectively citing Gallup poll&#x27;s findings, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; joined Drudge Report in touting &#x22;Gallup shock&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810170015</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe &#x3C;/em&#x3E;echoed the Drudge Report by displaying the on-screen text &#x22;Gallup shock&#x22; and selectively citing only one of three findings from an October 13-15 Gallup daily tracking poll of the presidential race -- the one that showed Sen. Barack Obama holding his smallest lead over Sen. John McCain.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810170015</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:48:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge, Lowry revived falsehood that Obama didn&#x27;t vote to condemn MoveOn Petraeus ad  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010003</link>
<description>The Drudge Report and the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Review&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Rich Lowry falsely claimed that Sen. Barack Obama didn&#x27;t vote to condemn MoveOn.org&#x27;s 2007 newspaper advertisement critical of Gen. David Petraeus. In fact, Obama did vote for an amendment by Sen. Barbara Boxer that condemned the ad, as well as other attacks on past and present members of the armed forces, as the &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; blog post to which the Drudge Report linked points out.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Jul 2008 14:29:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge headline distorted Clinton comments to suggest she said &#x22;Obama Not Muslim &#x27;As Far As I Know&#x27; ... &#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030004</link>
<description>A Drudge Report headline linking to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;60 Minutes&#x3C;/em&#x3E; interview of Sen. Hillary Clinton read, &#x22;Hillary: Obama Not Muslim &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x27;As Far As I Know&#x27; ...,&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x22; falsely suggesting that Clinton characterized the issue of Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s religion as unresolved. In fact, she did the opposite.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803030004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 3 Mar 2008 14:33:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citing Drudge headline, MSNBC&#x27;s Brewer suggested Latinos would react negatively to Clinton campaign change  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110007</link>
<description>While discussing the news that Sen. Hillary Clinton had replaced her campaign manager, MSNBC&#x27;s Contessa Brewer asked Kathleen Kennedy Townsend: &#x22;[T]he Drudge Report has a headline that reads, quote, &#x27;Adi&#x26;oacute;s: Clinton&#x27;s Top Latina Sidelined.&#x27; Are you concerned at all about the way Hispanic voters might interpret this shakeup heading into Texas?&#x22; Neither the Drudge Report nor MSNBC offered any reason why Solis Doyle&#x27;s replacement as campaign manager might have anything to do with her being Latina or any reason why Latino voters might react in any way to the staff change.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:03:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Tapper falsely  suggested Bill Clinton proposed &#x22;slow[ing] down our economy&#x22; to fight climate  change  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801310009</link>
<description>In a blog post, ABC News&#x27; Jake Tapper wrote: &#x22;In a long, and interesting speech,  [Bill Clinton] characterized what the U.S. and other industrialized nations need  to do to combat global warming this way: &#x27;We just have to slow down our economy  and cut back our greenhouse gas emissions &#x27;cause we have to save the planet for  our grandchildren.&#x27; &#x22; But Clinton did not say that is what has to be done to combat global  warming.   </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801310009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:24:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge headline  baselessly implicated Clinton in closure of  Niagara Falls  children&#x27;s psychiatric unit   </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801220010</link>
<description>A January 22 headline on the Drudge Report baselessly suggested that the  children&#x27;s psychiatric unit at Niagara  Falls Memorial  Medical Center closed because Sen. Hillary Clinton was  &#x22;neglecting&#x22; New  York. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Buffalo  News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article that the headline linked to contained no mention of  Clinton; rather, it reported that hospital officials attributed the closure to  problems surrounding the way Medicaid is administered by Niagara County.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801220010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:53:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Hill&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on  McCain&#x27;s response to &#x22;bitch&#x22; question ignored &#x22;excellent question&#x22;  remark</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711150004</link>
<description>In an article about a report from CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Out 
in the Open&#x3C;/em&#x3E; on Sen. John McCain&#x27;s recent exchange with a supporter in 
Hilton Head, South Carolina, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The 
Hill&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that McCain&#x27;s &#x22;campaign laments that CNN portrayed the 
event as though McCain did not defend [Sen. Hillary] Clinton forcefully enough. 
The senator, in the short video clip, expressed his respect for the former first 
lady.&#x22; But the article did not note that McCain described the question -- &#x22;How 
do we beat the bitch?&#x22; -- as &#x22;excellent.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711150004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:24:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s The Note, NBC&#x27;s First Read, Drudge Report, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen continue to  highlight &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x27;s  &#x3C;/em&#x3E;false  assertion on Dem Iraq  bills</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711130003</link>
<description>Despite the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s correction 
of its claim that Democrats were &#x22;Zero for 40&#x22; on legislation &#x22;limiting 
President Bush&#x27;s war policy&#x22; -- though the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not acknowledge that it had made a mistake 
in the corrected article -- several 
in the 
media, including the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s own Mike Allen, Matt Drudge, 
and ABC&#x27;s The Note, highlighted the false 
statistic without noting that it is inaccurate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711130003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:33:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Clinton  criticized over relinquishment of Socks, but reports ignore Romney  dog-roofing</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710220005</link>
<description>Several media outlets seized on an article in &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Atlantic&#x3C;/em&#x3E; that mentioned that former 
President Bill and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton gave their family cat, Socks, to 
Betty Currie -- with one outlet questioning whether Currie&#x27;s adoption of Socks 
reveals Hillary Clinton to be &#x22;cold and calculating.&#x22; But these media outlets 
made no mention of Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney&#x27;s 
reported 
treatment of his own 
family pet, Seamus, an Irish setter, 
whom Romney reportedly 
placed &#x22;in a dog carrier&#x22; that was &#x22;attached ... to the station wagon&#x27;s roof 
rack&#x22; during the Romney family&#x27;s &#x22;annual 12-hour family trek from Boston to 
Ontario.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710220005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:15:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Following Drudge,  media outlets seize on Obama decision -- years ago -- to stop wearing flag pin</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710060001</link>
<description>Several media outlets -- following the lead of Internet gossip Matt Drudge -- have presented 
Obama&#x27;s comments on not wearing an American flag pin as a recent decision made 
by the candidate, and not an explanation of something he chose to do several 
years ago. CNN, ABC, and Fox News have reported on the &#x22;controversy,&#x22; providing 
a platform for several conservatives to attack Obama&#x27;s patriotism. As NBC News&#x27; 
Chuck Todd put it, &#x22;this was the media getting a classic case of the Drudges.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710060001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:01:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From  cleavage to &#x22;cackle&#x22;? Media find new focus in coverage of Hillary  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:29:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge  Report, ABC highlight AP article that left out key data on Bush/Clinton  &#x22;dynasty&#x22; issue</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709290001</link>
<description>The Drudge Report and ABCNews.com both highlighted an Associated Press article 
that cited an NBC/&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street 
Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; poll that, the article said, &#x22;found that fully one-quarter of 
all Americans said that the prospect of having at least 24 straight years of a 
President Clinton or Bush would be a consideration in their vote for president 
in 2008.&#x22; But the AP left out the data on 
other responses to the question 
-- that a majority of 
respondents, 54 
percent, said it would &#x22;not be 
a consideration at all.&#x22; Nor did the AP 
report that the poll also 
found that 42 percent of respondents &#x22;feel positive&#x22; that former President Bill 
Clinton is Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s (D-NY) husband, while only 28 percent 
&#x22;feel negative&#x22; about it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709290001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:09:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>