<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Slate Magazine</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/slate_magazine</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Slate Magazine</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Tucker Carlson echoed Kaus, VDARE contributor on Michelle Obama: &#x22;I think she&#x27;s got a chip on her shoulder&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210006</link>
<description>Discussing recent comments by Michelle Obama, Tucker Carlson said&#x3C;em&#x3E;:&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;I have thought from Day One that Michelle Obama, impressive as she is, clearly intelligent, very handsome, self-possessed -- I think that she&#x27;s got a chip on her shoulder.&#x22; Similarly, Slate.com blogger Mickey Kaus wrote of Michelle Obama: &#x22;For whatever reason, she sure seems to have a non-trivial chip on her shoulder and it&#x27;s not a winning quality.&#x22; Additionally, referring to a February 16 &#x3C;em&#x3E;Newsweek &#x3C;/em&#x3E;profile, VDARE.com contributor Steve Sailer wrote that Michelle Obama &#x22;sounds like she&#x27;s got a log-sized chip on her shoulder from lucking into Princeton due to affirmative action.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802210006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:21:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From  cleavage to &#x22;cackle&#x22;? Media find new focus in coverage of Hillary  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:29:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Seeking scandal, but lacking evidence of wrongdoing, media &#x22;raise questions&#x22; about Obama</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100014</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:36:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Slate article teased as &#x22;Why Obama Is Like a Serial Killer&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703220006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703220006</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:32:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Myths and falsehoods about Barack Obama</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703200011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703200011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:27:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The press keeps spinning Hillary&#x27;s Iraq vote  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703050007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703050007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:53:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Pelosi smear: Stupid -- but kind of entertaining</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:08:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Scooter Libby and the media debacle</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702060006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702060006</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:11:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Slate.com&#x27;s article on &#x22;Obama&#x27;s Shady Real Estate Deal&#x22; found nothing shady</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200612150014</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200612150014</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:53:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Even though she hasn&#x27;t yet taken office, media already questioning Pelosi&#x27;s suitability as House speaker</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200611200006</link>
<description>Though Nancy Pelosi will not
actually assume the office of House speaker until January, some members of the
media, including Wolf Blitzer and Timothy Noah, have questioned her suitability
for that position, asserting that she has committed &#x22;blunders&#x22; that
have &#x22;underscored her inability to get the job done.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200611200006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 17:12:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Slate&#x27;s Dickerson claimed both Democrats and Republicans are using deceptive push-polling, but provided only GOP example</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310016</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610310016</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:07:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media figures repeat false claim that Armitage role in Plame leak exonerates Libby and Rove</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609010001</link>
<description>Numerous media figures have asserted that a recent report purportedly identifying former deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage as Robert Novak&#x27;s original source for Valerie Plame&#x27;s identity as a CIA operative prove that Karl Rove and I. Lewis &#x22;Scooter&#x22; Libby were not involved in the leak of her identity. However, Armitage&#x27;s role as Novak&#x27;s first source is not inconsistent with Rove&#x27;s and Libby&#x27;s involvements in the leak -- both were original sources of the information for two other reporters.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609010001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:39:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hitchens baselessly claimed Novak&#x27;s recent statements &#x22;dissolved any remaining doubt about the mad theory that the Bush administration &#x27;outed&#x27; Ms. Valerie Plame&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200607210001</link>
<description>Christopher Hitchens concluded that Robert Novak&#x27;s July 12 &#x22;tell-all&#x22; column and his July 16 appearance on Meet the Press &#x22;dissolved any remaining doubt&#x22; that the Bush administration &#x22;outed&#x22; Valerie Plame, but presented irrelevant facts and assertions in support of that conclusion.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200607210001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:27:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Easterbrook baselessly accused Gore film of lacking &#x22;factual precision,&#x22; ignored his own record of twisting facts on global warming</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605260014</link>
<description>In a May 24 Slate.com article, Gregg Easterbrook baselessly criticized Al Gore&#x27;s new film on global warming, &#x3C;em&#x3E;An Inconvenient Truth&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, as factually imprecise and morally careless, but his criticism ignored his history of using distorted scientific research to downplay the threat of global warming.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605260014</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 17:21:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>