<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - National Security/Foreign Policy</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/national_security_foreign_policy</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: National Security/Foreign Policy</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>In response to Mumbai terrorism, Quinn suggested attacks regardless of whether &#x22;a lot of peaceful Muslims&#x22; are hit</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812010013</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;The War Room&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Jim Quinn said: &#x22;We either wipe this scourge from the face of the Earth -- &#x27;Well, you just can&#x27;t say that, because there&#x27;s a lot of peaceful Muslims out there.&#x27; Well, there was a lot of Germans that weren&#x27;t Nazis either, but we still bombed Dresden. We either wipe this scourge from the face of the Earth, or we will be doomed to live under it.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812010013</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Dec 2008 17:13:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Savage on the Mumbai attacks: &#x22;Should the tribal areas in Pakistan be wiped out and the rats killed in there once and for all?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812010009</link>
<description>Discussing the terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India, Michael Savage said: &#x22;Should the tribal areas of Pakistan be wiped out and the rats killed in there once and for all? Should we nuke the tribal areas in Pakistan&#x27;s wild-man region and wipe out the terrorists once and for all?&#x22; Savage later added: &#x22;What the heck do we have nuclear weapons for? What are tactical nuclear weapons for but to wipe out an enemy? The enemy lives there -- kill them and their families, and show them that the terror they inflict on the West will come home to roost and will be inflicted on them.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812010009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:47:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Post&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Ralph Peters ignored evidence undermining his claim that &#x22;finish[ing] off&#x22; bin Laden was &#x22;personal&#x22; for Bush</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811180010</link>
<description>In a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column about recent comments President-elect Barack Obama made concerning Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda, Ralph Peters claimed that, &#x22;Bush has done all he could to finish off the Al Qaeda leader (for Bush, it was personal; for Obama, it&#x27;s just political).&#x22; But, in asserting that Bush &#x22;has done all he could to finish off&#x22; bin Laden, Peters ignored statements Bush has made denying the importance of capturing or killing bin Laden.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811180010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:13:34 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Conservative media attack Obama over reported intention to close Guant&#x26;aacute;namo Bay facility</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811120012</link>
<description>Conservative media figures have baselessly asserted that President-elect Barack Obama&#x27;s reported intention to close the detention facility at Guant&#x26;aacute;namo Bay would result in the release of terrorists and place the country at risk. In fact, news reports state that Obama is considering trials for some detainees and the potential release of others who have been cleared.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811120012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:52:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Carroll aired Cindy McCain&#x27;s attack on Obama over troop funding without noting her husband&#x27;s own vote</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810240002</link>
<description>CNN&#x27;s Jason Carroll aired Cindy McCain&#x27;s claim that Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s &#x22;vote to not fund my son when he was serving sent a cold chill through my body.&#x22; However, Carroll did not point out that Sen. John McCain himself voted against legislation to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810240002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:00:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Shuster&#x27;s suggestion that Obama &#x22;bear[s] a certain responsibility to clarify&#x22; Jackson&#x27;s Israel remarks is based on false distinction</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810160015</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s David Shuster baselessly suggested Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;bear[s] a little bit of responsibility&#x22; for Jesse Jackson&#x27;s reported comments about how U.S. policy toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict would change under an Obama administration -- even though Jackson is not part of the Obama campaign -- because during the previous debate, Shuster said, Sen. John McCain was &#x22;pretty clear&#x22; in answering the question of whether the U.S. would commit troops to Israel if it was attacked by Iran, whereas Obama was not. In fact, Obama and McCain gave similar responses in key respects.  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810160015</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:38:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC.com&#x27;s First Read again falsely claimed McCain &#x22;did not vote&#x22; against troop funding</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810090011</link>
<description>MSNBC.com&#x27;s First Read again falsely claimed that Sen. John McCain &#x22;opposed, but did not vote,&#x22; on a 2007 troop-funding appropriations bill. In fact, while McCain did not vote on a later version of the appropriations bill, he voted against the measure on March 29, 2007, and said at the time that he was opposing it, in part, because it &#x22;would establish a timeline&#x22; for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq.  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810090011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:11:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media repeat Cindy McCain&#x27;s attack on Obama troop-funding vote, ignore John McCain&#x27;s troop-funding vote</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810090004</link>
<description>The &#x3C;em&#x3E;CBS Evening News&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Live Desk&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, and the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Jonathan Martin noted Cindy McCain&#x27;s attack on Sen. Barack Obama that his &#x22;vote to not fund my son when he was serving sent a cold chill through my body.&#x22; However, none of their reports pointed out that Sen. John McCain himself voted against legislation to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810090004</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:34:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Daily News&#x27;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Goodwin, CNN&#x27;s Dobbs, NBC&#x27;s Mitchell latest to mislead on Biden&#x27;s claim that McCain &#x22;voted against funding the troops&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810040003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Lou Dobbs Tonight&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Michael Goodwin and Lou Dobbs falsely claimed that Sen. Joe Biden was wrong when he said during the vice-presidential debate that Sen. John McCain &#x22;voted against funding the troops&#x22; in a 2007 bill making supplemental appropriations for troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. In fact, McCain voted against a supplemental appropriations bill on March 29, 2007, saying at the time that he was opposing it, in part, because it &#x22;would establish a timeline&#x22; for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810040003</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:00:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media again quote debate attack that Obama &#x22;voted against funding the troops&#x22; while omitting Dem response</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810030025</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and the&#x3C;em&#x3E; Los Angeles Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; both reported Gov. Sarah Palin&#x27;s attack during the vice-presidential debate that Sen. &#x22;Barack Obama voted against funding troops&#x22; without noting, as Sen. Joe Biden pointed out in response, that &#x22;[Sen.] John McCain voted the exact same way. John McCain voted against funding the troops because of an amendment he voted against had a timeline in it to draw down American troops.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810030025</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:53:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>UPDATED: CBSNews.com, MSNBC.com, FactCheck.org falsely claim McCain never voted against troop funding bill</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810030010</link>
<description>In reports on the vice presidential debate, CBSNews.com, MSNBC.com, and FactCheck.org all falsely claimed that Sen. Joe Biden&#x27;s statement that Sen. John McCain &#x22;voted against funding the troops&#x22; in a 2007 appropriations bill was wrong. In fact, while McCain did not vote on a later version of the appropriations bill, he voted against the measure on March 29, 2007, and said at the time that he was opposing it, in part, because it &#x22;would establish a timeline&#x22; for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810030010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:01:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s Snow quoted Palin attacking Obama over troop-funding vote but left out key facts about McCain&#x27;s voting record</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810020031</link>
<description>ABC News correspondent Kate Snow uncritically quoted Gov. Sarah Palin&#x27;s claim that Sen. Barack Obama voted for &#x22;[c]utting off funding for our troops while in a war zone.&#x22; However, Snow did not report that Sen. John McCain voted against legislation to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as Obama noted during the September 26 presidential debate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810020031</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Oct 2008 23:00:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;LA Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported Vets for Freedom ad attacking Obama over troop funding vote, but ignored Obama&#x27;s response and McCain&#x27;s own record</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810010008</link>
<description>The&#x3C;em&#x3E; Los Angeles Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; quoted a new Vets for Freedom ad that claims, &#x22;Barack Obama skipped 45% of Senate votes but did manage to show up to vote against emergency funding for our troops,&#x22; but the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;failed to note that Sen. John McCain has voted against legislation to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq -- a point Obama made during the first presidential debate when McCain accused him of voting against troop funding.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810010008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:02:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Brokaw allowed McCain adviser to falsely claim McCain &#x22;called for the firing of Don Rumsfeld&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200809280007</link>
<description>On NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Meet the Press&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Tom Brokaw did not challenge Steve Schmidt&#x27;s false claim that Sen. John McCain &#x22;called for the firing of Don Rumsfeld.&#x22; In fact, the McCain campaign itself reportedly admitted that McCain did not call for Rumsfeld to be fired, or for his resignation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200809280007</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:53:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN airs McCain ad attacking Obama over troop funding vote, but ignores McCain&#x27;s own record</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200809270011</link>
<description>CNN aired clips of what correspondent Jim Acosta called a &#x22;new ad from John McCain&#x22; that &#x22;makes one of the most explosive charges of the campaign, accusing Barack Obama of endangering American soldiers by voting to cut off funds for the war.&#x22; Despite mentioning that Obama said in the September 26 presidential debate that &#x22;he opposed that bill because it lacked a timeline for troop withdrawal,&#x22; Acosta failed to note Obama also pointed out that McCain himself has voted against legislation to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200809270011</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:32:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>