<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - National Review</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/national_review</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: National Review</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>NRO column repeated debunked claim that Obama attempted to delay troop withdrawals</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810080025</link>
<description>In a National Review Online column, Lisa Schiffren claimed that &#x22;[i]n personal conversations,&#x22; Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;asked that the Iraqi leadership wait for the next administration (his) to begin serious troop withdrawals -- as Amir Taheri has documented.&#x22; In fact, a Bush administration official has reportedly said that Taheri&#x27;s assertion was not true. Schiffren also repeated other false and baseless claims in her column providing &#x22;suggestions&#x22; to the McCain campaign.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810080025</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:15:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>In an NRO blog post, Krikorian asked if WaMu&#x27;s diversity policy was &#x22;[c]ause&#x22; of bank&#x27;s demise</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200809260013</link>
<description>In a blog post on National Review Online, Mark Krikorian asked if diversity policies touted by Washington Mutual, which was seized by federal regulators and sold to another bank on September 25, were the &#x22;[c]ause&#x22; of the bank&#x27;s collapse.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200809260013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:00:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NRO&#x27;s Pollowitz falsely claimed Palin visited troops in Kuwait &#x22;a year before&#x22; Obama &#x22;felt the need to go&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808300007</link>
<description>National Review Online&#x27;s Greg Pollowitz falsely claimed that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin visited troops in Kuwait &#x22;a year before Senator [Barack] Obama felt the need to go.&#x22; In fact, Obama first visited troops in Kuwait in January 2006, a year and a half before Palin&#x27;s visit.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808300007</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:02:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Freddoso misrepresents IL government findings to accuse Obama of lying about &#x22;born alive&#x22; legislation</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808200003</link>
<description>In &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Case Against Barack Obama&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, David Freddoso misrepresents findings by the Illinois state government to claim that a statement by Sen. Barack Obama explaining his opposition to a bill that amended the Illinois Abortion Law of 1975 was &#x22;not true.&#x22; Obama asserted that &#x22;measures mandat[ing] lifesaving measures for premature babies&#x22; were &#x22;already the law&#x22; in Illinois. Freddoso falsely asserts that the Illinois Department of Public Health and a letter from the Illinois attorney general&#x27;s office refute Obama&#x27;s statement. They do not; indeed, a reported statement by the Public Health Department supports it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808200003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:27:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NRO&#x27;s Kirsanow and Hanson falsely claimed Obama has not given his views on reparations</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808060008</link>
<description>In separate blog posts on National Review Online, Peter Kirsanow and Victor Davis Hanson each falsely asserted that Sen. Barack Obama has not further explained what he meant when he stated at the UNITY &#x27;08 Convention: &#x22;I&#x27;ve consistently believed, when it comes -- whether it&#x27;s Native American issues, whether it&#x27;s African-American issues and reparations, that the most important thing for the U.S. government to do is not just to offer words, but offer deeds.&#x22; Later in his remarks, Obama said: &#x22;I have said in the past, and I&#x27;ll repeat again, that the best reparations we can provide are good schools in the inner city and jobs for people who are unemployed.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808060008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:50:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Confusing &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and &#x3C;em&#x3E;CQ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, NRO&#x27;s Geraghty falsely claimed Obama campaign ad cited &#x22;the same study&#x22; Obama has criticized  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807080008</link>
<description>National Review Online blogger Jim Geraghty wrote that a new ad for Sen. Barack Obama cites as a source the &#x22; &#x27;Congressional Quarterly 2007 Voting Study.&#x27; This is the same study that called Obama the most liberal lawmaker in the Senate. By citing this study, the Obama campaign seems to be dropping their objections to that characterization, or of CQ&#x27;s calculation methods.&#x22; In fact, Obama was &#x22;the most liberal lawmaker&#x22; according to the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x27;s &#x3C;/em&#x3E;2007 Vote Ratings, not according to &#x3C;em&#x3E;CQ&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, which measured how often senators voted with their party rather than assessing &#x22;liberal&#x22; or &#x22;conservative&#x22; votes and found that &#x22;[t]en Democrats had higher scores&#x22; on the &#x22;party unity&#x22; measure in 2007 than Obama, as PolitiFact.com has noted.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807080008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 19:13:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media diagnose Hillary &#x22;Sybil&#x22; Clinton with &#x22;mood swings,&#x22; depression, and &#x22;multiple personality disorder&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802270010</link>
<description>In recent days, members of the media asserted that Sen. Hillary Clinton displayed &#x22;mood swings,&#x22; &#x22;could be depressed,&#x22; &#x22;[r]esembl[ed] someone with multiple personality disorder,&#x22; and &#x22;has turned into Sybil.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802270010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:21:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bound to repeat it: Conservative media cited &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;most liberal&#x22; rating in 2004, now touting 2007 rating  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140003</link>
<description>In an email to readers encouraging recipients to read the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on the magazine&#x27;s 2007 vote ratings, the National Journal Group wrote: &#x22;In 2004, President Bush invoked Senator John Kerry&#x27;s liberal Vote Ratings score repeatedly on the campaign trail and at their head-to-head debates. We anticipate similar attention for our Vote Ratings across the 2008 election cycle.&#x22; Numerous media did follow suit and tout the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s 2003 rating of Kerry. And once again, the media are giving the 2007 ratings the &#x22;similar attention&#x22; the National Journal Group anticipated -- despite the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s acknowledgment that the methodology it used to rate Kerry was flawed.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802140003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:56:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NRO&#x27;s  Williamson blasted &#x22;the hysterical ninnies over at Media  Matters&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802010006</link>
<description>National Review Online blogger Kevin D. Williamson called &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters &#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x22;hysterical ninnies&#x22; over a  column by &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; Eric  Boehlert that predicted &#x22;a very rough 2008&#x22;  for Fox News.   </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802010006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:04:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Byron York&#x27;s admittedly &#x22;wildly inappropriate&#x22; comparison: Giuliani&#x27;s Florida concession speech and slain Italian hostage&#x27;s final words  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801300010</link>
<description>In a column about Rudy Giuliani&#x27;s speech following his &#x22;resounding defeat in the Florida primary,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Review&#x3C;/em&#x3E; White House correspondent Byron York wrote: &#x22;[I]t is hard not to think of Fabrizio Quattrocchi, the courageous Genoan who, taken hostage by Islamic terrorists in Iraq in 2004 cried out, &#x27;Now I will show you how an Italian dies!&#x27; just before he was shot.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801300010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:56:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NRO contributor Smith &#x22;hard-pressed&#x22; to find U.S. service members who would say &#x22;it&#x27;s not going well&#x22; in Iraq</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710290008</link>
<description>In a post
on the NRO military blog
The Tank, W. Thomas Smith Jr. asserted that he had been to Iraq, spent
&#x22;[d]ays -- sometimes weeks -- at a time&#x22; with units in action, and
would be &#x22;hard-pressed to find one American Marine or soldier (or a Brit)
who would say to me &#x27;it&#x27;s not going well.&#x27; &#x22; However, there are several examples
of active-duty or retired service members
expressing discontent with progress in Iraq through media outlets.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710290008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:00:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;National  Review&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; York ignores Limbaugh  falsehood about splicing of audio and transcript</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030010</link>
<description>Reporting on Rush Limbaugh&#x27;s explanation of his &#x22;phony soldiers&#x22; comments, Byron 
York wrote that &#x22;[a]s part of that explanation&#x22; Limbaugh &#x22;played a tape of the 
original September 26 program [and] cut some extraneous material out -- &#x27;for 
space and relevance reasons, not to hide anything,&#x27; he told me.&#x22; In fact, 
Limbaugh said that he was airing &#x22;the entire transcript, in context, that led to 
this so-called controversy&#x22; and gave no indication that he cropped the audio or the transcript.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710030010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:35:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NRO&#x27;s 2007 &#x22;webathon&#x22; slogan: &#x22;Help Us Stop Hillary!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710010006</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710010006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:32:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NRO&#x27;s Derbyshire wants to deny Muslims entry to the U.S. and &#x22;expel foreign Muslim residents&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709210012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709210012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:36:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NRO contributors ignore Ledeen&#x27;s attack on Abizaid despite denunciation of Petraeus critics</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709210006</link>
<description>In a blog post on National Review Online&#x27;s The Corner, Michael Ledeen wrote that it &#x22;was
under [retired Army Gen. John] Abizaid that
the copious evidence of Iranian activity was suppressed, and we, let&#x27;s say,
took it easy on the thousands of Revolutionary Guards killers running all over
the country.&#x22; While several NRO
contributors criticized MoveOn.org for its &#x22;General Betray Us&#x22; ad and
Democrats for not condemning it, no
NRO contributor has similarly condemned Ledeen&#x27;s criticism of an American general.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709210006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:10:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>