<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Mike Huckabee</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/mike_huckabee</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Mike Huckabee</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Don&#x27;t believe the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hype: &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Will newspapers distributing Bossie&#x27;s DVD report on its falsehoods?</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200810300012</link>
<description>The conservative activist group Citizens United is reportedly distributing &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hype: The Obama Effect&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, a DVD attacking Sen. Barack Obama, this week in newspapers in Ohio, Nevada, and Florida. The AP quoted Citizens United president David Bossie saying of the film, &#x22;We think it&#x27;s a truthful attack. People can take it anyway they want.&#x22; But a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; analysis of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hype&#x3C;/em&#x3E; finds that it contains numerous falsehoods and misrepresentations of Obama&#x27;s record. Newspapers that distribute the DVD should consider their obligation to provide readers with information that discredits it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200810300012</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:01:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox, Huckabee misrepresented Obama plans for health care, taxes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808280014</link>
<description>Fox News contributor Mike Huckabee falsely claimed that, under Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s health-care plan, &#x22;the government will be in control,&#x22; and that &#x22;we&#x27;re going to be rationing it.&#x22; In fact, Obama has not proposed government-run health care. Indeed, Obama&#x27;s website specifically states that, under his proposal, individuals &#x22;will not have to change plans.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808280014</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:44:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News contributor Mike Huckabee falsely claimed &#x22;not one drop of oil was spilled&#x22; during Hurricane Katrina  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806270005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Mike Huckabee falsely asserted, &#x22;When Katrina, a Cat-5 hurricane, hit the Gulf Coast, not one drop of oil was spilled off of those rigs out in the Gulf of Mexico.&#x22; In fact, according to a report prepared for the federal government by an international consulting firm, damages related to Hurricane Katrina resulted in 70 spills from outer continental shelf structures with a total volume of approximately 5,552&#x3C;a href=&#x22;#correction&#x22;&#x3E;*&#x3C;/a&#x3E; barrels of oil and petroleum products.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806270005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:11:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;USA  Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  labeled conservative evangelical Huckabee supporters as &#x22;value  voters&#x22;     </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801250016</link>
<description>Repeating the myth that social conservatives are the only political constituency  that votes its &#x22;values,&#x22; the January 24 &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today &#x3C;/em&#x3E;twice referred to voters most  inclined to support Republican presidential candidate and former Arkansas  Governor Mike Huckabee as &#x22;values voters.&#x22; A front-page graphic claimed  &#x22;Huckabee: Has drawn evangelicals and &#x27;values voters,&#x27; &#x22; while an accompanying  article noted that &#x22;Huckabee&#x27;s strength is among just those kind of &#x27;values  voters&#x27; &#x22; who are &#x22;uncomfortable&#x22; with Rudy Giuliani.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801250016</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:17:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Despite earlier  calling it a &#x22;myth,&#x22; CNN aired Huckabee&#x27;s claim that FairTax allows workers to  &#x22;get their whole paychecks&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801250010</link>
<description>During a report on CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Situation  Room&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Mary Snow uncritically aired Mike Huckabee&#x27;s assertion that  &#x22;[i]f we could free people up to go out and earn -- get their whole paychecks --  it could make a truly huge difference in securing jobs and making the economy  work.&#x22; However, in a previous report, CNN&#x27;s Ali Velshi had rebutted the claim  that, under the FairTax plan, workers would get to keep their entire paychecks,  saying, &#x22;Promoters like Huckabee talk about how you&#x27;d get 100 percent of your  salary paid to you. Now, that is a myth.&#x22;   </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801250010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:13:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beck falsely claimed Dem candidates have not supported striking writers  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801250004</link>
<description>On his CNN Headline News program, Glenn Beck repeatedly suggested that the top Democratic presidential candidates have not shown support for the ongoing Writers Guild strike. In fact, all of the Democratic front-runners have expressed support for the striking writers. John Edwards joined them on a Los Angeles picket line, and Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton each issued statements of support for the writers. The candidates also withdrew from a planned December 10 CBS News debate, forcing its cancellation.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801250004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:13:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Morris claimed  Huckabee&#x27;s  &#x22;refusal to indulge in  negative advertising  ...  show[ed] his strength under fire&#x22;  --  after deriding his actions on anti-Romney ad as  &#x22;stupid&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801040007</link>
<description>In  a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, Dick Morris  and Eileen McGann  wrote that Mike  Huckabee&#x27;s &#x22;refusal to indulge in  negative advertising sent a message to Iowa voters showing his strength under fire.&#x22;  But on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Morris criticized as  &#x22;a stupid move&#x22; Huckabee&#x27;s actions at a press conference during which Huckabee  played an anti-Mitt  Romney ad for the  assembled media, after stating that he was renouncing negative  advertising in the run-up to the  Iowa  caucuses and had decided not to  air the ad.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801040007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:05:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightly News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; repeatedly noted Huckabee&#x27;s  upcoming appearance on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Tonight  Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E; without reporting he crossed picket  line</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801030007</link>
<description>On January 2, despite numerous references on NBC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Nightly News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; to Mike Huckabee&#x27;s appearance  later that night on &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Tonight Show with Jay Leno&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, no one noted  that Huckabee would be crossing a picket line in making the appearance.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801030007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:27:10 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hannity  and Colmes left unchallenged Huckabee&#x27;s inconsistent statements on distribution  of anti-Romney  ad  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801030002</link>
<description>On the January 1 &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Mike  Huckabee discussed a  campaign advertisement attacking Mitt Romney that Huckabee said he decided not to air,  claiming: &#x22;I don&#x27;t know  how you obtained that copy [of the ad] because we didn&#x27;t give it to anybody. We had a box of CDs of them. We gave them  to no one. We showed it in that room for those reporters, and the only way they  could have gotten it would be to tape it, I guess, off a camera from the  screen.&#x22; But during a December 31 press conference, Huckabee  himself said that his campaign had sent the ad to television stations, telling  reporters, &#x22;We prepared it, sent it to the stations. It was supposed to start running at noon  today.&#x22; Moreover, Colmes himself had reported that  &#x22;Fox News exclusively obtained a clean copy of the Huckabee attack ad that he  ordered pulled earlier today.&#x22; Yet neither Sean Hannity nor Alan Colmes challenged  Huckabee&#x27;s assertions.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801030002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:42:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dick Morris  misrepresented facts of  DuMond case in purporting to explain Huckabee&#x27;s  focus</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712120006</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Dick 
Morris asserted that 
&#x22;the reason everybody 
was focused on him [Wayne DuMond] 
is he was castrated while he was in prison by his fellow inmates 
by a knife.&#x22; But that was not the reason Mike Huckabee 
gave for &#x22;focus[ing]&#x22; on DuMond, and it is not what Huckabee -- or news reports 
-- said happened. In his book, &#x3C;em&#x3E;From Hope to Higher Ground&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Mike Huckabee wrote of DuMond: &#x22;Prior to his trial, two men broke 
into his home, hog-tied him, and castrated him. They left him to bleed to 
death.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712120006</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:25:24 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Brzezinski praised Huckabee as &#x22;honest&#x22; despite his documented deceptions in response to AIDS controversy</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712110003</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,
while discussing the controversy surrounding Mike Huckabee&#x27;s 1992
statements about AIDS, Mika Brzezinski praised Huckabee for being
&#x22;charming,&#x22; &#x22;authentic,&#x22; and &#x22;honest,&#x22; and
stated that the way he&#x27;s handling the issue is &#x22;brilliant.&#x22; In
fact, Huckabee has claimed that he &#x22;didn&#x27;t say that we should
quarantine&#x22; AIDS patients, and he has asserted that &#x22;[t]here was
still so much confusion about HIV transmission&#x22; at the time he made the
statements in question. But as several news outlets pointed out, by 1992, it
was widely known that AIDS could not be transmitted via casual contact.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712110003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:13:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.&#x3C;em&#x3E; Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  uncritically reported Huckabee&#x27;s false claim that &#x22;in 1992 there was much confusion about how AIDS was spread&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712090005</link>
<description>Writing about reports that Mike Huckabee had suggested quarantining people with AIDS in 1992,&#x3C;em&#x3E; Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; staff writer Perry Bacon Jr. uncritically reported: &#x22;As Huckabee&#x27;s response to a questionnaire on AIDS began to circulate yesterday, his campaign issued a statement from him noting that in 1992 there was much confusion about how AIDS was spread.&#x22; But an Associated Press article reported that &#x22;[w]hen Huckabee wrote his answers in 1992, it was common knowledge that AIDS could not be spread by casual contact.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712090005</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:25:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;NY  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; chronicled Huckabee&#x27;s rise in polls -- but not recent developments in DuMond  case</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712060005</link>
<description>In the last week, several news outlets have reported on recent developments in 
the case of Wayne DuMond, a convicted rapist sentenced to life in prison in 
1984, who was paroled in 1997 after &#x22;[then-Arkansas Gov. Mike] Huckabee and a 
senior member of his staff exerted behind-the-scenes influence.&#x22; While both 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; have published 
articles discussing Huckabee&#x27;s rise in the polls for the Republican presidential 
nomination, and several reporters at each newspaper have written blog posts 
citing Huckabee&#x27;s role in the DuMond case as potentially politically damaging, 
neither newspaper has published a news article discussing recent developments about Huckabee&#x27;s role 
in the case.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712060005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:27:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Brewer, &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News&#x27; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Walsh&#x3C;em&#x3E; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;didn&#x27;t note Huckabee&#x27;s reported acknowledgment that he had not even heard of NIE on Iran</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712050008</link>
<description>MSNBC&#x27;s Contessa Brewer
and &#x3C;em&#x3E;U.S. News &#x26;amp; World Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s
Kenneth Walsh discussed the general reactions of &#x22;GOP [presidential]
candidates&#x22; to the release of the key judgments of a National
Intelligence Estimate on Iran. While Brewer mentioned the specific reactions of
John McCain and Fred Thompson, neither Brewer nor Walsh noted that Mike
Huckabee reportedly stated that he was not familiar with the NIE, having not read it, not been briefed on it, and not even heard of
it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712050008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Dec 2007 16:10:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s Cooper  praised Huckabee&#x27;s failure to answer WWJD question as &#x22;probably one of the best  answers you could possibly come up to&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711300003</link>
<description>During post-debate discussion of the November 28 CNN/YouTube Republican debate, 
CNN&#x27;s Anderson Cooper praised Mike Huckabee&#x27;s response to the question, &#x22;The 
death penalty: What would Jesus do?&#x22; calling Huckabee&#x27;s answer, &#x22;certainly, 
probably one of the best answers you could possibly come up to, to that 
question.&#x22; However, Huckabee, who has repeatedly invoked Jesus Christ and 
Christianity to explain his position on matters of public policy, did not answer 
the question or Cooper&#x27;s own follow-up.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711300003</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:52:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>