<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Mike Allen</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/mike_allen</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Mike Allen</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Ignoring reported favors to lobbyists, land-swap deals, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x27;s &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Martin and Allen uncritically quoted McCain&#x27;s assertion that &#x22;[l]obbyists don&#x27;t come to my office&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808210003</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen and Jonathan Martin uncritically reported Sen. John McCain&#x27;s assertion during an &#x22;exclusive&#x22; interview: &#x22;Lobbyists don&#x27;t come to my office. Because they know they&#x27;re not going to be an earmark. They know they&#x27;re not going to get a pork-barrel project. Senator Obama&#x27;s gotten lots of &#x27;em.&#x22; Allen and Martin did not note that, to the contrary, lobbyists have reportedly received considerable benefits from McCain on behalf of their clients.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808210003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:38:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citing response about Hanoi prison, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; characterized as &#x22;new&#x22; McCain&#x27;s willingness to discuss his &#x22;biography&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808180008</link>
<description>During an appearance at Pastor Rick Warren&#x27;s Saddleback  Church, responding to a question about &#x22;the most gut-wrenching decision you&#x27;ve ever made,&#x22; Sen. John McCain cited his refusal to accept an early release from a North Vietnamese prison camp. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; claimed that McCain&#x27;s answer &#x22;shows the power of his biography, and a new willingness to publicly discuss it.&#x22; In fact, McCain has repeatedly referred to his Vietnam war experiences and has specifically cited his refusal to accept an early release in a book, interviews, speeches, and campaign ads since 1999.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808180008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:15:06 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hugh Hewitt Show&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen said McCain suggestion that Obama will &#x22;raise your taxes&#x22; might be effective -- but doesn&#x27;t note it&#x27;s false</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808070007</link>
<description>On Hugh Hewitt&#x27;s show, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen said that &#x22;Senator [John] McCain had a good week last week&#x22; and stated it may be because of the McCain campaign&#x27;s &#x22;Celebrity&#x22; ad, which &#x22;suggested [Sen. Barack] Obama is going to raise taxes.&#x22; Allen did not note that the claim is false. In fact, Obama has proposed cutting taxes for low- and middle-income families, and McCain&#x27;s own chief economic adviser has reportedly said it is inaccurate to say that &#x22;Barack Obama raises taxes.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808070007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:51:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen repeats RNC ad verbatim, doesn&#x27;t report Obama response  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807070006</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen reported on the content of a Republican National Committee attack ad against Sen. Barack Obama, yet failed to report the Obama campaign&#x27;s response. Blog posts about the ad at &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post &#x3C;/em&#x3E;and&#x3C;em&#x3E; The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, meanwhile, noted the Obama campaign&#x27;s response to it.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807070006</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:59:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>While Mike Allen equated critics of White House press corps&#x27; war coverage with &#x22;left-wing haters,&#x22; ex-colleague Dobbs wrote, &#x22;We failed you&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300008</link>
<description>On Mike Gallagher&#x27;s radio show, Mike Allen said of Scott McClellan&#x27;s new book: &#x22;Scott does adopt the vocabulary, rhetoric of the left-wing haters. Can you believe it in here he says that the White House press corps was too deferential to the administration ... in the run-up to the war?&#x22; By contrast, two of Allen&#x27;s former colleagues echoed the media criticism of Allen&#x27;s so-called &#x22;left-wing haters.&#x22; Michael Dobbs asserted that &#x22;on the question of whether the American press did its job properly during the run-up to the Iraq war, it is difficult to argue with his conclusions. We failed you.&#x22; Similarly, Howard Kurtz stated that print coverage during the run-up to the war was &#x22;flawed,&#x22; adding: &#x22;It was only when violence surged in Iraq and public opinion began turning against the war that ABC, CBS, NBC, and the rest of the media turned more skeptical.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805300008</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:30:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen misrepresented Obama&#x27;s April 16 debate response on &#x22;disown[ing]&#x22; Wright comments  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804290002</link>
<description>Reporting on a speech by Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s former pastor,&#x3C;em&#x3E; Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen misrepresented Obama&#x27;s April 16 debate response on &#x22;disown[ing]&#x22; Wright&#x27;s controversial remarks by writing, &#x22;Obama referred to Wright as &#x27;somebody who is associated with me that I have disowned,&#x27; then clarified that to say he had disowned the comments.&#x22; Allen left out the first part of Obama&#x27;s sentence: &#x22;[T]he notion that somehow that the American people are going to be distracted once again by comments not made by me but somebody who is associated with me that I have disowned, I think doesn&#x27;t give the American people enough credit.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804290002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:33:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen again promotes myth of McCain as straight-talker, who &#x22;resist[s] pandering&#x22;    </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803260008</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen wrote, &#x22;It looks like Senator [John] McCain will resist pandering when he speaks later today on the housing crisis.&#x22; Allen cited prepared remarks in which McCain said: &#x22;Let&#x27;s start with some straight talk. I will not play election year politics with the housing crisis,&#x22; and claimed that he has &#x22;always been committed to the principle that it is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act irresponsibly, whether they are big banks or small borrowers.&#x22; But Allen has yet to note that McCain said he does not think the Federal Reserve acted improperly by extending a $30 billion line of credit to facilitate the acquisition of the near-bankrupt investment bank Bear Stearns by JP Morgan Chase.    </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803260008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:54:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen touted McCain campaign assertion that Obama &#x22;is the most liberal senator in the United   States Senate&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802200005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Mike Allen uncritically quoted an assertion by Sen. John McCain&#x27;s campaign manager that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;is the most liberal senator in the United States Senate&#x22; -- presumably a reference to &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s 2007 vote ratings. By repeating the McCain campaign&#x27;s invocation of the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; vote ratings, Allen joined Karl Rove, Pat Buchanan, and other conservative media figures in promoting the ratings, as &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; anticipated the media would.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802200005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:45:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen cited &#x3C;em&#x3E;Women&#x27;s Wear Daily &#x3C;/em&#x3E;article that cropped &#x3C;em&#x3E;Vogue &#x3C;/em&#x3E;editor&#x27;s statement on canceled Clinton photo shoot  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230005</link>
<description>In a recent blog entry, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; chief political writer Mike Allen posted a passage from &#x3C;em&#x3E;Women&#x27;s Wear Daily &#x3C;/em&#x3E;that misrepresented a statement by &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Vogue&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editor-in-chief Anna Wintour in her February &#x22;letter from the editor,&#x22; in which she addressed Sen. Hillary Clinton&#x27;s cancellation of a scheduled cover shoot. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;WWD&#x3C;/em&#x3E; cropped Wintour&#x27;s comments in which she critiqued the media, and neither Allen nor &#x3C;em&#x3E;WWD&#x3C;/em&#x3E; indicated through ellipses or otherwise that words had been omitted.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:43:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On CNN, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Allen defends McCain response to &#x22;bitch&#x22; question about Clinton: &#x22;[W]hat Republican voter hasn&#x27;t thought that? What voter in general hasn&#x27;t thought that?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711140011</link>
<description>Discussing a campaign event at
which a questioner asked Sen. John McCain, &#x22;How do we beat the
bitch?&#x22; -- presumably referring to Sen.
Hillary Rodham Clinton --&#x3C;em&#x3E; Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;
chief political correspondent Mike Allen said, &#x22;[W]hat Republican voter
hasn&#x27;t thought that? What voter in general hasn&#x27;t thought
that?&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711140011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:32:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC&#x27;s The Note, NBC&#x27;s First Read, Drudge Report, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen continue to  highlight &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x27;s  &#x3C;/em&#x3E;false  assertion on Dem Iraq  bills</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711130003</link>
<description>Despite the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s correction 
of its claim that Democrats were &#x22;Zero for 40&#x22; on legislation &#x22;limiting 
President Bush&#x27;s war policy&#x22; -- though the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not acknowledge that it had made a mistake 
in the corrected article -- several 
in the 
media, including the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s own Mike Allen, Matt Drudge, 
and ABC&#x27;s The Note, highlighted the false 
statistic without noting that it is inaccurate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711130003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:33:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;[B]lessing&#x22; by  Robertson -- who called  for assassination of Hugo Chavez and spoke of Europe&#x27;s &#x22;racial suicide&#x22; -- gives Giuliani  &#x22;momentum&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200711070005</link>
<description>Politico.com called Pat Robertson endorsement of Rudy Giuliani a &#x22;blessing&#x22; and 
said that it gives Giuliani &#x22;momentum.&#x22; Similarly, the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Allen wrote that, with 
Robertson&#x27;s announcement, Giuliani &#x22;has one of the most resonant imprimaturs 
with Christian voters.&#x22; However, in claiming that Robertson&#x27;s endorsement &#x22;gives 
Rudy Giuliani momentum&#x22; -- a questionable claim, given that the endorsement had 
been announced just that morning -- the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ignored Robertson&#x27;s history of 
controversial statements.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200711070005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:11:42 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From  cleavage to &#x22;cackle&#x22;? Media find new focus in coverage of Hillary  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:29:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The media misses  Mitt Romney&#x27;s YouTube moment</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708130007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708130007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:43:21 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s  Allen uncritically quoted McConnell claiming Democratic Congress has &#x22;not been  very productive&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707250011</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:18:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>