<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Media Responses</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/media_responses</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Media Responses</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly: Fox News altered &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;reporter&#x27;s photo to &#x22;ma[ke] fun of him ... for painting a distorted ratings picture ... and propping up MSNBC&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807180009</link>
<description>Commenting on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; airing of an altered photo of &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Jacques Steinberg, Fox News&#x27; Bill O&#x27;Reilly said:&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;You may remember Fox News made fun of him recently for painting a distorted ratings picture -- that&#x27;s why they distorted his picture -- and propping up MSNBC.&#x22; O&#x27;Reilly previously compared the altered photo, which &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not indicate was distorted, to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; illustration of him.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807180009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:49:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Author of &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Limbaugh profile: &#x22;I&#x27;m a little bit defensive because I think that the liberal media takes such an unfair view of him&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807090002</link>
<description>In an interview on WNYC&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;On the Media&#x3C;/em&#x3E; regarding his profile of Rush Limbaugh for &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times Magazine&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Zev Chafets asserted: &#x22;I&#x27;m not an apologist for Rush Limbaugh, but I&#x27;m a little bit defensive because I think that the liberal media takes such an unfair view of him.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807090002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:34:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>O&#x27;Reilly compared altered &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends &#x3C;/em&#x3E;photo with an &#x3C;em&#x3E;illustration&#x3C;/em&#x3E; of him by the &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807080003</link>
<description>Discussing the controversy over &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27; airing of altered photos of two &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; staffers, Fox News&#x27; Bill O&#x27;Reilly compared the photo of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter Jacques Steinberg, which &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not indicate was distorted, to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; illustration of him.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807080003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:14:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kurtz: Fellow &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reporter&#x27;s anonymous quote of White House official praising Bush &#x22;probably wasn&#x27;t worth a grant of anonymity&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805060008</link>
<description>In a washingtonpost.com discussion, Howard Kurtz said that a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post &#x3C;/em&#x3E;reporter&#x27;s grant of anonymity to a &#x22;senior White House official&#x22; -- who expressed the belief that there are &#x22;a number of things that will get done&#x22; in the remainder of President Bush&#x27;s term in office -- &#x22;probably wasn&#x27;t worth&#x22; it.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805060008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 May 2008 19:33:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>NPR&#x27;s Rudin said &#x22;I wish I hadn&#x27;t&#x22; compared Clinton to Glenn Close in &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fatal Attraction&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805030001</link>
<description>National Public Radio political director Ken Rudin wrote in an April 30 blog post:&#x3C;strong&#x3E; &#x3C;strong&#x3E;&#x22;[D]id I really say on CNN that Hillary Clinton reminded me of Glenn Close in&#x3C;/strong&#x3E; &#x3C;/strong&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fatal Attraction&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;strong&#x3E;&#x3C;strong&#x3E;? I did. I wish I hadn&#x27;t. It was a facile and dumb comparison.&#x22; As &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; noted, while discussing the Democratic presidential primary race on the &#x3C;/strong&#x3E;&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;April 27 edition of CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;Sunday Morning&#x3C;/em&#x3E;,&#x3C;strong&#x3E; &#x3C;strong&#x3E;Rudin said, &#x22;&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;&#x3C;/strong&#x3E;Hillary Clinton is Glenn Close in &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fatal Attraction&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805030001</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 May 2008 13:52:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Matthews to  Shuster on &#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E;: &#x22;I&#x27;ll  getcha Christie Brinkley! Ha!&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801220008</link>
<description>While discussing a charity event he is scheduled to host that will feature  singer Billy Joel, MSNBC&#x27;s Chris Matthews -- in response to co-host David  Shuster&#x27;s remark, &#x22;Billy Joel tickets, Philadelphia Orchestra, we&#x27;re expecting  something in return&#x22; -- replied, &#x22;I&#x27;ll getcha Christie Brinkley. Ha!&#x22; Matthews  recently sparked a firestorm of criticism after saying that &#x22;the reason&#x22; Sen.  Hillary Rodham Clinton &#x22;may be a front-runner is  her husband messed around,&#x22; and that &#x22;[s]he didn&#x27;t win [a Senate seat] there  [New York] on  her merit.&#x22;   </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801220008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:38:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC&#x27;s Scarborough highlighted O&#x27;Reilly&#x27;s comments about Sylvia&#x27;s in Harlem</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709250004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709250004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:21:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Defending claim that Clinton said surge was &#x22;working,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Union-Leader &#x3C;/em&#x3E;editorial page editor provided evidence to the contrary</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708310004</link>
<description>Responding to &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x27; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;criticism, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Manchester Union Leader &#x3C;/em&#x3E;editorial page
editor Drew Cline defended the newspaper&#x27;s statement that Sen. &#x22;Hillary Clinton
said Gen. David Petraeus&#x27; troop surge is working.&#x22; Cline wrote:
&#x22;Media Muddles preposterously asserts that when Clinton
said &#x27;change tactics in Iraq&#x27;
she was not talking about the surge. ... Oh, OK. The changed tactics refer
to what, then? THE SURGE!&#x22; But the articles that Cline cited for support show that she attributed the progress in Iraq&#x27;s Al Anbar province to U.S.
agreements with local tribal leaders that began in September 2006.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708310004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:41:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; of Shreveport, LA, drops Coulter</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703080007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703080007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:55:59 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Politico&#x3C;/em&#x3E; concedes errors identified by &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; senior researcher</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703070004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703070004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:42:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; failed to report Bush&#x27;s omission of Katrina, New   Orleans in State of the Union address</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701250015</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701250015</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:57:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Morgan claimed she&#x27;s &#x22;getting all the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; emails&#x22; about Spocko controversy</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701120009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701120009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:40:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Morgan pledged to &#x22;hit back&#x22; over Spocko controversy, claimed it &#x22;is all going through &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701120003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701120003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:44:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ABC shut down blogger who criticized violent rhetoric on one of its radio stations</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701090004</link>
<description>The mainstream media have yet to
report on the story of a blogger whose website was shut down after he began
spotlighting inflammatory rhetoric common to several talk radio hosts on KSFO,
an ABC Radio-owned station in San Francisco.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701090004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:33:52 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>UPDATE: &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; published correction to flawed Lieberman article</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610250007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:00:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>