<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - FrontPage Magazine</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/frontpage_magazine</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: FrontPage Magazine</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>Dick Morris again falsely claimed Clinton said Chelsea &#x22;was jogging around the World Trade Center on 9/11&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803270008</link>
<description>Syndicated columnist and Fox News contributor Dick Morris and his wife, Eileen McGann, falsely asserted in a column that Sen. Hillary Clinton &#x22;said that Chelsea [Clinton] was jogging around the World Trade  Center on 9/11 and happened to duck into a coffee shop when the airplanes hit. She said that this move saved Chelsea&#x27;s life.&#x22; In fact, Hillary Clinton made no such claim.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803270008</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:56:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Daniel Pipes relied on  disputed &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;LA  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article  to revive Obama-Muslim falsehood</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801020004</link>
<description>On FrontPageMag.com, Daniel Pipes purported to consider whether Sen. Barack  Obama was &#x22;ever a Muslim or seen by others as a Muslim.&#x22; But in  support of his statement that &#x22;available  evidence suggests Obama was born a Muslim to a non-practicing Muslim father and  for some years had a reasonably Muslim upbringing,&#x22; Pipes cited a March  &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Los Angeles  Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article, critical parts of which  have been challenged by  the &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Chicago  Tribune&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801020004</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Jan 2008 17:29:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz&#x27;s  FrontPageMag.com yet to correct false Princeton  assault story</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190001</link>
<description>FrontPageMag.com, the &#x22;online magazine&#x22; of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, posted an 
excerpt from a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Sun&#x3C;/em&#x3E; 
article published that day detailing allegations by a Princeton University student who claimed he had been 
assaulted because of his conservative views. However, while the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Sun&#x3C;/em&#x3E; updated its story to report that Nava 
admitted to police that &#x22;he fabricated the assault,&#x22; FrontPageMag.com has yet to 
acknowledge that the entire story was fabricated.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712190001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:06:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dick  Morris makes numerous false claims in purported attempt to &#x22;correct[]&#x22; Bill  Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;syrupy five minute ad for Hillary&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708150007</link>
<description>In a FrontPageMag.com column, Dick Morris purported to offer &#x22;corrections&#x22; to 
President Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;syrupy five minute ad&#x22; for Sen. 
Hillary Clinton. But Morris made no fewer than seven different 
claims about the video or Sen. Clinton 
that contained 
outright falsehoods or are contradicted by other 
sources.

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708150007</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:51:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media outlets respond to Morris retraction</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701190007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701190007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:34:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and others repeated Morris&#x27; Obama falsehood despite Morris&#x27; acknowledgment of error</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200701180007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200701180007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:59:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz, FrontPageMag misrepresented CREW statement on Foley emails to suggest &#x22;obstruction of justice&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610100017</link>
<description>In a press release alleging possible &#x22;criminal obstruction of justice&#x22; in the Mark Foley scandal, David Horowitz&#x27;s FrontPageMag.com claimed that Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington said it has held &#x22;incriminating e-mails revealing Foley&#x27;s sexual misconduct since at least July 2006.&#x22; In fact, CREW has explicitly stated that it both received the emails and sent them to the FBI on the same day in July.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610100017</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:36:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz falsely accused &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; of engaging in &#x22;crass doctoring of conservative statements&#x22; over his defense of Mel Gibson</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070004</link>
<description>David Horowitz falsely accused &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; of &#x22;crass doctoring of conservative statements&#x22; in a response to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; item noting that several conservative media figures -- including Horowitz -- defended Mel Gibson after he made a series of anti-Semitic remarks. In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reprinted verbatim Horowitz&#x27;s defense of Gibson from his appearance on the August 1 edition of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608070004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:55:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>FrontPageMag&#x27;s Laksin falsely claimed &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;concede[d]&#x22; that half the professors in Horowitz&#x27;s book &#x22;use their classrooms for political agendas&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606120009</link>
<description>FrontPageMag.com senior editor Jacob Laksin falsely claimed that a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; study of right-wing activist David Horowitz&#x27;s book &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x22;concede[d] that nearly half the professors [Horowitz profiled] do in fact use their classrooms for political agendas.&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; conceded no such thing.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606120009</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:10:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz: &#x22;Cornel West is a black airhead&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606020004</link>
<description>David Horowitz referred to Princeton  University professor Cornel West as a &#x22;black airhead,&#x22; adding that he &#x22;is blessed with these unearned and undeserved perks solely because he&#x27;s black.&#x22; Horowitz further described West&#x27;s work as &#x22;useless&#x22; and claimed that he &#x22;hasn&#x27;t written as scholarly paper or book in twenty years (if ever).&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606020004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Jun 2006 12:29:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Horowitz attacked &#x22;the creatures&#x22; at &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, claimed we drew distinction between &#x22;lies&#x22; and &#x22;falsehoods&#x22; -- but he has done the same</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604250010</link>
<description>David Horowitz attacked &#x22;the creatures&#x22; at &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; for &#x22;pars[ing] the difference between making false claims and lying&#x22; to rebut Horowitz&#x27;s assertion that &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; accused him of &#x22;lying&#x22; in noting his false claim that his book, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, doesn&#x27;t attack &#x22;professors&#x27; political speech&#x22; outside the &#x22;classroom.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604250010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:42:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>David Horowitz debunks David Horowitz: a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; analysis of &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Professors&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604180011</link>
<description>Right-wing activist David Horowitz has attacked &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; for noting -- contrary to Horowitz&#x27;s denial on the April 6 edition of Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E; -- that his recent book contains numerous instances in which he cited the purported extracurricular activities of the professors he criticized in the book. Horowitz has conceded that there is a &#x22;sliver of truth in the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; statement&#x22; that documented his inconsistencies, but he downplayed this, claiming that &#x22;my book is a series of profiles of 101 professors&#x22; that includes &#x22;general perspectives, [that] may or may not be expressed outside the classroom.&#x22;  However, a detailed &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; study of the book shows that Horowitz&#x27;s suggestion that his book does not rely heavily on professors&#x27; activities and speech outside of the classroom is false.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604180011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:37:45 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A day after calling &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; a &#x22;smear site,&#x22; Horowitz conceded &#x22;sliver of truth&#x22; in &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; item</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200604140010</link>
<description>In a blog post on his FrontPageMag.com website, David Horowitz falsely claimed that &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; called him a liar. But he also admitted that there is a &#x22;sliver of truth in the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; [April 10] statement&#x22; pointing out that on the April 6 edition of &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Horowitz falsely claimed that he does not attack university professors&#x27; political speech outside the classroom.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200604140010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 18:19:22 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Coulter on the issue of AIDS: Hollywood &#x22;got caught with its pants down&#x22; and &#x22;got it right in the end&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200603090003</link>
<description>In her March 8 syndicated column, right-wing pundit Ann Coulter wrote that Hollywood &#x22;got caught with its pants down&#x22; on the issue of AIDS and &#x22;got it right in the end.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200603090003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:59:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>