<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Economic Issues</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/economic_issues</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Economic Issues</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Portfolio&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Cooper quoted strategist discussing Employee Free Choice Act without IDing him as spokesperson for group opposing the bill</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200901080001</link>
<description>In a column about the &#x22;coming war&#x22; over the Employee Free Choice Act, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Portfolio&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Matthew Cooper wrote that &#x22;[p]olitical veteran Mark McKinnon, a former media adviser to George W. Bush, says he&#x27;s &#x27;never seen business this fired up.&#x27; &#x22; But Cooper did not identify McKinnon as a spokesperson for the Workforce Fairness Institute, an organization opposing the legislation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200901080001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:42:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Smith falsely suggested Obama stimulus plan will &#x22;cut taxes on people who don&#x27;t pay taxes&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200901070012</link>
<description>Fox News&#x27; Shepard Smith falsely suggested that a $500 individual tax credit, reportedly included in President-elect Barack Obama&#x27;s proposed economic recovery plan, would benefit people who don&#x27;t currently pay taxes, asking, &#x22;I know we don&#x27;t know the details yet, but $300 billion in tax cuts -- how do you cut taxes on people who don&#x27;t pay taxes?&#x22; In fact, all American workers are required to pay taxes on their wages for Social Security and Medicare under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200901070012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:34:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Hill&#x3C;/em&#x3E; asserted some &#x22;surprise[d]&#x22; &#x22;liberals&#x22; did not resist Obama&#x27;s &#x22;sudden turn to tax cuts,&#x22; ignored his campaign pledge to cut taxes</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200901060010</link>
<description>In an article about President-elect Barack Obama&#x27;s meetings with members of Congress to discuss a stimulus package, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Hill&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Mike Soraghan asserted, &#x22;To the surprise of some, congressional liberals offered up little initial resistance to the sudden turn to tax cuts.&#x22; But in referring to Obama&#x27;s purported &#x22;sudden turn to tax cuts,&#x22; Soraghan ignored Obama&#x27;s promise of tax cuts during the campaign, nor did Soraghan quote or name one person expressing &#x22;surprise&#x22; that &#x22;congressional liberals&#x22; would support tax cuts as part of a stimulus plan.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200901060010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:38:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cunningham on the poor: &#x22;They&#x27;re poor because they lack values, ethics, and morals&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200901050010</link>
<description>Echoing his previous attacks on the poor, radio host Bill Cunningham claimed that &#x22;poor people were not and are not poor because they lack money. They&#x27;re poor because they lack values, ethics, and morals.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200901050010</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:03:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;IBD&#x3C;/em&#x3E; cited 1930s America, 1990s Japan as evidence that stimulus spending doesn&#x27;t work, but economists disagree on both counts</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200901050007</link>
<description>In criticizing a large-scale economic stimulus plan favored by President-elect Barack Obama and congressional Democrats, an &#x3C;em&#x3E;Investor&#x27;s Business Daily&#x3C;/em&#x3E; editorial echoed other media by citing the New Deal and Japan&#x27;s &#x22;lost decade&#x22; as purported evidence that stimulus spending is &#x22;the least effective way to give the economy a boost.&#x22; However, according to prominent economists, economic conditions in 1930s America and 1990s Japan were improving following major increases in stimulus spending -- trends that were reversed only when the respective governments decided to cut spending and raise taxes in an attempt to reduce the deficit.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200901050007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Jan 2009 12:39:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; echoed opponents&#x27; distortion of EFCA in asserting it would &#x22;eliminat[e] the secret ballot&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200901050004</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid &#x22;back a card-check bill that would allow unionization of a workplace if the majority of employees sign union cards, eliminating the secret ballot that workers cast to decide whether to allow a union.&#x22; In fact, the Employee Free Choice Act does not eliminate employees&#x27; rights to a secret ballot; as &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported, &#x22;Business groups have attacked the legislation because it would take away &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;employers&#x27;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; right to insist on holding a secret-ballot election to determine whether workers favored unionization.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200901050004</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:40:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Consistent with Fox pattern, Chris Wallace used terminology favored by Employee Free Choice Act opponents</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200901040003</link>
<description>Consistent with a pattern on Fox News, Chris Wallace used a term echoed by opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act when he identified the EFCA as &#x22;union card check.&#x22; Wallace later acknowledged that he was using the terminology of one side of the debate on the bill.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200901040003</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:58:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fortune&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Easton misrepresented debate over Employee Free Choice Act</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812230011</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fortune&#x3C;/em&#x3E; magazine Washington editor Nina Easton asserted: &#x22;The union-backed Employee Free Choice Act eliminates secret ballots, and declares the union the winner if a majority of employees openly sign a petition.&#x22; In fact, the EFCA does not eliminate employees&#x27; rights to a secret ballot; as &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported, &#x22;Business groups have attacked the legislation because it would take away &#x3C;em&#x3E;employers&#x27;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; right to insist on holding a secret-ballot election to determine whether workers favored unionization&#x22; [emphasis added].</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812230011</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 19:58:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox, Barnes, Krauthammer echoed conservative claim that CRA played key role in subprime crisis</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812230007</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Special Report&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Fred Barnes and Charles Krauthammer echoed other conservatives in claiming that the Community Reinvestment Act and efforts to expand affordable housing are at least in part to blame for the home foreclosure crisis. But as experts have noted, the CRA does not govern the vast majority of subprime lenders.  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812230007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:47:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media cite Japan&#x27;s &#x22;lost decade&#x22; to criticize Obama&#x27;s economic stimulus plan, but economists disagree</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812220005</link>
<description>Numerous media figures have cited Japanese fiscal policy during the &#x22;lost decade&#x22; of the 1990s to criticize President-elect Barack Obama&#x27;s plan to undertake a large-scale stimulus program. These media figures ignore evidence that, according to prominent economists, economic conditions were improving in Japan before the Japanese government temporarily abandoned stimulus spending in an attempt to reduce the deficit.  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812220005</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:03:11 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dobbs on economic conditions: &#x22;Anyone paying attention is concerned and worried, but are you scared? Are you afraid? No. That&#x27;s un-American.&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812180010</link>
<description>On his radio show, Lou Dobbs played an audio clip of an interview in which Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, while discussing the global economy and the Canadian economy, was asked, &#x22;Are you scared?&#x22;* When Harper replied, &#x22;I&#x27;m very worried about the Canadian economy,&#x22; Lou Dobbs said: &#x22;Well, you know, we&#x27;re all concerned. We&#x27;re all worried. Anyone paying attention is concerned and worried, but are you scared? Are you afraid? No. That&#x27;s un-American.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812180010</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:47:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>MSNBC, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; echo GOP accusation that UAW killed bailout</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812120011</link>
<description>On-screen text at MSNBC and a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article and headline echoed the Republican accusation that the United Auto Workers union killed the $14 billion bailout for General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler. In fact, Senate Republicans refused to support legislation endorsed by the White House, a majority of members of the House and Senate, and the UAW.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812120011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:07:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media advance GOP talking point that UAW killed the auto bailout bill</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812120006</link>
<description>Media echoed the Republican accusation that the United Auto Workers union killed the $14 billion bailout for GM, Ford, and Chrysler. But &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;stated that it was Senate Republicans who &#x22;refused to support a bill endorsed by the White House and Congressional Democrats.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812120006</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:21:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Faced with economic turmoil, media conservatives turn to class warfare</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812100005</link>
<description>Even though the crises facing the financial and automotive industries were born primarily of the actions (or inaction) of those in positions of power in private industry and in government, many conservative media figures have assigned blame to specific groups of less wealthy or less influential people -- the poor, minorities, undocumented immigrants, and union members, among others -- disregarding the facts that belie such assignments of blame.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812100005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:19:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hannity falsely claimed that under Bush, &#x22;We created 10 million new jobs&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200812090014</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Hannity &#x26;amp; Colmes&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Sean Hannity stated that under President George W. Bush, &#x22;We created 10 million new jobs, lower unemployment than in the last four decades&#x27; average.&#x22; In fact, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the United States has gained 2,866,000 net private-sector jobs between 2001, when Bush took office, and the first quarter of 2008.    &#x3C;br /&#x3E;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200812090014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:56:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>