<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - E.D. Hill</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/e_d__hill</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: E.D. Hill</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; hosts ridiculed E.D. Hill&#x27;s &#x22;terrorist fist jab&#x22; comment: &#x22;Talk about self-parody&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806100007</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Morning Joe&#x3C;/em&#x3E; co-hosts Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski, and Willie Geist criticized Fox News&#x27; E.D. Hill for teasing a segment on Barack and Michelle Obama&#x27;s &#x22;fist bump&#x22; by saying, &#x22;A fist bump? A pound? A terrorist fist jab? The gesture everyone seems to interpret differently.&#x22; Brzezinski called Hill&#x27;s comment &#x22;idiotic,&#x22; and Geist said, &#x22;Talk about self-parody.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806100007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:11:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; E.D. Hill teased discussion of Obama dap: &#x22;A fist bump? A pound? A terrorist fist jab?&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200806060007</link>
<description>Teasing a segment on the &#x22;gesture everyone seems to interpret differently,&#x22; Fox News&#x27; E.D. Hill said: &#x22;A fist bump? A pound? A terrorist fist jab? ... We&#x27;ll show you some interesting body communication and find out what it really says.&#x22; In the ensuing discussion with a &#x22;body language expert,&#x22; Hill referred to the &#x22;Michelle and Barack Obama fist bump or fist pound,&#x22; but at no point did she explain her earlier reference to &#x22;a terrorist fist jab.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200806060007</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2008 18:24:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On at least 15 occasions on May 8, Fox News promoted notion that McCain is reluctant to discuss his POW experience</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805090011</link>
<description>On numerous May 8 programs, Fox News anchors and reporters promoted the notion that Sen. John McCain is reluctant to discuss his experience as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. In fact, as Media &#x3C;em&#x3E;Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E; has documented, McCain has repeatedly highlighted that experience.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805090011</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 19:36:15 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s E.D. Hill falsely claimed that &#x22;U.N. meteorologists&#x22; say &#x22;the planet may actually cool off for the 10th year in a row&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200804090013</link>
<description>On&#x3C;em&#x3E; America&#x27;s Pulse&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, host E.D. Hill falsely claimed, in a teaser for an upcoming segment, that &#x22;the U.N. says the planet may actually cool off for the 10th year in a row.&#x22; Hill later asserted: &#x22;U.N. meteorologists now saying that we could have, for the 10th year in a row, a colder year, temperatures ... decreasing, not warming, getting colder.&#x22; In fact, global mean temperatures, as measured in two widely used data sets, have not decreased in each of the past 10 years; further, according to those data sets&#x27; producers, the data continue to show a long-term warming trend.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200804090013</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Apr 2008 21:38:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Fox, &#x22;confused&#x22; Hill falsely claimed &#x22;the law that lets&#x22; U.S. officials &#x22;listen in to phone calls from overseas by known terrorists expired two weeks ago&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802290005</link>
<description>On Fox News&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;America&#x27;s Pulse&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, E.D. Hill falsely asserted, &#x22;[T]he law that lets them [U.S. intelligence agencies] listen in to phone calls from overseas by known terrorists expired two weeks ago.&#x22; In fact, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) did not expire; what expired were revisions to FISA under the Protect America Act, which, among other things, expanded the government&#x27;s authority to eavesdrop on Americans&#x27; domestic-to-foreign communications without a warrant.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802290005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:21:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Hill: Sen. Kennedy &#x22;is&#x22; the &#x22;hate speech and the partisanship that you&#x27;ve seen in Washington&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801280012</link>
<description>On Fox News, E.D. Hill, commenting on Sen. Edward M. Kennedy&#x27;s endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama, said: &#x22;[T]his is Barack Obama, who has -- I mean on his website, you look at it and sort of the whole thing is devoted to &#x27;I&#x27;m a man of change because I want to get away from all that -- the hate speech and the partisanship that you&#x27;ve seen in Washington.&#x27; Ted Kennedy, you know, is that.&#x22; Hill, however, offered no examples or evidence of Kennedy&#x27;s alleged &#x22;hate speech,&#x22; and Google and Nexis searches turned up no examples of Obama using the term &#x22;hate speech&#x22; to describe the political climate or discourse in Washington.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801280012</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:23:19 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Hill on Obama: &#x22; &#x27;I won&#x27;t wear &#x3C;em&#x3E;that&#x3C;/em&#x3E; [flag] pin&#x27; ... reminded me of the &#x27;I didn&#x27;t have sex with &#x3C;em&#x3E;that&#x3C;/em&#x3E; woman&#x27; &#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710050010</link>
<description>Responding to Barack Obama&#x27;s explanation for why he stopped wearing an American flag pin on his lapel during the lead-up to the Iraq war, because it had become &#x22;a substitute for, I think, true patriotism,&#x22; Fox News Live co-host E.D. Hill said: &#x22;When I heard this, actually, one of the direct quotes [of Obama] that got to me was &#x27;I won&#x27;t wear that pin.&#x27; It reminded me of the &#x27;I didn&#x27;t have sex with that woman.&#x27; &#x22; Fox legal analyst Andrew Napolitano then accused Obama of &#x22;disrespecting the American flag,&#x22; while his Fox News Radio co-host, Brian Kilmeade, said that Obama was &#x22;anti-Betsy Ross.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710050010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:51:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox News&#x27; Hill: Plame &#x22;skirt[ed] the issue&#x22; of whether she was covert in House testimony</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703160013</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox News Live&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, E.D. Hill asserted that &#x22;it
sounded like&#x22; former CIA operative Valerie Plame&#x27;s testimony to a House committee was &#x22;completely skirting
the issue of whether she still fell under those rules of being considered
covert&#x22; when her identity was leaked. In fact, Plame specifically testified that she
was &#x22;covert&#x22; until Robert Novak publicly revealed her identity in a 2003
column.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703160013</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:20:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Hill on Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;Southern drawl&#x22;: &#x22;[I]f she was attending, say, a GLAAD convention, would she speak with a lisp?&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703060009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:01:16 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Who are Sen. Clinton&#x27;s &#x22;evil men&#x22;? Media mind-readers can&#x27;t agree</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702010001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702010001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:41:12 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>E.D. Hill paired Michael J. Fox&#x27;s stem cell ad, RNC ad called &#x22;overtly racist&#x22; by Republican William Cohen as &#x22;negative ads ... one from each side&#x22;; let Card claim only &#x22;Democrats have a message of negativity&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200610260007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200610260007</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:10:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s E.D. Hill impersonates Helen Thomas</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200609060002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200609060002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:33:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fox&#x27;s Hill and Doocy confronted Horowitz with &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E; research</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090005</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, E.D. Hill and Steve Doocy confronted David Horowitz with &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters for America&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s August 2 item exposing the &#x22;doctored quotes, shoddy scholarship, factual errors, and baseless insinuations on matters both small and large&#x22; in Horowitz&#x27;s latest book, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Shadow Party&#x3C;/em&#x3E;.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200608090005</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Aug 2006 12:30:46 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; co-host Kilmeade advocated &#x22;Office of Censorship&#x22; in wake of &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; banking surveillance story</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200606290009</link>
<description>On June 29, several Fox News media figures suggested that the U.S. government should &#x22;put up the Office of Censorship&#x22; to screen news reports to determine whether they &#x22;hurt the country&#x22; or are of &#x22;news value,&#x22; in the wake of a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article disclosing a Treasury Department program designed to monitor international financial transactions.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200606290009</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:10:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E; further distorted flawed AP report on Reid&#x27;s boxing tickets</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200605310002</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Fox &#x26;amp; Friends&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, co-hosts Steve Doocy, E.D. Hill, and Brian Kilmeade discussed Associated Press staff writer John Solomon&#x27;s recent report that Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid had accepted free tickets to several Las Vegas boxing matches from the Nevada Athletic Commission (NAC) while &#x22;he was pressing legislation ... that [the NAC] feared might usurp its authority.&#x22; But like Solomon&#x27;s article, the hosts failed to note that Reid signed off on the bill the NAC opposed -- to create a federal boxing federation -- allowing its passage in the Senate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200605310002</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 14:29:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>