<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Dana Milbank</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/dana_milbank</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Dana Milbank</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>CNN&#x27;s five new &#x22;top political reporters and commentators&#x22; include reported McCain adviser, former RNC official, CBN&#x27;s Brody, and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Milbank</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808150002</link>
<description>CNN announced in a press release: &#x22;Brody, Castellanos, Milbank, Rosen, Wall Span Spectrum of U.S. Politics for CNN Analysis, Commentary ... CNN has added five more top political reporters and commentators to its deep bench of political contributors and analysts.&#x22; CNN&#x27;s new &#x22;top political reporters and commentators&#x22; that &#x22;[s]pan&#x22; the &#x22;[s]pectrum&#x22; include reported McCain adviser Alex Castellanos, former RNC official Tara Walls, Christian Broadcasting Network&#x27;s David Brody -- who once described a male blogger as Fred Thompson&#x27;s &#x22;angry girlfriend&#x22; -- and &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; columnist Dana Milbank.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808150002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:57:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ombudsman admonishes Milbank for using anonymous source, imputing meaning to secondhand quote</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808100002</link>
<description>Responding to reader complaints about &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Dana Milbank&#x27;s use of an &#x22;anonymous secondhand quotation from Sen. Barack Obama,&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ombudsman Deborah Howell chastised Milbank for citing the source anonymously and for imputing a particular interpretation to a quote he did not witness. Howell found that &#x22;[n]either [Jonathan] Weisman nor Milbank called the source&#x22; to confirm their interpretation of the quote.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808100002</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:52:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Weisman contradicts Milbank&#x27;s claim that both reporters believe disputed version of Obama&#x27;s &#x22;symbol&#x22; quote &#x22;was correct as written&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808080010</link>
<description>Discussing a disputed version of a comment Sen. Barack Obama reportedly made during a closed-door meeting with House Democrats, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Jonathan Weisman contradicted colleague Dana Milbank&#x27;s assertion that both Weisman and Milbank &#x22;believe the quote was correct as written, and that this supposed &#x27;context&#x27; is a recreation, after-the-fact, by Democratic aides who were worried about how the quote looked.&#x22; Weisman called his own position &#x22;a little more squishy&#x22; than Milbank&#x27;s.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808080010</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:42:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rather than acknowledge flaws in Obama column, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Milbank mocked critics in online chat as &#x22;whiners&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808010004</link>
<description>In an online discussion, Dana Milbank dismissed participants&#x27; criticisms of his July 30 column -- a &#x22;sketch&#x22; of Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s &#x22;premature presidency&#x22; -- as &#x22;whines.&#x22; Milbank began the discussion by acknowledging that &#x22;some of you have some thoughts you&#x27;d like to share about yesterday&#x27;s Sketch on the premature presidency of Barack Obama,&#x22; and before taking questions, wrote: &#x22;I&#x27;ve decided to approach today&#x27;s chat as a wine writer would. ... Today, I am inaugurating the Whine Enthusiast, in which I will rate your whines.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808010004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:14:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Milbank accuses Obama of &#x22;hubris&#x22; while cropping quotes, making false insinuations, and neglecting basic reporting</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807300009</link>
<description>In his &#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; column, Dana Milbank claimed that Sen. Barack Obama &#x22;has long been his party&#x27;s presumptive nominee. Now he&#x27;s becoming its presumptuous nominee.&#x22; As purported evidence, Milbank misrepresented quotes, neglected to do basic reporting, and advanced the baseless suggestion that actions Obama has reportedly taken are unprecedented for a presidential candidate.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807300009</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:29:39 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Washington Post&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Milbank on Hillary Clinton: &#x22;The press will savage her no matter what&#x22;  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712310001</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;On&#x3C;/em&#x3E; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;CNN&#x27;s &#x3C;em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;Reliable Sources, The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Dana Milbank said of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton that &#x22;[t]he press will savage her no matter what.&#x22; Indeed, Milbank himself has smeared Clinton or propagated misinformation about her.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712310001</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:19:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ignoring key  bill, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; Post&#x27;&#x3C;/em&#x3E;s Milbank attempted to refute  Obama&#x27;s statement that he &#x22;expanded health care in Illinois&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712170003</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Dana 
Milbank wrote that Sen. Barack Obama&#x27;s &#x22;signature legislation as a state 
senator, the Health Care Justice Act, merely set up a panel to craft a plan,&#x22; 
not, as Obama claimed, &#x22;expanded health care in Illinois by bringing Democrats 
and Republicans together, by taking on the insurance industry.&#x22; In fact, Obama 
sponsored a bill that expanded health insurance programs for low-income families 
in Illinois. 
Following that bill&#x27;s passage, more than 150,000 additional people reportedly 
received health insurance through the programs.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712170003</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:17:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Milbank compares Edwards&#x27; haircuts to undocumented workers at Romney&#x27;s home while &#x22;he&#x27;s complaining about illegal immigrants&#x22;  &#x3C;br /&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200712130001</link>
<description>On &#x3C;em&#x3E;Countdown&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, Keith Olbermann 
asked Dana Milbank about the repeated references in 
&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington 
P&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;ost&#x3C;/em&#x3E; 
to the cost of John 
Edwards&#x27; haircuts, including in his 
own column. Milbank replied that he is &#x22;guilty of the haircut 
slander&#x22; and added: &#x22;[T]he $400 dollar haircut speaks of that the 
same way Romney having the illegal immigrants twice return to work in his home 
even ... as he&#x27;s complaining about illegal immigrants.&#x22; While Milbank identified 
an inconsistency between Romney&#x27;s actions and his stated views, he offered no justification 
for suggesting a similar inconsistency in Edwards&#x27; efforts to fight poverty 
while paying for expensive 
haircuts.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200712130001</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:46:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E;  Milbank failed to note Shays&#x27; misrepresentation of Clyburn  comments</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710260009</link>
<description>In his column, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington 
Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Dana Milbank, referencing comments Democratic House Majority 
Whip James Clyburn made to the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post 
&#x3C;/em&#x3E;on July 30, wrote: &#x22;[Rep. Christopher] Shays condemned a House 
Democratic leader for saying that &#x27;if the Iraqi war went well it would be bad 
for Democrats.&#x27; &#x22; But Milbank did not provide Clyburn&#x27;s actual statement, nor 
did he note that Shays misrepresented Clyburn&#x27;s remarks.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710260009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:46:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cleavage within &#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E; &#x3C;/em&#x3E;over Givhan&#x27;s Clinton neckline coverage</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707270001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707270001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:17:58 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Dowd one of many to run with portrayal of Clinton as violent</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706210011</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706210011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:29:07 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The media&#x27;s assault on reason</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200706120005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200706120005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:19:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article on McCain speech falsely suggested he received &#x22;three standing ovations&#x22; for Iraq war stance</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703160004</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703160004</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:47:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; published column mocking Clinton as &#x22;Candidate Cliche,&#x22; left out substance of proposals</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200703090009</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200703090009</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Mar 2007 18:10:02 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Myths and falsehoods about Hillary Rodham Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130005</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200702130005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:12:33 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>