Sun, Oct 12, 2008 6:48pm ET

Send to a friend Print Version

Join the Discussion

Ignoring its own reporting, LA Times didn't note McCain's shifting time frame for balancing budget

Summary: The Los Angeles Times reported that Sen. John McCain "advocated for his tax cuts and his plan to balance the budget by 'the end of my term in office.' " But the Times did not note, as it has previously reported, that McCain has repeatedly shifted on his time frame for balancing the budget, originally claiming he would balance the budget in four years, then pledging to do so in eight years, before reversing himself again to return to the four-year pledge.
Read more

Threaded Comments: on / off

Post a new comment

You must be a registered user to post and flag comments on this site.
Please log in or sign up to post in this forum.

Posted by mr. l

Wow!  McCain used a brilliant one-liner to accuse all Chicago's politicians as lying.  What are they doing?  Trying to become a senator in Arizona?

Posted by mefirst

neither will balance the budget with the tax cuts they have proposed, although mccain will make it harder to achieve with his policy of give even more to those that already have.  the problem is that we are going to get to the point where we cannot deficit spend our way out of economic trouble, such as now, because we will be so deeply in debt it will do no good, and foreigners are not going to lend us the money.  we're a nation of adults, supposedly, and yet we cannot manage to operate on a budget, with income more or less equaling spending.  we all want, want, want, but don't want to pay for it.  we're borrowing money to subsidize tax cuts.  

Posted by mefirst in reply to mefirst

matt lauer trying to push the idea this morning on the today show that wall street tanked because of obama's rise in the polls.  apparently all those bank and business failures had nothing to do with it.   of course, when clinton raised taxes on the wealthy early in his administration that brought predictions of disaster from all the republicans, and the reverse happened.

Posted by carlileb5935

Is Robin Abcarian now writing news articles? So that's what happened to her.

In the past, Abcarian was nothing more than a very mediocre, light weight human interest columnist in the now defunct 'Family' section.

What a shameful demise, that L.A. Times.

Posted by tman418

To be honest, who knows for sure when the budget can be truly balanced. The only way to really start cutting the deficit to end this highly privatized Iraq War and end the no-bid and cost-plus contracts. If we have to keep a few troops there so be it but get those profit-seeking companies out. Just let the army do what it has always done in reconstruction/nation building.

Also, just a note to future presidents: during war time, you're supposed to RAISE TAXES so that the debt doesn't get passed on to our grandkids! And the longer we wait to pay it off, the more expensive it will be for them.

Posted by TadekKorn

McCain, who was responsible for two plane crashes prior to the one that landed him at the Hanoi Hilton, probably didn't need any more flying lessons.  Nor did he need any more lessons in ethics after being repremanded for his lapses by the House Ethics Committee.  Now, despite his admitted ignorance of the economy, he prides himself in needing no lessons from anyone in Chicago, home of Milton Friedman's free market economic theories which he supported.  McCain, who graduated fifth from the bottom of his class will continue to pride himself by making sure that he learns nothing from anyone because he knows everything!  Coupled with Palin who can't remember the names of any newspapers she reads we have a winning team to continue in the literary tradition of George W. Bush!

Posted by peebs755 in reply to TadekKorn

Actually I beleive the crash that got him into the Hanoi Hilton was his fifth plane.

Posted by wzwriter

GRAMPS McCAIN: I don't need lessons about telling the truth to the American people.

Because you can't teach an old dog new tricks.  :-)

Posted by shoes89

This is "conservative m isinformation"?

Yet again - MM takes an article that is largely unflattering of McCain, finds something to take issue with, and presents a false perception that the LA Times is somehow against Obama.

Meanwhile, nothing can be further from the truth. The LA Times is viruently pro-Obama. They're not even hiding it anymore! The paper's pro-Obama position has been very well documented.

Posted by steeve in reply to shoes89

"The LA Times is virulently pro-Obama" -- take out "virulently" and I'll agree with you.  Unfortunately, reality is pro-Obama too.  What's a newspaper to do?