Hmmm, the deal that McLame "suspended" his campaign for and subsequently took credit for making it happen collapsed today, and the "liberal" media is talking about a clinton endorsement or lack therof. How bout that "liberal" media!

clinton's complete answer is on the brewer thread.  if you actually look at it, someone had to take the time to remove the middle section of what he said and make it appear as if hillary had to tell him to go to the meeting with obama in harlem.  what the "go help him" phrase clear referenced was previous times bill had helped him.  it was edited to make clinton say something he did not say.

Of course Billy wants Obama to fail. He wants Hillary to have a chance in four years. She would be far better than Barry Obama.

Ah, the justly famous wingnut mind reading skills in full bloom.

How many fingers am I holding up?

If you're a rightwinger, that would be three, with the thumb and index finger properly inserted to withdraw another talking point! ;)

Right wingers spout nothing but bogus talking points while the intellectual left wing giants around here present factual analysis with the seriousness it deserves, along with smart, witty commentary that would make Bill Maher jealous.

"Wingnuts", whew, that is some pretty good stuff.

Oh, Bucey, you really hurt my feelings with that! I think I should argue against anything you say from here on out because you hurt my feelings with that blindly partisan speech. If you only had refrained from saying anything to hurt my feelings, I would probably have agreed with you. But since you hurt my feelings, I am compelled to disagree with every single thing  you say - because you hurt my feelings. My feelings are way more important than doing something that requires putting partisanship aside and bail out wall street. So brucey, stop hurting my feelings. You are just a mean ol' cranky old man. Meaney. No, really.

Snoop, I know what you're so delicately getting at:  Bruce has as his mentor mean 'ole John Boehner, who got his own feelins hurt so bad by Rep. Pelosi that he couldn't do anything except hold a press conference about a speech she gave.  She has this power over him.  It's all too much.

Ole Boehner is the one who blamed the troops for the Iraq mess a while back:

http://www.americablog.com/2006/11/republican-house-leader-blames-troops.html

Hey Snoopy, I strongly believe that any Republican that changed his vote due to what Pelosi had to say is complertely wrong.

I also think Pelosi was wrong for saying what she said at that time.

Did any of these people really want the bill to pass?

nothing but talking points, right?

If Andrea Mitchell appears to favor the Republicans, it's perhaps because she actually does.  Let's bear in mind that for the last 11 years she's been married to Alan Greenspan, Federal Reserve Chairman until 2006.  As such, he probably bears a good share of the responsibility for the current economic fiasco.  It would not be inconsistent or unusual for Andrea's perspective to be tinged by her allegiance to the Republican ideology and linked to her husband's legacy.

You've got the picture, TADEKKORN.  It should be a conflict of interest concern when someone is a "talker" on a "news" program is related to someone who is or was connected to the administration.  What about old Karl Rove?  Of course it's Fox "News".  Since there seems to be no law or even shame at this practice, what better way to stack the deck than hiring professional shills sit at a desk?  Are there NO independent journalists out there?  Are there any "journalists" out there?  

short answer, NO.

Long answer, If there are, they don't work for the television media.