Join the Discussion
Hannity accuses Obama of "outright falsehood" in saying Fox News -- home of the "terrorist fist jab" smear -- has suggested he is Muslim
Summary: On Hannity & Colmes, Alan Colmes stated that "there are those who have said" that Sen. Barack Obama is a Muslim, but "it's not a Fox thing." On his radio show, Sean Hannity also said that "[n]o one has ever suggested that" Obama is a Muslim. In fact, Fox News hosts -- one of whom asked if an affectionate gesture by the Obamas was "a terrorist fist jab" -- have repeatedly promoted false reports about Obama's religion, including the false report that Obama was educated in a madrassa.
Read more
Threaded Comments: on / off
Posted by magnolialover
Does Hannity realize that there are these things called video recorders. When he, or someone on his station says things like this, they are recorded, and can be reviewed, you know, later, to prove him a fool once more. Jeesh... This is another Hannity challenge, like he seems to do every week, saying, "So and so said that I called him anti American because he's not with the President. I never said that, and can't remember any republican calling someone terrorist sympathizers and anti american just because they didn't agree with the president..." and of the of course, roll about 10 pages of quotes from republicans saying exactly that.
Hannity, out to lunch, permanently. Is it possible for one man to be so stupid?
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 12:50:23 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to magnolialover
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 12:55:43 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to IRONY 101
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 12:59:00 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to magnolialover
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:04:31 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by nerzog in reply to magnolialover
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 12:56:11 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wzwriter in reply to nerzog
Is it possible for 50 million people to be so stupid? Apparently..... yes.
That's why Adam Sandler movies are so popular......
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:35:40 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by neon desert in reply to wzwriter
That's why there are instructions on shampoo bottles.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:21:50 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking in reply to neon desert
I figure if you're old enough to read the warning, you're already aware of the danger.
And if your old enough to read and you still don't know how dangerous falling from an open window is, maybe the gene pool would be better off without you.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 8:09:09 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Missouri Democrat in reply to worrierking
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 12:31:41 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by mrhebert74 in reply to magnolialover
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:30:01 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to mrhebert74
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:37:21 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Kyle_Broflovski in reply to IRONY 101
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:40:44 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to Kyle_Broflovski
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:58:33 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by pithaughn in reply to IRONY 101
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 6:19:50 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by NiceguyEddie in reply to IRONY 101
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 9:05:43 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wzwriter in reply to magnolialover
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:08:23 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by shaggles
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:05:43 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by DAWUSS
People talk about Obama's "Muslim faith", especially once they make the assertion that Obama is a Muslim. And even if were, WTH is wrong with THAT? There is a difference between being a Muslim and being a Muslim Terrorist.
Of course, that line gets blurred or distinguished when it benefits either side.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:16:50 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by neon desert
So easily confused because Obama neglected to add air quotes when he said "my Muslim faith"...
Is there already an adjective "hannity"? Because there apparently is a need for a word that "dumb" just can't fill.
"My dog is so hannity that he chases parked cars."
"I'm sorry, but there's nothing we can do. Your son is just hannity."
I had some others, but they all sounded kind of hannity...
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:28:53 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking in reply to neon desert
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:08:03 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by neon desert in reply to worrierking
True. I was only trying to insult my dog, not be cruel to him.
Unfortunately, that was a really hannity statement, and I apologize.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:13:27 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to worrierking
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:42:22 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by neon desert in reply to IRONY 101
The word "hannity" is an adjective, and should be used thusly:
"The truthiness of Dick Morris is so hannity that it mootifies Fox News as a credible source."
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:34:36 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wzwriter in reply to neon desert
The word "hannity" is an adjective, and should be used thusly:
"The truthiness of Dick Morris is so hannity that it mootifies Fox News as a credible source."
Sean Insanity has been trying to use his name as a verb. I think the verb form should be used as follows:
"Once the brain scan showed the patient had no brain activity, the doctor said that the patient had been hannitized.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:10:16 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by mary59 in reply to wzwriter
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 11:22:08 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wzwriter in reply to IRONY 101
Better yet... "Don't step in that dog hannity." ;>)
I'll be right back - I have to go to the bathroom and take a hannity.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:40:42 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by neon desert in reply to wzwriter
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 7:06:53 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by jumboburrito
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:41:41 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by watershed
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:43:52 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by peace4all
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 1:48:11 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by shaggles
This is how the right works. It's likely that you won't find a FOX News reporter or a prominent Republican saying this exact sentence: "Barack Obama is a Muslim." The "terrorist fist jab", "he was educated in a madrassa(?)", etc. won't be enough for them. They will continue to say "No one ever said Barack Obama is a Muslim."
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:00:06 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by snoopy
OT, but gee, McCain's daughter Meg, the daughter of the famous P.O.W. John "P.O.W." McCain, says only her family can understand what war is about. Period! (from thinkprogress if the link isn't working)
Meghan McCain: ‘No one knows what war is like other than my family. Period.’»
In an interview on the Today Show this morning, host Meredith Vieira asked Meghan McCain about Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) comments that Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) “doesn’t get it.” Meghan responded by pointing to her dad’s service in Vietnam and her two brothers who are currently enlisted. She then went a step further, however, saying that her family is the only family that understands war:
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:01:17 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to snoopy
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:05:05 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by DAWUSS in reply to snoopy
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:44:20 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to DAWUSS
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:48:19 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to snoopy
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:53:45 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by darkmass in reply to magnolialover
"Talk about a terrorist propaganda bonanza if one of them, or both of them were killed in a combat zone." - Magnolialover
Unfortunately, that's kind of a naive perspective. What it would really do (terrorist propaganda point or not) is freakin guarantee a McCain/Palin win. You have to keep in mind how the mind of the general public operates.
Oh and by the way, my money's on al-Quada flat praying for a McCain presidency.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:16:20 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by National_Insecurity in reply to darkmass
I'm sure Ayman al Zawahiri has already written the script and shot the video for October release. Have you notice the quality of al Qaeda videos are better these days? I'm certain they aren't living in caves, but have a nice compound with electricity, sat TV reception, good water, nice food, and apparently Arabian horses according to Dexter Filkins.
Has it been verified that "Afghanistan" was never uttered from the podium at the RNC in St. Paul? I literally can't fathom the insanity...or the hannity of it all.
I would like to propose a really stupid, just beyond absurd statement, should be a "hannity." As in, "I can't fathom the hannity of it."
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 1:28:08 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to snoopy
Snoop,
I watched that interview this morning and came away with the young McCain saying that nobody knows more about war than her family in the same vein that nobody knows more about being an African American than an African American. She even said she was biased (about her family and father) so it was not meant to be elitist or derogatory as you seem to imply.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:29:28 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by beinemac in reply to anotheramerican
That is probably what she wanted to say, but what she ACTUALLY said was,
"No one knows what war is like other than my family. Period."
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:35:33 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to beinemac
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:46:35 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to anotheramerican
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:25:55 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican
Islam runs in Obama's dad's family and anyone paying attention knows it just as they knows Obama is a Christian and his former pastor is Reverend Wright. Some bomb throwers on the right like to taunt those on the left by using Obama's middle name. (It works every time.)
If McCain's middle name were Adolph, you can bet the left would be all over it.
This is one of those mindless off-topic subjects that take up time and space in the media and give people something to argue about.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:07:48 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wzwriter in reply to anotheramerican
If McCain's middle name were Adolph, you can bet the left would be all over it.
It's enough for many of is on the left to know that George W. Bush's grandfather helped bankroll the Third Reich.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:11:13 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by RoberttheP in reply to wzwriter
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:14:58 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wzwriter in reply to RoberttheP
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:26:53 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by RoberttheP in reply to wzwriter
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:30:28 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to RoberttheP
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:51:30 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by watershed in reply to magnolialover
Pwned!!!111!
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:31:55 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by RoberttheP in reply to magnolialover
I absoultely could care less about William Ayers or what he did, he is not running for President, Senator Obama is. For that matter I dont care about the Rev Wright either. And I believe most Americans feel the same, which is why this good man won his partys nomination.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:34:54 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to RoberttheP
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:40:55 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by RoberttheP in reply to magnolialover
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:41:56 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to magnolialover
Mags,
I simply point out the facts. If McCain had started his political career in David Duke's house, you'd be a little suspicious about him too.
Or, since Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist bomber and so is bin Laden, lets say Obama started out his career in bin Laden's cave 12 years ago? What would you think then? Both Ayers and bin Laden are terrorist bombers are they not? Both are unrepentant are they not? Both wish they could have done more, do they not?
Go ahead and keep bringing it up. This association should have disqualified Obama from serious consideration for the Office of the Presidency a long time ago. Obama is the one who willingly associated with an unrepentant Anti-American terrorist bomber and saw nothing wrong with it. I question Obama's world view and have serious reservations about how he would handle the leaders in Iran, North Korea, and Russia. His talk simply does not match his walk.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:39:43 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to anotheramerican
Both Ayers and bin Laden are terrorist bombers are they not?
I keep on asking you this and you won't reply: What did Ayers bomb?
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:49:11 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to loonz
Loonz,
I didn't know you asked that. Do you not keep up? He and his Weathermen Underground exploded terrorist bombs at the United States Capital building, The NYC Police Headquarters and other places.
Take a look at this excerpt from Wikopedia:
In a bombing that took place on February 16, 1970, and that was credited to the Weathermen at the time,[26][27] a pipe bomb filled with heavy metal staples and lead bullet projectiles was set off on the ledge of a window at the Park Station of the San Francisco Police Department. In the blast, Brian V. McDonnell, a police sergeant, was fatally wounded while Robert Fogarty, another police officer, received severe wounds to his face and legs and was partially blinded.[28]Weatherman leader Bernardine Dohrn has been suspected of involvement in the February 16, 1970, bombing of the Park Police Station in San Francisco. At the time, Dohrn was said to be living with a Weatherman cell in a houseboat in Sausalito, California, unnamed law enforcement sources later told KRON-TV.[29] An investigation into the case was reopened in 1999,[30] and a San Francisco grand jury looked into the incident, but no indictments followed,[29] and no one was ever arrested for the bombing.[30] An FBI informant, Larry Grathwohl, who successfully penetrated the organization from the late summer of 1969 until April 1970, later testified to a U.S. Senate subcommittee that Bill Ayers, then a high-ranking member of the organization and a member of its Central Committee (but not then Dohrn's husband), had said Dohrn constructed and planted the bomb. Grathwohl testified that Ayers had told him specifically where the bomb was placed (on a window ledge) and what kind of shrapnel was put in it. Grathwohl said Ayers was emphatic, leading Grathwohl to believe Ayers either was present at some point during the operation or had heard about it from someone who was there.[31] In a book about his experiences published in 1976, Grathwohl wrote that Ayers, who had recently attended a meeting of the group's Central Committee, said Dohrn had planned the operation, made the bomb and placed it herself.[32] In 2008, author David Freddoso commented that "Ayers and Dohrn escaped prosecution only because of government misconduct in collecting evidence against them".[31][33]
[edit] Initial New York City Bombings
Early on the morning of February 21, 1970 as his family slept, three gasoline-filled firebombs exploded at at home of New York State Supreme Court Justice Murtagh at the northern tip of Manhattan. The same night, bombs were thrown at a police car in Manhattan and two military recruiting stations in Brooklyn.
Judge Murtagh was presiding over the trial of the so-called “Panther 21,” members of the Black Panther Party indicted in a plot to bomb New York landmarks and department stores. The side-walk in front of his home had three sentences of blood-red graffiti: "FREE THE PANTHER 21; THE VIET CONG HAVE WON; KILL THE PIGS."
Only a few weeks after the attack, the New York contingent of the Weathermen blew themselves up making more bombs in a Greenwich Village townhouse (see below). The same cell had bombed Judge Murtagh's house, according to Ron Jacobs in The Way the Wind Blew: A History of the Weather Underground. In late November of 1970, a letter to the Associated Press signed by Bernardine Dohrn, now Bill Ayers's wife, promised more bombings.[34]
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:54:18 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to anotheramerican
Sorry for the small print.
Take a look at Wikopedia - Search for Anti Personel bomb set on window ledge in San Francisco where a policeman was killed and another seriously injured.
Informants link that to Dorhn and Ayers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weatherman_(organization)#Anti-personnel_bomb_set_on_window-ledge_in_San_FranciscoPosted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:56:31 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to anotheramerican
Again my apologies. I am cutting and pasting these links into notepad before pasting them into MMFA but for some reason they are shrinking in font.
You'll have to go look it up yourself if you want to see more.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:58:11 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by neon desert in reply to anotheramerican
Oh yeah? Well check this out:
.............................................................................................................................................................
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:20:57 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by neon desert in reply to neon desert
Shoot. The font pasted much smaller than it appeared when I copied it.
Oh well, it basically proved that Bill Ayers dove into the frigid waters of the Colorado river in January to save a tightly tied burlap bag stuffed with puppies which McCain had stolen from some disabled orphans in Tuscon and tried to dispose of.
You'll have to look it up and research it yourself...
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:28:56 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by foghornleghorn in reply to neon desert
stuffed with puppies
I thought the bag was filled with embryos.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:52:46 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by neon desert in reply to foghornleghorn
You're just being ridiculous.
What would disabled orphans in Tuscon be doing with a bag of embryos? Sheesh...
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 7:09:12 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to anotheramerican
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:31:26 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by ex-punk in reply to loonz
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 2:56:40 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by MissDee in reply to loonz
"If he was a terrorist bomber, he would have gone to prison."
In the cell right next to Bin Laden's??
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 7:53:16 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Col. Harlan Sanders in reply to MissDee
Oh, MissDeeranged, what is it about you and failure?
Are you implying that the Bush administration is just too incompetent to apprehend Ayers? He lives right in the area with a full time job and a permanent address. No wonder they failed to get Bin Laden.
LOL! ;0) LOL ;0)
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 11:07:17 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to anotheramerican
I've been looking over different articles and it appears that even though Ayers' participation in the bombings is unknowable (the informant's info could be true or false; Ayers can't tell the difference between fact and fiction; and I'm still looking for information to back up Freddoso claim), he certainly wasn't against bombing vacant buildings.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 6:35:30 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:50:36 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to achrispage6992
Arch,
It is not me who is making something out of nothing. It is a fact that Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-American terrorist.
I for one, do not want to gamble the office of the Presidency on someone who has such ties. I question Obama's judgment and world view by consciously associating with this ultra radical, anti-American, terrorist bomber and wife who both declared war on the United States and should both be in jail.
Ayers and Dohrn are the antithesis of what democracy is all about. They are the same in spirit and deed as bin Laden.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:05:21 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to achrispage6992
Exactly my point. Ayers once contributed $200 to OBama's first campaign. He served on the same board as Ayers. And that's it. They're not friends. Ayers did not have a campaign event at his house for Obama.
"Both Obama and Ayers were members of the board of an anti-poverty group, the Woods Fund of Chicago, between 1999 and 2002. In addition, Ayers contributed $200 to Obama's re-election fund to the Illinois State Senate in April 2001, as reported here. They lived within a few blocks of each other in the trendy Hyde Park section of Chicago, and moved in the same liberal-progressive circles."
From: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/02/obamas_weatherman_connection.html
You keep repeating these things AA, as if they were truth, they are not. Your analogy of Ayers, Duke, Bin Laden, and Obama are weak at best. George W. Bush is good friends with the royal family of Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabian citizens provide the bulk of funding for terrorist activities around the world, so that must mean that Bush is a terrorist? See how that works? It doesn't. Which is the same for Obama's ties to Ayers. Given that, when Ayers and his group were active, Obama was 8 years old as well, and didn't help out with those activities.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:05:21 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to anotheramerican
NO HE DOESN'T.
Ayers, contributed $200 to Obama's early campaign. That's it. They were the members of the same board. They are not friends. They never hung around with each, and weren't close. They lived in the same neighborhood. That's it. He only had brief contact with Ayers, and probably couldn't pick him out of a police line up if asked.
Stop making things up.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:07:10 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to magnolialover
Mags,
I did not say Obama bombed anyone. I question his judgment and world view for associating with a radical leftist terrorist bomber even 25 years after the fact.
I only took a quick perusal of your note so maybe I missed it. Correct me if I am wrong, but I didn't see any reference to Obama starting his political career in Ayers and Dorhn's living room.
I'll go look again.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:10:03 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to magnolialover
“I can remember being one of a small group of people who came to Bill Ayers’ house to learn that Alice Palmer was stepping down from the senate and running for Congress,” said Dr. Quentin Young, a prominent Chicago physician and advocate for single-payer health care, of the informal gathering at the home of Ayers and his wife, Dohrn. “[Palmer] identified [Obama] as her successor.”
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8630.htmlObama and Palmer “were both there,” he said.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:13:22 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to anotheramerican
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:10:50 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to anotheramerican
rats..
The link is http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8630.html
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:15:00 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to anotheramerican
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:15:13 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to magnolialover
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:31:35 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to magnolialover
Exactly. Obama was introduced to some of the politcally active people in the neighborhood by the state senator he was going to replace. In AA's world that is an endorsement of domestic terrorism.
The politico article even mentions (towards the end I believe) that there is no indication that Obama and Ayers weren't just existing in overlapping circles of Chicago politics at the time. AA is apparently delusional and has less than nothing here as has been shown repeatedly.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:41:57 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by foghornleghorn in reply to magnolialover
George W. Bush is good friends with the royal family of Saudi Arabia
Exactly. And Bush was in business with BIN LADEN'S BROTHER!
A little too cozy, if you ask me. But to AA, that's unimportant. What's really important is a $200 campaign contribution, not the deaths of 3,000 people and our president's connection (albeit loose) to it. Coincidence?
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:56:22 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to anotheramerican
What about the head of the secessionist group that Palin spoke in front of last year? I heard some quotes from him on the radio yesterday that were straight up anti American, as in, "I hate the US, and everything that it stands for.." Seems fairly anti American to me.
Ayers was NOT anti American either. He was anti Vietnam war. Do I condone the methods he and his buddies used? Absolutely not. Is he anti American? Absolutely not.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:08:54 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to magnolialover
Mags,
Got any links? I am waiting to see if it is true.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:16:23 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by friedbergboy1422 in reply to anotheramerican
AIP:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-brooks4-2008sep04,0,5675222.column
Here is a video clip of her addressing the AIP:
http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2008/09/sarah-palin-to-alaskan-secessionists.html
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 8:26:40 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican
It is a fact that Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-American terrorist
You keep saying that like you believe if you say it so many times it will become the truth. Again, what is the extent of their relationship? Are they buddies? Do they talk often? Is there any evidence which indicates Obama is in agreement with the political philosphy or actions of Ayers? All you got is a one time visit to Ayers home to attend a fundraiser years ago and that the two served ona board with 28 other people together. Is that your proof that "Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-american terrorist?" Is that really all you got? If so you should be ashamed of yourself. Ashamed.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:21:34 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican
"They are the same in spirit and deed as bin Laden."--AA
Hahaha! That has got to be the hyperbole of the day. Ayers destroyed empty rest rooms. Rush Limbaugh has done more damage after eating a burrito than Ayers ever did. I doubt you would say the same about him.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:11:35 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican
It is a fact that Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-American terrorist
You keep saying that like you believe if you say it so many times it will become the truth. Again, what is the extent of their relationship? Are they buddies? Do they talk often? Is there any evidence which indicates Obama is in agreement with the political philosphy or actions of Ayers? All you got is a one time visit to Ayers home to attend a fundraiser years ago and that the two served ona board with 28 other people together. Is that your proof that "Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-american terrorist?" Is that really all you got? If so you should be ashamed of yourself. Ashamed.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:21:36 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by friedbergboy1422 in reply to anotheramerican
And McCain calls G. Gordon Liddy a friend. Remember when Liddy urged the Branch Davidians to shoot the ATF in the head?
Why is McCain friends with someone who advocates the murder of federal agents, AA?
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 8:22:17 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to open_mind
Open,
There is credible evidence that Ayers and Dohrn killed a policeman in San Francisco. There are other bombings too.
Ayers fiance at the time blew herself up making a bomb to be set off at an Army dance.
I am amazed that those on the left here will defend a terrorist bomber and make light of his anti-American, criminal, and terrorist behavior.
Kool aid anyone?
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:20:03 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican
It is a fact that Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-American terrorist
You keep saying that like you believe if you say it so many times it will become the truth. Again, what is the extent of their relationship? Are they buddies? Do they talk often? Is there any evidence which indicates Obama is in agreement with the political philosphy or actions of Ayers? All you got is a one time visit to Ayers home to attend a fundraiser years ago and that the two served ona board with 28 other people together. Is that your proof that "Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-american terrorist?" Is that really all you got? If so you should be ashamed of yourself. Ashamed.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:20:29 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by mescal in reply to anotheramerican
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:30:02 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to achrispage6992
Achris,
It is Ayers who should be ashamed but is not.
It is Obama who's judgment is so lacking that he associated with a known terrorist that may not be shameful but it sure is questionable.
I know it is inconvenient to be reminded of these facts. After all, who wants to have it known their candidate associated freely with anti-American terrorist bombers?
Obviously there are a lot of you. :-)
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:38:22 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican
This is what makes me have pretty negative view of partisans. Thanks for reminding me why I am not one.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 6:11:00 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican
It is Obama who's judgment is so lacking that he associated with a known terrorist that may not be shameful but it sure is questionable.
Again AA, what is the esxtent of this "association" you continue to preach about? Does it go beyond a one time attendance at Ayers house and serving on a board with 28 other people? Are you really using those two examples to make the assertion that Obama "associates" with known terrorist?
I know it is inconvenient to be reminded of these facts. After all, who wants to have it known their candidate associated freely with anti-American terrorist bombers?
Throughout this thread I have asked you what are these "facts" you keep referring to which prove this relationship is anything more than what I and the others here are pointing out? Just answer the damned question!
Obviously there are a lot of you. :-)
That smiley face means nothing to me. How dare you even insinuate that I would be happy with a candidate who has some kind of secretive approving relationship with a terrorist. Aren't you the one who gave some kind of simpleton excuse on why you didn't serve your country? You sir, have essentially questioned my patriotism, patriotism of which I have more in my little finger than you do in your entire cowardly body.
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 11:14:48 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican
"There is credible evidence that Ayers and Dohrn killed a policeman in San Francisco. There are other bombings too."--AA
Good. Where is/are the indictment(s) then? BTW, you need to wipe off your grape mustache.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:57:50 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to open_mind
Open,
The absence of an indictment does not mean there is no reason for suspicion. Were it not for the FBI messing up, both Ayers and Dohrn would most likelybe in jail or at least have served. You forget that Ayers and Dohrn were fugitives for years. Other members of their group went off and did kill others. Ayers fiance at the time was killed making a bomb to blow up at a dance.
It may be that Obama's repeated connections to Ayers and Dohrn are innocent. But it doesn't resolve the fact that Obama and Ayers hung out in the same groups and shared the same political and social views.
If you think all that is oaky, it is fine with me. However there are enough connections to Ayers, Dohrn, Wright, and Pflager, plus his community organizer days using following the teachings of Alinsky, (who by the way, dedicated one of his books to the devil,) to tell me Obama is a radical leftist. Like a leapord cannot change it's spots, Obama cannot change his past. I personally do not want someone who associated with such a group of anti-American's like this as our President.
ps. Off subject, I hear Wright has now been named in wrongful termination lawsuit as having an affair with a plaintiff in Texas. *sigh*
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 10:16:12 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Col. Harlan Sanders in reply to anotheramerican
Barney, if there was a point, or anything of substance in that post, it was completely smothered by your hysterical repetition, unsupported smears and trivia.
You may have just finally figured out that you're too far gone to ever have any credibility here, and have decided to throw as much BS against the wall as you can. That's fine, you've got nothing to lose, but I'm wondering why you continue to post here when you've obviously given up.
I hope you don't think you're going to persuade those who are more rational and well-informed than you. If you're just venting for therapeutic reasons, why don't you do it at FreeReepublc or another wingnut site? You'll get positive reinforcement instead of the ridicule you get here, and you won't be taking up thread space and wasting the time of those who are really interested in the topics.
No charge for the advice, and I don't expect a response.
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 11:24:16 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by armadillo in reply to Col. Harlan Sanders
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 9:35:33 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican
AA,
There is no substance to those "connections" at all. Your claim that Obama and Ayers "hung out in the same groups and shared the same political and social views." is meaningless without specifics. Are you claiming they were buddies? No. Are you claiming that Obama agrees with bombing the government? No. Is it your position that Ayers cannot have any legitimate views on politics and social views that might be shared by regular people? I notice you don't mention those shared views for what I believe is a lack of ability on your part and others to even back them up legitimately.
I think you have been reading too many things uncritically to have any real credibility here. I write that with all due respect.
I need something substantial to hang my hat on. What you have written does not even come close to meeting that threshold.
Posted Thursday September 11, 2008 12:54:14 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by foghornleghorn in reply to anotheramerican
will defend a terrorist bomber...
No, we dismiss it as irrelevant. Was he prosecuted? Imprisoned? Exiled out of the U.S.?
You, however, have drank the kool-aid and continue to cling to exagerrations about Ayers as "proof" of Obama's lack of judgement.
Again, why not read about the Bush family's connections with the Bin Ladens and then you might gain a little perspective and leave Ayers to the dustpile of history.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 6:00:31 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to foghornleghorn
Were the siblings of bin Laden bombers? If my critique of Obama were connections to a sister or brother of Ayers, you might have a point.
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 10:00:34 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican
Posted Thursday September 11, 2008 12:56:17 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by albertsenj in reply to anotheramerican
You keep repeating yourself as if THAT will make it the truth.
'there is evidence' isn't proof.
There is evidence that you have no functional mind of your own, spouting GOP talking points, and pushing your points even after they have been thoroughly discredited here.
Now, if I copy & paste the above sentence - what is the magical number of times? - will you in fact have no functioning mind?
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 1:53:17 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to albertsenj
Albert,
Nice strawman. I never said it was.
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 10:22:22 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by pearlene_scott1602 in reply to anotheramerican
There is credible evidence that Ayers and Dohrn killed a policeman in San Francisco. There are other bombings too.
Jesus Christ AA!
Buy a clue!
If there was CREDIBLE evidence THEY WOULD BE IN JAIL!!!!!!
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 2:17:08 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by mescal in reply to pearlene_scott1602
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 4:00:20 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to pearlene_scott1602
Pearlene,
Your argument falls apart with two letters: O.J.
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 10:21:09 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican
But your evidence doesn't even reach the level of OJ. OJ had a trial because an evidentury threshold had been crossed.
A grand jury chose not to indict Ayers in 2002 - a decade after Ayers previous charges were dropped due to prosecutorial misconduct in a different matter. The grand jury did not think there was enough credible evidence to indict - which was not the case with OJ.
I have to love your attempt at logic here though. One presumably guilty man goes free - therefore anyone merely accused of a crime, but not found guilty is likely guilty. Great logic.
Posted Thursday September 11, 2008 1:02:59 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wzwriter in reply to RoberttheP
Grow up and move on.
I'm 55 years old, Bob - I grew up years ago. And I won't "move on" as long as there are stupid people in the world like you.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:19:51 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by RoberttheP in reply to wzwriter
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:35:28 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to RoberttheP
Bob,
It does no good to insult people and only diminishes the good points you have made.
Of course people here will disagree with you, especially if you are not a liberal/progressive.
It is the discussion that is fun. The insults are unnecessary. I've been down that road and found it to be a waste of time and energy.
ps. However a good zinger now and then is fun. :-)
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:49:45 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by foghornleghorn in reply to anotheramerican
It is the discussion that is fun
Yeah, it's all fun and games to you - lies, smears, all in the name of a little innocent "fun". People are dying due to these same sorts of lies and you say that it is fun.
Grow up.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 6:02:40 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to foghornleghorn
Fog,
I hope you are enjoying your ride on that high horse. :-)
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 10:33:27 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican
"Of course people here will disagree with you, especially if you are not a liberal/progressive."--AA
Project much? I don't disagree with bob because he is "not a liberal/progressive" I disagree with him because I think he is wrong. I have no problem agreeing with non liberal/progressives and never have had a problem with it.
It is enlightening that you think people here are like that though. Perhaps it says more about the way you think.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 6:14:45 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to open_mind
You prove my point.
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 10:25:00 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican
I am sure somewhere in your mind your post made sense.
Posted Thursday September 11, 2008 1:04:57 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wzwriter in reply to RoberttheP
The only stupid person is you, but whatever. 55 ? Sure and i am 108.
I was born in 1952, and my birthday is in two months. You do the math, if you can.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:51:27 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Semiauto in reply to anotheramerican
AA sad: Islam runs in Obama's dad's family
Runs in the family? Is that like blond hair or cute dimples? Also you are missing the point that they are not trying to link him to Muslims, but to the muslims we are fighting around the world. That is the subtle association they are trying to make.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:17:03 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to Semiauto
I disagree. The pundits I have seen/heard using Obama's middle name sound to me like they are simply tweaking those on the left.
Those who would not vote for Obama because of his name or father's family religious heritage would not have voted for him anyway.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:36:23 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by peebs755 in reply to anotheramerican
Obama met his Father once, for a month long visit. His Father's religion had nothing to do with Obama's life. The right IS trying to link him to Muslim extremists. If they weren't, why bring it up repeatedly? Ms. Palin has more of a link to the Alaskian Independence Party, if you're trying to find radical connections.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:45:41 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to peebs755
Exactly.
This is the point. He met his dad, once, for about a month, in Hawaii, and was uncomfortable the entire time. And, add to that, that his father converted to Christianity later on in life, and bam, they have, well, nothing at all.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:48:38 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to peebs755
Peebs,
I agree that Obama's link to his father and his father's religious tradition has nothing to do with Obama who is a Christian.
I am simply saying that some on the right only use Obama's middle name so as to drive those on the left over the edge.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:45:32 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 4:56:31 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by magnolialover in reply to achrispage6992
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:10:10 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to achrispage6992
Achris,
When I hear Hussein, I think of Obama.
When I hear Muhhamad, I think of Ali.
When I hear Saddam, I think of... Saddam. :-)
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 5:42:34 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 6:18:37 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to open_mind
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 10:26:39 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican
Hahaha. Why am I not surprised you don't get it.
Posted Thursday September 11, 2008 1:07:25 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 11:22:28 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by MoonbatYouBet in reply to anotheramerican
Islam runs in Obama's dad's family and anyone paying attention knows it - anotheramerican
I agree that Obama's link to his father and his father's religious tradition has nothing to do with Obama who is a Christian.- anotheramerican
We already know you don't pay much attention to what other people write, but do you even pay attention to yourself?
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 6:24:25 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anotheramerican in reply to MoonbatYouBet
Occasionally although I am too modest to admit it. :-)
Posted Wednesday September 10, 2008 10:36:14 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by pete592 in reply to anotheramerican
"The pundits I have seen/heard using Obama's middle name sound to me like they are simply tweaking those on the left."
No, that's called ginning up the right.
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:56:10 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wzwriter
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 2:41:56 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wolf kotenberg
Posted Tuesday September 9, 2008 3:15:09 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by IRONY 101
Let me give you an example of how Hannity operates. I just read the article, below, in which Joe Biden says that electing Sarah Palin would be a "backward step for women."
http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2008/09/09/biden-palin-would-be-backward-step-for-women/
Hannity would take a statement such as that and assert that Biden says that electing a woman Vice President would be a "backward step."
That wo