Tue, Sep 9, 2008 12:42pm ET

Send to a friend Print Version

Join the Discussion

Hannity accuses Obama of "outright falsehood" in saying Fox News -- home of the "terrorist fist jab" smear -- has suggested he is Muslim

Summary: On Hannity & Colmes, Alan Colmes stated that "there are those who have said" that Sen. Barack Obama is a Muslim, but "it's not a Fox thing." On his radio show, Sean Hannity also said that "[n]o one has ever suggested that" Obama is a Muslim. In fact, Fox News hosts -- one of whom asked if an affectionate gesture by the Obamas was "a terrorist fist jab" -- have repeatedly promoted false reports about Obama's religion, including the false report that Obama was educated in a madrassa.
Read more

Please upgrade your flash player! The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

Embed this video:

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QuickTime

Threaded Comments: on / off

Post a new comment

You must be a registered user to post and flag comments on this site.
Please log in or sign up to post in this forum.

Posted by magnolialover

Does Hannity realize that there are these things called video recorders. When he, or someone on his station says things like this, they are recorded, and can be reviewed, you know, later, to prove him a fool once more. Jeesh... This is another Hannity challenge, like he seems to do every week, saying, "So and so said that I called him anti American because he's not with the President. I never said that, and can't remember any republican calling someone terrorist sympathizers and anti american just because they didn't agree with the president..." and of the of course, roll about 10 pages of quotes from republicans saying exactly that.

Hannity, out to lunch, permanently. Is it possible for one man to be so stupid?

Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to magnolialover

Amazingly, it doesn't matter that recordings exist because Hannity and FOX simply pretend they don't exist. Try to argue with a FOX viewer about a matter of historical record sometime...

Posted by magnolialover in reply to IRONY 101

True statement. I am constantly amazed, on a daily basis, by the things that they either get completely wrong, or just misinform the public on. Good thing that everyone in the Bush administration ONLY watches FoxNews, instead of, you know, watching the real news out there. No wonder they all think that they're doing a great job, and that Bush will be vindicated by "history". That is, as long as nobody actually looks back to see what really happened when he lead us down the path to ruin.

Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to magnolialover

Just the routine stuff FOX gets wrong amazes me...and they never go back and correct themselves. My brother still insists that China is drilling for oil off the coast of Florida...

Posted by nerzog in reply to magnolialover

Is it possible for 50 million people to be so stupid? Apparently..... yes.

Posted by wzwriter in reply to nerzog

Is it possible for 50 million people to be so stupid? Apparently..... yes.

That's why Adam Sandler movies are so popular......

Posted by neon desert in reply to wzwriter

That's why there are instructions on shampoo bottles.

Posted by worrierking in reply to neon desert

I have new windows and they actually come with a sticker that warns about the dangers of falling from open windows.

I figure if you're old enough to read the warning, you're already aware of the danger.

And if your old enough to read and you still don't know how dangerous falling from an open window is, maybe the gene pool would be better off without you.

Posted by Missouri Democrat in reply to worrierking

WZ or WK it's the same as on elevators there is a little sign that says "exit after doors open". Well duh like I'm going to try to walk off the elevator when the doors are closed. Trust me there are some really rock stupid people out there. Why else would we have been stuck with Bush for 8 years?

Posted by mrhebert74 in reply to magnolialover

Hannity's not stupid, he knows most of America will never see MMFA's debunking of him. In his mind, the fact that Fox News anchors never said "Barack Obama is a Muslim" is likely justification enough for what he said. Although it's obvious that Fox News has lead the way in making that insinuation, it hardly matters to Hannity (or, I'd wager, 99% of his audience).

Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to mrhebert74

That's the point... How would a FOX viewer know he's being lied to if his sole source of information is FOX? Good luck trying to explain that simple concept to a FOX viewer. At the risk of hyperbole I can think of no better word than brainwashing to describe it.

Posted by Kyle_Broflovski in reply to IRONY 101

Your basic premise is flawed, however.  You assume that an average FOX News viewer wants to know that they are being lied to.

Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to Kyle_Broflovski

You are correct. FOX viewers are comfortably secure that all their beliefs fit into one neat package and are constantly reinforced by FOX every day. Ignorance is bliss...

Posted by pithaughn in reply to IRONY 101

"their beliefs" hmmm, I would posit that even what beliefs to have is being spoon fed to them. Why are issues like gay rights and abortion so huge and divisive, when the numbers are so small and pale in comparison to issues like oh say, the US taxpayer taking on an ADDITIONAL $6 trillion in debt?

Posted by NiceguyEddie in reply to IRONY 101

No hyperbole at all.  It's brainwashing.  It becomes a religion to these fools.  It's ABSOLUTLEY brianwashing.  Orwell & Big Brother would be proud.

Posted by wzwriter in reply to magnolialover

It's time for everyone to go through their video recordings, and put the stuff that shows Hannity for the liar he is out on YouTube.

Posted by shaggles

Hannity is a joke.

Posted by DAWUSS

People talk about Obama's "Muslim faith", especially once they make the assertion that Obama is a Muslim. And even if were, WTH is wrong with THAT? There is a difference between being a Muslim and being a Muslim Terrorist.

 

Of course, that line gets blurred or distinguished when it benefits either side.

Posted by neon desert

So easily confused because Obama neglected to add air quotes when he said "my Muslim faith"...

Is there already an adjective "hannity"?  Because there apparently is a need for a word that "dumb" just can't fill.

"My dog is so hannity that he chases parked cars."

"I'm sorry, but there's nothing we can do.  Your son is just hannity."

I had some others, but they all sounded kind of hannity...

Posted by worrierking in reply to neon desert

A better example would be "No dog is that Hannity".

Posted by neon desert in reply to worrierking

True.  I was only trying to insult my dog, not be cruel to him.

Unfortunately, that was a really hannity statement, and I apologize.

Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to worrierking

Better yet...  "Don't step in that dog hannity."  ;>)

Posted by neon desert in reply to IRONY 101

The word "hannity" is an adjective, and should be used thusly:

"The truthiness of Dick Morris is so hannity that it mootifies Fox News as a credible source."

Posted by wzwriter in reply to neon desert

The word "hannity" is an adjective, and should be used thusly:

"The truthiness of Dick Morris is so hannity that it mootifies Fox News as a credible source."

Sean Insanity has been trying to use his name as a verb.  I think the verb form should be used as follows:

"Once the brain scan showed the patient had no brain activity, the doctor said that the patient had been hannitized.

Posted by mary59 in reply to wzwriter

They took him off life support because his brain had hannitized.

Posted by wzwriter in reply to IRONY 101

Better yet...  "Don't step in that dog hannity."  ;>)

I'll be right back - I have to go to the bathroom and take a hannity.

Posted by neon desert in reply to wzwriter

I hope you mean that you plan to "leave" a hannity....

Posted by jumboburrito

Colmes is such an ass kisser.

Posted by watershed

He doesn't remember Steve "This. is. HUGE!" Doocy?

Posted by peace4all

They probably think their correct in saying no one at fox ever said he was muslim. after all, fox never say anything it's either "some people say" or souces say" or my favorite, the cavuto "is barak HUSSIEN obama a muslim?"  fox motto: plausable deniability.

Posted by shaggles

This is how the right works.  It's likely that you won't find a FOX News reporter or a prominent Republican saying this exact sentence: "Barack Obama is a Muslim." The "terrorist fist jab", "he was educated in a madrassa(?)", etc. won't be enough for them.  They will continue to say "No one ever said Barack Obama is a Muslim."

Posted by snoopy

OT, but gee, McCain's daughter Meg, the daughter of the famous P.O.W. John "P.O.W." McCain, says only her family can understand what war is about. Period! (from thinkprogress if the link isn't working)

Meghan McCain: ‘No one knows what war is like other than my family. Period.’»

In an interview on the Today Show this morning, host Meredith Vieira asked Meghan McCain about Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) comments that Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) “doesn’t get it.” Meghan responded by pointing to her dad’s service in Vietnam and her two brothers who are currently enlisted. She then went a step further, however, saying that her family is the only family that understands war:

Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to snoopy

And on top of that you have Caribou Barbie saying that Bush's Iraq war is God's plan. Looks like the Republicans have the whole war thing covered... I wonder what they would do if we weren't at war...would create kind of a vacuum, don't you think?

Posted by DAWUSS in reply to snoopy

What would Johnnie Mac do if his two sons were captured by OPFOR and they became POWs? Would he demand their immediate release or would he have them sit out the duration?

Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to DAWUSS

McCain would start planning to run the kid for public office...

Posted by magnolialover in reply to snoopy

How. Elitist of her to say something like that. The people who serve in our military and have seen combat know all about war. Pain. And suffering. Seriously. She thinks that they're the only ones affected by this? I would bet a lot of money that McCain's sons serve in cushy positions. Mostly due to who their Dad is, and what he's running for now. Talk about a terrorist propaganda bonanza if one of them, or both of them were killed in a combat zone.

Posted by darkmass in reply to magnolialover

"Talk about a terrorist propaganda bonanza if one of them, or both of them were killed in a combat zone." - Magnolialover

Unfortunately, that's kind of a naive perspective.  What it would really do (terrorist propaganda point or not) is freakin guarantee a McCain/Palin win.  You have to keep in mind how the mind of the general public operates.

Oh and by the way, my money's on al-Quada flat praying for a McCain presidency.

Posted by National_Insecurity in reply to darkmass

I'm sure Ayman al Zawahiri has already written the script and shot the video for October release. Have you notice the quality of al Qaeda videos are better these days?  I'm certain they aren't living in caves, but have a nice compound with electricity, sat TV reception, good water, nice food, and apparently Arabian horses according to Dexter Filkins.

Has it been verified that "Afghanistan" was never uttered from the podium at the RNC in St. Paul?  I literally can't fathom the insanity...or the hannity of it all.

I would like to propose a really stupid, just beyond absurd statement, should be a "hannity."   As in, "I can't fathom the hannity of it."

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to snoopy

Snoop,

I watched that interview this morning and came away with the young McCain saying that nobody knows more about war than her family in the same vein that nobody knows more about being an African American than an African American. She even said she was biased (about her family and father) so it was not meant to be elitist or derogatory as you seem to imply.

Posted by beinemac in reply to anotheramerican

That is probably what she wanted to say, but what she ACTUALLY said was,

"No one knows what war is like other than my family. Period."

 

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to beinemac

Read or watch the whole interview. You'll see that your cropped quote is misleading as to her intent.

Posted by loonz in reply to anotheramerican

Her answer didn't fit the question and she made an ass out of herself with that comment.

Posted by anotheramerican

Islam runs in Obama's dad's family and anyone paying attention knows it just as they knows Obama is a Christian and his former pastor is Reverend Wright. Some bomb throwers on the right like to taunt those on the left by using Obama's middle name. (It works every time.)

If McCain's middle name were Adolph, you can bet the left would be all over it. 

This is one of those mindless off-topic subjects that take up time and space in the media and give people something to argue about. 

Posted by wzwriter in reply to anotheramerican

If McCain's middle name were Adolph, you can bet the left would be all over it. 

It's enough for many of is on the left to know that George W. Bush's grandfather helped bankroll the Third Reich.

Posted by RoberttheP in reply to wzwriter

And Joseph Kennedy was a Nazi appeaser. What is your point ?

Posted by wzwriter in reply to RoberttheP

There's a difference between appeasing and bankrolling.  As far as I'm concerned, Bush's grandfather was a traitor.

Posted by RoberttheP in reply to wzwriter

That may be the case but most people could care less, it was 60 plus years ago and Bushs father was a war hero who was shot down in the pacific, just like Kennedys son was a war hero . Obviously you are trying to stir the partisan pot. Grow up and move on.

Posted by magnolialover in reply to RoberttheP

So, I guess then that you don't care that William Ayers did some things about 40 years ago right? Because, that's the brush that righties are always trying to paint Obama with.

Posted by watershed in reply to magnolialover

Pwned!!!111!

Posted by RoberttheP in reply to magnolialover

I absoultely could care less about William Ayers or what he did, he is not running for President, Senator Obama is. For that matter I dont care about the Rev Wright either. And I believe most Americans feel the same, which is why this good man won his partys nomination.

Posted by magnolialover in reply to RoberttheP

Glad to hear you say that. Because everyone else on the right has made a big deal about Wright, Ayers, and other people loosely associated with Obama. One of our very own, AnotherAmerican, likes to tell folks on here how tight Obama and Ayers are, which is super incorrect.

Posted by RoberttheP in reply to magnolialover

Well i am not on the right. I am independent and think for myself.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to magnolialover

Mags,

I simply point out the facts. If McCain had started his political career in David Duke's house, you'd be a little suspicious about him too.

Or, since Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist bomber and so is bin Laden, lets say Obama started out his career in bin Laden's cave 12 years ago?  What would you think then? Both Ayers and bin Laden are terrorist bombers are they not? Both are unrepentant are they not? Both wish they could have done more, do they not? 

Go ahead and keep bringing it up. This association should have disqualified Obama from serious consideration for the Office of the Presidency a long time ago. Obama is the one who willingly associated with an unrepentant Anti-American terrorist bomber and saw nothing wrong with it. I question Obama's world view and have serious reservations about how he would handle the leaders in Iran, North Korea, and Russia. His talk simply does not match his walk.

Posted by loonz in reply to anotheramerican

Both Ayers and bin Laden are terrorist bombers are they not?

I keep on asking you this and you won't reply:  What did Ayers bomb?

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to loonz

Loonz,

I didn't know you asked that. Do you not keep up? He and his Weathermen Underground exploded terrorist bombs at the United States Capital building, The NYC Police Headquarters and other places.

Take a look at this excerpt from Wikopedia:

In a bombing that took place on February 16, 1970, and that was credited to the Weathermen at the time,[26][27] a pipe bomb filled with heavy metal staples and lead bullet projectiles was set off on the ledge of a window at the Park Station of the San Francisco Police Department. In the blast, Brian V. McDonnell, a police sergeant, was fatally wounded while Robert Fogarty, another police officer, received severe wounds to his face and legs and was partially blinded.[28]

Weatherman leader Bernardine Dohrn has been suspected of involvement in the February 16, 1970, bombing of the Park Police Station in San Francisco. At the time, Dohrn was said to be living with a Weatherman cell in a houseboat in Sausalito, California, unnamed law enforcement sources later told KRON-TV.[29] An investigation into the case was reopened in 1999,[30] and a San Francisco grand jury looked into the incident, but no indictments followed,[29] and no one was ever arrested for the bombing.[30] An FBI informant, Larry Grathwohl, who successfully penetrated the organization from the late summer of 1969 until April 1970, later testified to a U.S. Senate subcommittee that Bill Ayers, then a high-ranking member of the organization and a member of its Central Committee (but not then Dohrn's husband), had said Dohrn constructed and planted the bomb. Grathwohl testified that Ayers had told him specifically where the bomb was placed (on a window ledge) and what kind of shrapnel was put in it. Grathwohl said Ayers was emphatic, leading Grathwohl to believe Ayers either was present at some point during the operation or had heard about it from someone who was there.[31] In a book about his experiences published in 1976, Grathwohl wrote that Ayers, who had recently attended a meeting of the group's Central Committee, said Dohrn had planned the operation, made the bomb and placed it herself.[32] In 2008, author David Freddoso commented that "Ayers and Dohrn escaped prosecution only because of government misconduct in collecting evidence against them".[31][33]

[edit] Initial New York City Bombings

Early on the morning of February 21, 1970 as his family slept, three gasoline-filled firebombs exploded at at home of New York State Supreme Court Justice Murtagh at the northern tip of Manhattan. The same night, bombs were thrown at a police car in Manhattan and two military recruiting stations in Brooklyn.

Judge Murtagh was presiding over the trial of the so-called “Panther 21,” members of the Black Panther Party indicted in a plot to bomb New York landmarks and department stores. The side-walk in front of his home had three sentences of blood-red graffiti: "FREE THE PANTHER 21; THE VIET CONG HAVE WON; KILL THE PIGS."

Only a few weeks after the attack, the New York contingent of the Weathermen blew themselves up making more bombs in a Greenwich Village townhouse (see below). The same cell had bombed Judge Murtagh's house, according to Ron Jacobs in The Way the Wind Blew: A History of the Weather Underground. In late November of 1970, a letter to the Associated Press signed by Bernardine Dohrn, now Bill Ayers's wife, promised more bombings.[34]

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to anotheramerican

Sorry for the small print.

Take a look at Wikopedia - Search for Anti Personel bomb set on window ledge in San Francisco where a policeman was killed and another seriously injured.

Informants link that to Dorhn and Ayers. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weatherman_(organization)#Anti-personnel_bomb_set_on_window-ledge_in_San_Francisco

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to anotheramerican

Again my apologies. I am cutting and pasting these links into notepad before pasting them into MMFA but for some reason they are shrinking in font.

You'll have to go look it up yourself if you want to see more.

Posted by neon desert in reply to anotheramerican

Oh yeah?  Well check this out:

.............................................................................................................................................................

Posted by neon desert in reply to neon desert

Shoot.  The font pasted much smaller than it appeared when I copied it.

Oh well, it basically proved that Bill Ayers dove into the frigid waters of the Colorado river in January to save a tightly tied burlap bag stuffed with puppies which McCain had stolen from some disabled orphans in Tuscon and tried to dispose of.

You'll have to look it up and research it yourself...

Posted by foghornleghorn in reply to neon desert

stuffed with puppies

I thought the bag was filled with embryos.

Posted by neon desert in reply to foghornleghorn

You're just being ridiculous.

What would disabled orphans in Tuscon be doing with a bag of embryos?  Sheesh...

Posted by loonz in reply to anotheramerican

You keep on calling him a terrorist bomber and he didn't plant or detonate any bombs or commit any terrorist acts.  If he was a terrorist bomber, he would have gone to prison.

Posted by ex-punk in reply to loonz

Ayers turned himself in and all charges were dropped.  The only people that were hurt were fellow Weathermen.  He must have been somewhat repentant if he turned himself in.   He went to work with a prestigious conservative organization at Chicago Circle Campus, home of Milton Friedman and the Manhattan project.  

Posted by MissDee in reply to loonz

"If he was a terrorist bomber, he would have gone to prison."

In the cell right next to Bin Laden's??

 

Posted by Col. Harlan Sanders in reply to MissDee

Oh, MissDeeranged, what is it about you and failure?

Are you implying that the Bush administration is just too incompetent to apprehend Ayers? He lives right in the area with a full time job and a permanent address. No wonder they failed to get Bin Laden.

LOL!  ;0)  LOL  ;0)

Posted by loonz in reply to anotheramerican

I've been looking over different articles and it appears that even though Ayers' participation in the bombings is unknowable (the informant's info could be true or false; Ayers can't tell the difference between fact and fiction; and I'm still looking for information to back up Freddoso claim), he certainly wasn't against bombing vacant buildings.

Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican

What is the extent of the relationship between Obama and Ayers AA? For you to continue to make this ridiculous contraposition about this relationship you must show it to be extensive. You can't do that and you know it. So stop being disingenious about this and admit you are trying to create something out of nothing. Only God can do that, right?

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to achrispage6992

Arch,

It is not me who is making something out of nothing. It is a fact that Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-American terrorist. 

I for one, do not want to gamble the office of the Presidency on someone who has such ties. I question Obama's judgment and world view by consciously associating with this ultra radical, anti-American, terrorist bomber and wife who both declared war on the United States and should both be in jail.

Ayers and Dohrn are the antithesis of what democracy is all about. They are the same in spirit and deed as bin Laden.

Posted by magnolialover in reply to achrispage6992

Exactly my point. Ayers once contributed $200 to OBama's first campaign. He served on the same board as Ayers. And that's it. They're not friends. Ayers did not have a campaign event at his house for Obama.

"Both Obama and Ayers were members of the board of an anti-poverty group, the Woods Fund of Chicago, between 1999 and 2002. In addition, Ayers contributed $200 to Obama's re-election fund to the Illinois State Senate in April 2001, as reported here. They lived within a few blocks of each other in the trendy Hyde Park section of Chicago, and moved in the same liberal-progressive circles."

From: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/02/obamas_weatherman_connection.html

You keep repeating these things AA, as if they were truth, they are not. Your analogy of Ayers, Duke, Bin Laden, and Obama are weak at best. George W. Bush is good friends with the royal family of Saudi Arabia, Saudi Arabian citizens provide the bulk of funding for terrorist activities around the world, so that must mean that Bush is a terrorist? See how that works? It doesn't. Which is the same for Obama's ties to Ayers. Given that, when Ayers and his group were active, Obama was 8 years old as well, and didn't help out with those activities.

Posted by magnolialover in reply to anotheramerican

NO HE DOESN'T.

Ayers, contributed $200 to Obama's early campaign. That's it. They were the members of the same board. They are not friends. They never hung around with each, and weren't close. They lived in the same neighborhood. That's it. He only had brief contact with Ayers, and probably couldn't pick him out of a police line up if asked.

Stop making things up.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to magnolialover

Mags,

I did not say Obama bombed anyone. I question his judgment and world view for associating with a radical leftist terrorist bomber even 25 years after the fact.

I only took a quick perusal of your note so maybe I missed it. Correct me if I am wrong, but I didn't see any reference to Obama starting his political career in Ayers and Dorhn's living room. 

I'll go look again.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to magnolialover

“I can remember being one of a small group of people who came to Bill Ayers’ house to learn that Alice Palmer was stepping down from the senate and running for Congress,” said Dr. Quentin Young, a prominent Chicago physician and advocate for single-payer health care, of the informal gathering at the home of Ayers and his wife, Dohrn. “[Palmer] identified [Obama] as her successor.”

Obama and Palmer “were both there,” he said.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8630.html

Posted by magnolialover in reply to anotheramerican

That's because he DIDN'T start his political career in his living room.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to anotheramerican

rats..

The link is http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8630.html


Posted by magnolialover in reply to anotheramerican

Both there, but you are claiming this is where Obama launched his political career. Not true. He had already "launched" it before going to Ayers' house to talk to some potential supporters.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to magnolialover

hahahaha... Gotta love your spirit!

Posted by open_mind in reply to magnolialover

Exactly.  Obama was introduced to some of the politcally active people in the neighborhood by the state senator he was going to replace.  In AA's world that is an endorsement of domestic terrorism. 

The politico article even mentions (towards the end I believe) that there is no indication that Obama and Ayers weren't just existing in overlapping circles of Chicago politics at the time.  AA is apparently delusional and has less than nothing here as has been shown repeatedly.

Posted by foghornleghorn in reply to magnolialover

George W. Bush is good friends with the royal family of Saudi Arabia

Exactly.  And Bush was in business with BIN LADEN'S BROTHER!

A little too cozy, if you ask me.  But to AA, that's unimportant.  What's really important is a $200 campaign contribution, not the deaths of 3,000 people and our president's connection (albeit loose) to it.  Coincidence?

 

Posted by magnolialover in reply to anotheramerican

What about the head of the secessionist group that Palin spoke in front of last year? I heard some quotes from him on the radio yesterday that were straight up anti American, as in, "I hate the US, and everything that it stands for.." Seems fairly anti American to me.

Ayers was NOT anti American either. He was anti Vietnam war. Do I condone the methods he and his buddies used? Absolutely not. Is he anti American? Absolutely not.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to magnolialover

Mags,

Got any links? I am waiting to see if it is true. 

Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican

It is a fact that Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-American terrorist

You keep saying that like you believe if you say it so many times it will become the truth. Again, what is the extent of their relationship? Are they buddies? Do they talk often? Is there any evidence which indicates Obama is in agreement with the political philosphy or actions of Ayers? All you got is a one time visit to Ayers home to attend a fundraiser years ago and that the two served ona board with 28 other people together. Is that your proof that "Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-american terrorist?" Is that really all you got? If so you should be ashamed of yourself. Ashamed.

Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican

"They are the same in spirit and deed as bin Laden."--AA

Hahaha! That has got to be the hyperbole of the day.  Ayers destroyed empty rest rooms.  Rush Limbaugh has done more damage after eating a burrito than Ayers ever did.  I doubt you would say the same about him.

Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican

It is a fact that Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-American terrorist

You keep saying that like you believe if you say it so many times it will become the truth. Again, what is the extent of their relationship? Are they buddies? Do they talk often? Is there any evidence which indicates Obama is in agreement with the political philosphy or actions of Ayers? All you got is a one time visit to Ayers home to attend a fundraiser years ago and that the two served ona board with 28 other people together. Is that your proof that "Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-american terrorist?" Is that really all you got? If so you should be ashamed of yourself. Ashamed.

Posted by friedbergboy1422 in reply to anotheramerican

And McCain calls G. Gordon Liddy a friend.  Remember when Liddy urged the Branch Davidians to shoot the ATF in the head?

Why is McCain friends with someone who advocates the murder of federal agents, AA?

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to open_mind

Open,

There is credible evidence that Ayers and Dohrn killed a policeman in San Francisco.  There are other bombings too.  

Ayers fiance at the time blew herself up making a bomb to be set off at an Army dance.

I am amazed that those on the left here will defend a terrorist bomber and make light of his anti-American, criminal, and terrorist behavior. 

Kool aid anyone?

Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican

It is a fact that Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-American terrorist

You keep saying that like you believe if you say it so many times it will become the truth. Again, what is the extent of their relationship? Are they buddies? Do they talk often? Is there any evidence which indicates Obama is in agreement with the political philosphy or actions of Ayers? All you got is a one time visit to Ayers home to attend a fundraiser years ago and that the two served ona board with 28 other people together. Is that your proof that "Obama has more than a passing relationship with an anti-american terrorist?" Is that really all you got? If so you should be ashamed of yourself. Ashamed.

Posted by mescal in reply to anotheramerican

Not after you got your mouth all over the glass.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to achrispage6992

Achris,

It is Ayers who should be ashamed but is not. 

It is Obama who's judgment is so lacking that he associated with a known terrorist that may not be shameful but it sure is questionable. 

I know it is inconvenient to be reminded of these facts. After all, who wants to have it known their candidate associated freely with anti-American terrorist bombers? 

Obviously there are a lot of you. :-) 

Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican

This is what makes me have pretty negative view of partisans.  Thanks for reminding me why I am not one.

Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican

It is Obama who's judgment is so lacking that he associated with a known terrorist that may not be shameful but it sure is questionable

Again AA, what is the esxtent of this "association" you continue to preach about? Does it go beyond a one time attendance at Ayers house and serving on a board with 28 other people? Are you really using those two examples to make the assertion that Obama "associates" with known terrorist?

I know it is inconvenient to be reminded of these facts. After all, who wants to have it known their candidate associated freely with anti-American terrorist bombers? 

Throughout this thread I have asked you what are these "facts" you keep referring to which prove this relationship is anything more than what I and the others here are pointing out? Just answer the damned question! 

Obviously there are a lot of you. :-)

That smiley face means nothing to me. How dare you even insinuate that I would be happy with a candidate who has some kind of secretive approving relationship with a terrorist. Aren't you the one who gave some kind of simpleton excuse on why you didn't serve your country? You sir, have essentially questioned my patriotism, patriotism of which I have more in my little finger than you do in your entire cowardly body.


Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican

"There is credible evidence that Ayers and Dohrn killed a policeman in San Francisco.  There are other bombings too."--AA

Good.  Where is/are the indictment(s) then?  BTW, you need to wipe off your grape mustache.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to open_mind

Open,

The absence of an indictment does not mean there is no reason for suspicion. Were it not for the FBI messing up, both Ayers and Dohrn would most likelybe in jail or at least have served. You forget that Ayers and Dohrn were fugitives for years. Other members of their group went off and did kill others. Ayers fiance at the time was killed making a bomb to blow up at a dance.  

It may be that Obama's repeated connections to Ayers and Dohrn are innocent. But it doesn't resolve the fact that Obama and Ayers hung out in the same groups and shared the same political and social views. 

If you think all that is oaky, it is fine with me. However there are enough connections to Ayers, Dohrn, Wright, and Pflager, plus his community organizer days using following the teachings of Alinsky, (who by the way, dedicated one of his books to the devil,)  to tell me Obama is a radical leftist. Like a leapord cannot change it's spots, Obama cannot change his past.  I personally do not want someone who associated with such a group of anti-American's like this as our President.  

ps. Off subject, I hear Wright has now been named in wrongful termination lawsuit as having an affair with a plaintiff in Texas. *sigh* 

Posted by Col. Harlan Sanders in reply to anotheramerican

Barney, if there was a point, or anything of substance in that post, it was completely smothered by your hysterical repetition, unsupported smears and trivia.

You may have just finally figured out that you're too far gone to ever have any credibility here, and have decided to throw as much BS against the wall as you can. That's fine, you've got nothing to lose, but I'm wondering why you continue to post here when you've obviously given up.

 I hope you don't think you're going to persuade those who are more rational and well-informed than you. If you're just venting for therapeutic reasons, why don't you do it at FreeReepublc or another wingnut site? You'll get positive reinforcement instead of the ridicule you get here, and you won't be taking up thread space and wasting the time of those who are really interested in the topics.

No charge for the advice, and I don't expect a response.

Posted by armadillo in reply to Col. Harlan Sanders

Col.: He's not trying to convince you or us of anything. He's trying to convince himself. It's a self-hypnotic mantra. Mr. Retype Someone Else's Talking Points so wants to believe.

Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican

AA,

There is no substance to those "connections" at all.  Your claim that Obama and Ayers "hung out in the same groups and shared the same political and social views." is meaningless without specifics.  Are you claiming they were buddies?  No.  Are you claiming that Obama agrees with bombing the government? No. Is it your position that Ayers cannot have any legitimate views on politics and social views that might be shared by regular people?  I notice you don't mention those shared views for what I believe is a lack of ability on your part and others to even back them up legitimately. 

I think you have been reading too many things uncritically to have any real credibility here.  I write that with all due respect.

I need something substantial to hang my hat on.  What you have written does not even come close to meeting that threshold.

Posted by foghornleghorn in reply to anotheramerican

will defend a terrorist bomber...

No, we dismiss it as irrelevant.  Was he prosecuted?  Imprisoned?  Exiled out of the U.S.? 

You, however, have drank the kool-aid and continue to cling to exagerrations about Ayers as "proof" of Obama's lack of judgement.

Again, why not read about the Bush family's connections with the Bin Ladens and then you might gain a little perspective and leave Ayers to the dustpile of history.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to foghornleghorn

Were the siblings of bin Laden bombers?  If my critique of Obama were  connections to a sister or brother of Ayers, you might have a point. 

Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican

I find it interesting how quickly you become obtuse with regards to the concept of guilt by association.  I think it is an act - or at least I hope it is.

Posted by albertsenj in reply to anotheramerican

You keep repeating yourself as if THAT will make it the truth.

 'there is evidence' isn't proof. 

There is evidence that you have no functional mind of your own, spouting GOP talking points, and pushing your points even after they have been thoroughly discredited here.

Now, if I copy & paste the above sentence - what is the magical number of times? - will you in fact have no functioning mind?

 

 

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to albertsenj

Albert,

 Nice strawman.  I never said it was.

Posted by pearlene_scott1602 in reply to anotheramerican

There is credible evidence that Ayers and Dohrn killed a policeman in San Francisco.  There are other bombings too.  

Jesus Christ AA!

Buy a clue!

If there was CREDIBLE evidence THEY WOULD BE IN JAIL!!!!!!

Posted by mescal in reply to pearlene_scott1602

To be fair, Pearlene, by credible he means he heard it from Rush.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to pearlene_scott1602

Pearlene,

Your argument falls apart with two letters:  O.J.

 

Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican

But your evidence doesn't even reach the level of OJ.  OJ had a trial because an evidentury threshold had been crossed.

A grand jury chose not to indict Ayers in 2002 - a decade after Ayers previous charges were dropped due to prosecutorial misconduct in a different matter.  The grand jury did not think there was enough credible evidence to indict - which was not the case with OJ.

I have to love your attempt at logic here though.  One presumably guilty man goes free - therefore anyone merely accused of a crime, but not found guilty is likely guilty.  Great logic.

Posted by wzwriter in reply to RoberttheP

Grow up and move on.

I'm 55 years old, Bob - I grew up years ago.  And I won't "move on" as long as there are stupid people in the world like you.

Posted by RoberttheP in reply to wzwriter

The only stupid person is you, but whatever. 55 ? Sure and i am 108.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to RoberttheP

Bob,

It does no good to insult people and only diminishes the good points you have made.

Of course people here will disagree with you, especially if you are not a liberal/progressive.

It is the discussion that is fun. The insults are unnecessary. I've been down that road and found it to be a waste of time and energy.

ps. However a good zinger now and then is fun.  :-)

Posted by foghornleghorn in reply to anotheramerican

It is the discussion that is fun

Yeah, it's all fun and games to you - lies, smears, all in the name of a little innocent "fun".  People are dying due to these same sorts of lies and you say that it is fun.

Grow up.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to foghornleghorn

Fog,

I hope you are enjoying your ride on that high horse. :-)  

Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican

"Of course people here will disagree with you, especially if you are not a liberal/progressive."--AA

Project much?  I don't disagree with bob because he is "not a liberal/progressive" I disagree with him because I think he is wrong.  I have no problem agreeing with non liberal/progressives and never have had a problem with it. 

It is enlightening that you think people here are like that though.  Perhaps it says more about the way you think.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to open_mind

You prove my point.

Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican

I am sure somewhere in your mind your post made sense.

Posted by wzwriter in reply to RoberttheP

The only stupid person is you, but whatever. 55 ? Sure and i am 108.

I was born in 1952, and my birthday is in two months.  You do the math, if you can.

Posted by Semiauto in reply to anotheramerican

AA sad: Islam runs in Obama's dad's family

Runs in the family? Is that like blond hair or cute dimples? Also you are missing the point that they are not trying to link him to Muslims, but to the muslims we are fighting around the world. That is the subtle association they are trying to make.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to Semiauto

I disagree. The pundits I have seen/heard using Obama's middle name sound to me like they are simply tweaking those on the left.

Those who would not vote for Obama because of his name or father's family religious heritage would not have voted for him anyway.

Posted by peebs755 in reply to anotheramerican

Obama met his Father once, for a month long visit. His Father's religion had nothing to do with Obama's life. The right IS trying to link him to Muslim extremists. If they weren't, why bring it up repeatedly? Ms. Palin has more of a link to the Alaskian Independence Party, if you're trying to find radical connections.

Posted by magnolialover in reply to peebs755

Exactly.

This is the point. He met his dad, once, for about a month, in Hawaii, and was uncomfortable the entire time. And, add to that, that his father converted to Christianity later on in life, and bam, they have, well, nothing at all.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to peebs755

Peebs,

I agree that Obama's link to his father and his father's religious tradition has nothing to do with Obama who is a Christian.

I am simply saying that some on the right only use Obama's middle name so as to drive those on the left over the edge.  

Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican

No they use it to try to create the appearance of a valid comparison between Obama and radical terrorists like Saddam HUSSEIN. It's simple really AA when you hear the word HUSSEIN what is the first thing you think about? Come on!

Posted by magnolialover in reply to achrispage6992

Except, Hussein wasn't a terrorist. He was a dictator. There is a difference.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to achrispage6992

Achris,

When I hear Hussein, I think of Obama. 

When I hear Muhhamad, I think of Ali. 

When I hear Saddam, I think of... Saddam. :-)

Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican

So you admit when you hear "Saddam Hussein", you think of "Saddam" and then "Obama"?  I think you just proved Chris' point for him.

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to open_mind

???? 

Posted by open_mind in reply to anotheramerican

Hahaha. Why am I not surprised you don't get it.

Posted by achrispage6992 in reply to anotheramerican

Fine, then I want you to try a little experiment. Pick ten people at random and ask them to tell you what visual comes to their mind when they hear the word Hussein. If the first thing that comes to your mind is Obama then you sir, are nothing but brainwashed and give credence to my point.

Posted by MoonbatYouBet in reply to anotheramerican

Islam runs in Obama's dad's family and anyone paying attention knows it - anotheramerican  

I agree that Obama's link to his father and his father's religious tradition has nothing to do with Obama who is a Christian.- anotheramerican

We already know you don't pay much attention to what other people write, but do you even pay attention to yourself? 

Posted by anotheramerican in reply to MoonbatYouBet

Occasionally although I am too modest to admit it. :-)

Posted by pete592 in reply to anotheramerican

"The pundits I have seen/heard using Obama's middle name sound to me like they are simply tweaking those on the left."

No, that's called ginning up the right.  

Posted by wzwriter

In Pinhead Hannity's world, anyone who agrees with him is a "Great American".  Anyone who DOESN'T agree with him is a communist, a socialist, a terrorist, a jihadist, etc, etc, etc......

Posted by wolf kotenberg

Obama is no muslim. Just look at his all american family and how they conduct themselves in this society. the fist-jab this was covered ad-infinitum here at MMFA. It uisn't news and for Hannity to portray it as such does real news service a disservice. I'd rather hear how exactly Mccain is going to "reform" things here in the US. Put lipstick on a pig ? he already put lipstick on a pit bull.

Posted by IRONY 101

Let me give you an example of how Hannity operates. I just read the article, below, in which Joe Biden says that electing Sarah Palin would be a "backward step for women."

http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2008/09/09/biden-palin-would-be-backward-step-for-women/

Hannity would take a statement such as that and assert that Biden says that electing a woman Vice President would be a "backward step."

That wo