Fri, Sep 5, 2008 5:36pm ET

Send to a friend Print Version

Join the Discussion

Tribune's Silva repeated Palin claim that "Obama-Biden" Dems have attacked her family -- but didn't note complete lack of evidence

Summary: The Chicago Tribune's Mark Silva repeated Gov. Sarah Palin's claim that "the Obama-Biden Democrats have been vicious in their attacks directed toward ... my family," but gave no indication that he had challenged Republican aides to substantiate Palin's charge with examples of purported attacks. By contrast, while reporting the charge, NBC, ABC, and the AP all reported that when asked to provide examples of such attacks, Palin aides, the McCain campaign, and the RNC did not provide any.
Read more

Threaded Comments: on / off

Post a new comment

You must be a registered user to post and flag comments on this site.
Please log in or sign up to post in this forum.

Posted by shaggles

"The misinformation and flat-out lies must be corrected."

 I agree, Sarah.  When are you going to correct them?

Posted by DAWUSS in reply to shaggles

I don't think she will, not with her biggest admirers like Jeff Christie covering up her separatist affiliations by bringing up the Obama children and Jeremiah Wright.

Posted by nerzog in reply to DAWUSS

If Wright is fair game, then I think we should look into Caribou Barbie's nutjob church. Maybe there's a video of her speaking in tongues out there.... wouldn't that be SPECIAL!

Posted by DAWUSS in reply to nerzog

Not to mention that someone needs to see if she's friends with unrepentant terrorists who don't regret setting bombs

Posted by nerzog in reply to DAWUSS

Well, her husband belongs to an organization that wants Alaska to secede from the Union. I think that trumps a peripheral acquaintance with a dried up old hippie radical (who apparently isn't very dangerous, since the Patriot Act Stormtroopers haven't arrested him)

Posted by worrierking in reply to nerzog

Here's a link to a story about her "faith" from NPR.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=94332540

Posted by Graydogs

I'm not sure Palin can say the media doesn't have any evidence on this story. I just saw it on CNN with Cambell Brown. The article below confirmed what Cambel Brown reported, that Palin and McCain both told the story to make it sound folksy, and at a profit to the state.

 

Story that Sarah Palin sold Alaska state jet on eBay is a campaign-trail tall tale

By CORKY SIEMASZKO
Daily News Staff Writer

Friday, September 5th 2008, 12:05 PM

The folksy tale of how Gov. Sarah Palin saved Alaska millions by unloading the state jet on eBay is fast becoming a campaign fish-that-got-away tale.

Sen. John McCain not only repeated that story on the stump Friday to tout his Republican running mate, but added, "She made a profit, too."

The truth is that Palin couldn't find a buyer last year when she tried to peddle to plane on eBay - and lost the state money when she did sell it.

Palin's predecessor, Frank Murkowski, originally bought the 20-year-old Westwing II for the state of Alaska for $2.7 million. She listed it on eBay for $2.5 million.

When no offers came in, Palin hired a jet broker - Turbo North Aviation in Anchorage - which sold the jet for $2.1 million to an Alaska businessman.

"We handled the sale for the state of Alaska," jet broker Rob Heckmann told the Daily News. "The eBay thing didn't work out for them."

Twenty months ago, when Palin was running for governor, she pounded Murkowski relentlessly about the jet and called it an extravagance, even though he shared it with the state's Public Safety Department.

Heckmann said Palin isn't the first politician who has tried to sell a state plane on eBay.

Posted by Great American

Just watch CNN or MSNBC to see the "Obama-Biden" Dems in action trashing Palin.

Posted by truthseeker77

Go ahead, guys. Let it out of your chests. State the relationship between this MMFA article and the Daily Kos. Don't be afraid.

Posted by Graydogs in reply to truthseeker77

Where did anyone mention the Daily Kos?

Posted by mefirst in reply to truthseeker77

and the point is what exactly?  two sites had the same story?  shall we call the fbi? 

Posted by cpinva

the story about the plane is all over the place, the daily kos hardly had an exclusive on it.

the fact that gov. palin is under investigation, for abuse of office, by her state's legislature, should have been sufficient reason to not pick her as veep. but that assumes the republicans have any sense of ethics.

Posted by mefirst

here's more of that vintage whine about how poor sarah palin's family is being treated.  columnist kathleen parker:  "were it not for the pain of a teenager who didn't deserve to be exposed and exploited..."  

uh, wasn't it palin who took the job?  hasn't she had her family in front of every camera?  did anyone think that no notice would be taken of an obviously pregnant 17 year old?

Posted by nananance

 

 It doesn't take an official spokesperson to spread personal attacks, and ones regarding Palin's personal life are all over sites like Salon and Huffington Post.

I don't recall any official Republican spokesperson spreading the smears about Obama but that didn't make them any less  effective.

Two can play the same game, it's just disingenuous to see the Democratic side claiming it isn't playing politics as usual.

P.S. Washinton Post columnist Sally Quinn said mothers who are in politics can never put their country first, a great way to appeal to the more than 70 percent of women who work outside the home

Posted by pete592 in reply to nananance

"It doesn't take an official spokesperson to spread personal attacks"

But it's OK to accuse an official spokesperson of spreading them without evidence?

"ones regarding Palin's personal life are all over sites like Salon and Huffington Post."

Salon and HuffPost are not the ones being accused of family attacks by Palin. 

"I don't recall any official Republican spokesperson spreading the smears about Obama"

That's funny.  I sure do.

Allow me to refresh your memory.

"Two can play the same game, it's just disingenuous to see the Democratic side claiming it isn't playing politics as usual."

Who exactly is making this claim? 

 

Posted by pete592 in reply to pete592

Here's another one.

Posted by pete592 in reply to pete592

And another.