I can forgive Morris' goofy calculations.  He doesn't even know how many Senators there are.

Once you get past counting the number of toes, he has problems.

Does this mean that McCain is now 90% ties as the most liberal guy in the Senate? LOL.  It is so absurd how these guys want to have it both ways.  Obamas the MOST LIBERAL GUY IN THE SENATE, but he's NO DIFFERENT FROM JOHN McCAIN.  These guy can't even keep track of their own lies.

It's really irrelevant whether McCain voted with Bush or not, from where I sit they both share the same opinions on policy and issues, foreign and domestic....he isn't anti-Bush, despite Morris' twisting and spinning.

That is where people should make up their minds. 

I emailed this tip 6 hours ago.  Where's my credit?  Me! Me! Me!

Sorry, Gov. all of the tipster positions are filled. One of us has to die before you can be appointed.

Back on topic, why does Obama refuse to congratulate the NY Giants? He sure doesn't seem very American.

Senator Obama refuses to congratulate the Super Bowl champions for the same reason many of us won't.

It's because they're  the New Jersey Giants.

We're Americans here in NJ too. 

Nope, it's this

Neal Boortz tried to add in the funny with this:

 

 I'm not quite sure if it succeeds in either category, though.

This cartoon is wrong, too. Grampy record shows he was hardly ever there to vote.

That cartoon is stupid for two reasons: 

1.  It takes an intentionally naive view of lawmaking with the "the president does not vote" line.

2.  It is incredibly disingenuous in that McCain has a worse attendance record than Obama in the Senate.

Worst of all, it's not funny.

That sums up right-wing humor - not factual AND not funny. You can get away with one of them, but not both.

Oh, I don't know. You could take it as Obama telling the truth while mcsame retorts with another lie. But a real fact is mcsame has used both attacks against Obama. mcsame will say anything to get elected.

And he'll most likely have his VP do anything to get him elected

 

It would get the EIB Seal of Approval, that's for sure...

I think it was the Col, but I remember someone here making the same statement! This is too ironic!

Palin: I’d Oppose Abortion Even if My Daughter’s Raped By a Moose

By Don Davis

 

“I WOULD ALSO TAKE THE SAME POSITION WITH A SQUIRREL, BUT IF IT WERE RUSSIAN SPIES, THAT’S WHERE I’D HAVE TO DRAW THE LINE.”

Just more idiotic interpretations of a U.S. Senator's voting record: instead of "ratings" and "rankings", now it's all about "percentages"...

Insult us a little more why don't you.

Every vote cast by every U.S. Senator, is cast on a particular matter or issue: talk about the issues, and not about some stupid "ranking" or any idiotic senseless "percentage"...

Talk about IRAQ.

This f'wit has appeared on a British political show called Newsnight as an expert on the Clinton administration and a democratic strategist!! If l find out he is to appear again l swear l will do my best to be there and ask what reason the BBC have for foisting this lying agenda ridden smear merchant on the public as an expert for anything other than sucking the toes of prostitues.

Aren't pundits and commentators like Morris required to be consistent with their own prior statements and views?

If Morris likes Bush, and he likes McCain, and he dislikes Obama, then he should be proud of the fact that McCain supports Bush, and he should be using Obama's opposition to Bush as an anti-Obama campaign issue.

The fact that even tools like Morris won't defend Bush tells you how unpopular he is.  Is anyone going to hold Morris to his own prior statements?

Well... let's see. McCain voted w/ Bush 90% of the time. If Obama only voted differently to Bush 10% of the time, he would have been drummed out of the Party by now. lol God, that's why they call him DICK Morris. ;-)

Obama most likely would have a record of voting w/ Bush around 60-80% of the time, however he did not vote on most unanimous issues. Take a look at http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/o000167/ and notice how, although he may have voted for something one day, he refused to vote on many other issues which were unanimous votes.

 

I believe this is no accident, and that in order to keep his agreement with Bush % down, he purposely refused to vote on issues in which he would come in agreement with Bush. I find it very insulting to make a claim about how his opponent votes when he himself refuses to vote on issues which will align him w/ the president.

Out of curiosity, does anyone have an idea as to the last time The Dick got a prediction right?

Would someone remind me why anyone should take seriously anything from a man who used to let his paid whores listen in to phone calls he made to the White House?