Join the Discussion
Media continue to repeat plagiarism accusation without noting that Biden had previously credited Kinnock
Summary: Media outlets continue to report that Sen. Joe Biden was accused in 1987 of plagiarizing then-British Labour Party leader Neil Kinnock without noting that while Biden did paraphrase from a Kinnock speech without attribution on at least two occasions in August 1987, he had reportedly credited Kinnock when previously using the same language.
Read more
Threaded Comments: on / off
Posted by mary59
My what a puny story. This shows the trivia that gets blown into a something...meanwhile, what's happening in Afghanistan and Iraq? Gee, the press doesn't know, they closed all their foreign bureaus. How much are these invasions costing the U.S. taxpayer??? H*ll, we don't know, that takes too much time to figure out.
Go get 'em Joe...
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 4:44:45 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by eb in reply to mary59
The other big wingnut issue is Obama's fake birth cirtificate. I heard I guy (cant remember the name) who gets an hour every weekend on the air who is up in arms over this native born citizen issue.
Imagine, we will pick our president based on a 20 year old plagarism charge and a supposed phony birth certificate!
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 4:58:07 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to eb
I heard I guy (cant remember the name) who gets an hour every weekend on the air who is up in arms over this native born citizen issue.
The guy doesn't say anything about McCain being born outside of the U.S.?
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:19:19 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by carlileb5935 in reply to loonz
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 10:25:37 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by mescal in reply to carlileb5935
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 3:03:58 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by juliajayne in reply to mary59
Hey, Mary. It is a puny story. When I saw the news that Obama selected Biden, I knew the hackocracy was going to bring it up though. Makes me glad I'm on vacation (here at an internet cafe while my H prints out some directions for someplace we want to go) and not hearing much.
Just came to see how all you bastards are doin'. :-0) and seeing the new ridiculousness being bandied about our corproate media propoganda outlets. Gee, so sorry to miss it all, not!
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 5:13:45 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by mary59 in reply to juliajayne
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 5:28:01 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by vysotsky in reply to mary59
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:33:42 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to vysotsky
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:40:08 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by vysotsky in reply to Science101
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:44:48 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by mary59 in reply to vysotsky
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:59:31 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Leftwingcenter in reply to vysotsky
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:06:37 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Col. Harlan Sanders in reply to Leftwingcenter
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 3:04:36 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to mary59
This shows the trivia that gets blown into a something...meanwhile, what's happening in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Most of your mainstream media likes to pray on negative articles regarding the war. Fortunately, there isn't much negative going on. In terms of war in the media - no news is good news.
However, the Presidential race, Georgia, the Olympics, and crude oil/gasoline prices just happen to be the biggest things garnering attention. If the news stations decided not to cover these 4 things, their viewier ratings would drop.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 5:13:46 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by laughinglefty in reply to Science101
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 5:36:26 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to laughinglefty
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 5:40:46 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by dbeden4153 in reply to Science101
A war in which we've already won.
It's an occupation now, and you know it.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:12:31 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to dbeden4153
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:36:13 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by dbeden4153 in reply to Science101
"But to be expected in war."
Why then do you call it a war?
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:42:17 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to dbeden4153
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:00:49 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking in reply to Science101
YOU DON"T KNOW A GOD DAMNED THING ABOUT WAR!
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:02:03 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Col. Harlan Sanders in reply to worrierking
Hi King, I don't know a goddamn thing about war either. I do like this little essay, How to Tell a True War Story, by Tim O'Brien (no relation, I swear). If I linked to this before, or if you're familiar with it, never mind. A friend of mine who's a Lit. teacher at the local community college tipped me to the guy, and I really like his stuff.
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 3:11:05 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking in reply to Col. Harlan Sanders
I think this is from "The Things They Carried". A great book of semi-related stories. I've read if and I'm going to reread it soon.
Thanks for the link K.
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 8:44:34 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by dbeden4153 in reply to Science101
My, irrelevant much?
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:19:31 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by carlileb5935 in reply to Science101
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 10:27:55 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Col. Harlan Sanders in reply to carlileb5935
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 3:11:51 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking in reply to Col. Harlan Sanders
Your average commie is very good at concealing his identity. Imagine if they were to become hippies how hard it would be to find them?
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 8:48:35 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to Science101
No one likes casualties, they are a terrible thing. But to be expected in war.
Those eighteen didn't have to die though. The 4100+ didn't have to die. It's a shame that Bush Co. will probably get away with causing all those deaths.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:26:44 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to loonz
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:38:45 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by dbeden4153 in reply to Science101
Did the DOT admin actively seek to distort facts in their favor in a push for...
You know what, I don't think you'll get my analogy
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:45:14 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to Science101
Roughly 119 people die every single day in traffic accidents in the US alone.
What does a war that had no business being waged have to do with traffic accidents?
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:03:19 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by carlileb5935 in reply to loonz
Don't let the facts escape a good story.
Don't let logic ever get in the way of a demonstration of a good, old fashioned wingnut analogy.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 10:31:29 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by anyfreedomleft in reply to carlileb5935
Like you say, it's a wingnut analogy ... in the righties' style, it's something totally irrelevant ... like the "second-hand smoke vs ice cream" "argument" (I don't recall anybody being forced to endure second-hand ice cream ...)
A truer analogy for the dying soldiers would be if the media was covering up 18 POLICE MEN (or women) dying in a month ... if that happened, there would be total 24/7 news coverage about the new holocaust ... because the U.S. troops are acting like the police over there (aside from turning a blind eye to all the bribes for "not killing" the people who differ from you in religion ... which is finished, because pretty much, they've killed all of them ...)
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 4:19:46 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by vysotsky in reply to Science101
You see, I like that line just because it's a bigger number, but you can stick with your joke about traffic fatalities if you want. I mean, bigger numbers tend to provoke bigger laughs, but both statistics are equally irrelevant to the casualty rate among our soldiers who have been ordered into harm's way unnecessarily.
Or maybe it would be funnier if you said: "But Mom, Traffic's parents let him kill 119 people a day! Can't I even kill just 18 people a month? Pleeeeeaaaaase?!?!"
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 12:19:14 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Col. Harlan Sanders in reply to vysotsky
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 3:16:40 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by historygeek001 in reply to Science101
Roughly 119 people die in traffic accidents...
I like apples. This is as relevant as your weird response.
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 11:05:17 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by tbone in reply to Science101
This is your brain. This is your brain after right-wing indoctrination. 18 US fatalities is a "positive".
No one disputes that reduction in levels of violence is a good thing but never forget that these casualties are tragedies, particularly as they are part of the sunken cost fallacy that is Iraq. There was no national security threat worth the invasion and there remains none today. We need to leave as soon as reasonably possible. You want to throw cash at Allawi to prop him up thereafter fine - but get our troops out of harm's way.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:39:37 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to tbone
No one disputes that reduction in levels of violence is a good thing but never forget that these casualties are tragedies
Appears to be just what I was saying. Now, lets see how you can spin it into something different.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:41:08 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by snoopy in reply to Science101
But 18 in a month is more of a "positive" when its regarding war and over 100,000+ troops.
Let's see if I get this right. 18 troops die in a month, so what.
Just one baby is aborted, Science is up in arms.
Just one case of someone cheating welfare surfaces, Science thinks welfare is out of control and needs to be eliminated.
I could go on and on, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that the former histybuff known as science doesn't have a set standard when it comes to articulating his position on anything.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:13:30 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking in reply to snoopy
SSAndswithalotofdigits used to be HissyFit.
We need a program so we can tell of all of the trolls apart.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:18:58 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by snoopy in reply to worrierking
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:26:08 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking in reply to snoopy
I used to be pretty good at detecting these clowns but I got overwhelmed.
Science guy's been around for a lot longer I think. He started posting in sixth grade and I think he's in high school now.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:32:12 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Col. Harlan Sanders in reply to worrierking
They're pretty easy to get confused. I think one of them says he's 28, has done time in the Nat'l Guard and the reserves, has several advanced degrees, has drilled for oil on one of his properties, and has taken some time off to care for an abandoned relative.
Quite a list of accomplishments at that age, impresive for a normal person , almost unbelievable for somebody who seems to be stunted at the mental level of a 10 year old.
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 3:22:05 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by edwilljunior8473 in reply to Science101
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 9:40:32 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by pointofview in reply to mary59
It is not a puny story. The Media will continue to report it because Biden is guilty as charged.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:51:10 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to pointofview
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:01:47 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by mary59 in reply to pointofview
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:02:26 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by pointofview in reply to mary59
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:57:25 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to pointofview
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:05:03 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by snoopy in reply to pointofview
McCain plaigarized Solzenitzn's story about the cross in the sand to lie about his career and y'all could care less, so why are you making a big stink now?
Oh yeah, because Biden is a Democrat. It's part of that two rules policy the elitist republikkkans use to cover their long list of crimes.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:19:16 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by snoopy in reply to mary59
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:00:12 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by TrueDemocrat4377
This seems like a pretty easy Yes or No question.
(by the way, if Biden didn't plagiarize then why did he drop out of the 1988 race?)
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 5:11:44 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by mary59
"June was the deadliest month for U.S. troops in Afghanistan since the war there began in late 2001, as resilient and emboldened insurgents have stepped up attacks in an effort to gain control of the embattled country.
Defense officials and Afghanistan experts said the toll of 28 U.S. combat deaths recorded last month demonstrates a new resurgence of the Taliban, the black-turbaned extremists who were driven from power by U.S. forces almost seven years ago. Taliban units and other insurgent fighters have reconstituted in the country's south and east, aided by easy passage from mountain redoubts in neighboring Pakistan's lawless tribal regions.
Then, it noted,
The nation's top military officer said yesterday that more U.S. troops are needed in Afghanistan to tamp down an increasingly violent insurgency, but that the Pentagon does not have sufficient forces to send because they are committed to the war in Iraq."
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:32:39 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by fantagor
If we are going to replay gaffes of the 1980s then out comes the whole Keating Five scandal. Does McCain really want to open that can of worms?
Randy
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:40:41 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to fantagor
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 6:41:52 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to fantagor
Does McCain really want to open that can of worms?
As a POW, John McCain ate cans of worms...and you were beaten if you plagiarized. And now he's a former POW...but he doesn't like to talk about it.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:13:41 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking in reply to IRONY 101
Because Joe Biden is not a Former POW© and John McCain will always be a Former POW©.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:23:25 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by IRONY 101 in reply to worrierking
Today I heard the former POW, John McCain, say, "My friends, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country, my friends." When accused of plaiarism, the former POW responded that he didn't have a house or a table and chair for a number of years... ;>)
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:31:21 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz
Bush all you want, when in fact the overwhelming majority of all Congress voted to go to war.
They didn't vote for war; they handed their war powers over to Bush and left the decision up to him which was a huge mistake.
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:15:05 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to loonz
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:41:07 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by dbeden4153 in reply to Science101
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 7:49:51 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Easy to refute wingnuts in reply to dbeden4153
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 8:53:31 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to Science101
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 8:33:49 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Science101 in reply to loonz
Posted Sunday August 24, 2008 9:29:16 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to Science101
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 5:08:16 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by interestingobserver
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 3:15:49 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by loonz in reply to interestingobserver
So let me get this straight: the media is wrong for pointing out Biden's plagiarism because it does not also point out instances in which he did not plagiarize.
If he was trying to plagiarize he wouldn't have given credit to the author several other times.
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 5:12:53 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Brabantio in reply to interestingobserver
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 8:37:34 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by interestingobserver
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 3:16:32 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking
Waaaaaa, Joe Biden called me a name.
Waaaaaa, Joe Biden stole my lunch money.
Gramps and his crew need to grow the fu_k up!
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 8:53:28 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Easy to refute wingnuts in reply to worrierking
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 8:55:30 AM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by TrueDemocrat4377
The Write Stuff? Why Biden's plagiarism shouldn't be forgotten.
By David Greenberg
http://www.slate.com/id/2198543/pagenum/2/
Posted Monday August 25, 2008 6:08:14 PM EDT / Flag this comment