Wed, Aug 13, 2008 1:52pm ET

Send to a friend Print Version

Join the Discussion

WSJ omits facts about McCain's voting record, reversal on immigration

Summary: The Wall Street Journal reported that the RNC "made note of Sen. Obama's party-line votes. During the 109th Congress, which was in session in 2005-2006, Sen. Obama voted along party lines 97% of the time. Sen. McCain voted with his party 81% of the time, according to Congressional Quarterly." But in citing only the CQ 2005-2006 "party unity" scores provided by the RNC, the Journal failed to note that according to a 2008 CQ study, McCain voted in support of the Bush administration's position 95 percent of the time in 2007, making McCain the administration's most reliable supporter in the Senate that year.
Read more

Threaded Comments: on / off

Post a new comment

You must be a registered user to post and flag comments on this site.
Please log in or sign up to post in this forum.

Posted by BottleBlonde

They (O'Reilly and others) were making an issue of the Obama ad that quoted his votes from a few years ago where he voted with Bush 90% of the time. Only to find out, the most recent polling of him showed an even greater alliance between McCain and Bush.

The WSJ talking about one metric, one way to measure the candidates, while ignoring other metrics, is conservative misinformation.

Posted by DAWUSS in reply to BottleBlonde

Doesn't that contradict the flip-flopping from Johnnie Mac?

Posted by mary59 in reply to DAWUSS

No.  He's flipped from previous positions to vote WITH Bush and collect the Bush family fund raising machine.

Posted by princeofwheels in reply to mary59

Mary, your answer for the Wuss threw him off his game. Shame on you. He never would have thought of it that way.

We'll find him on the next thread.

Posted by DAWUSS in reply to mary59

Ah OK, got it.

Posted by wolf kotenberg in reply to mary59

flip-flop twice (or any multiple of two) you end up with the original theme. just keep count

Posted by mary59

Figures don't lie, but liars figure.  it figures.

Posted by wolf kotenberg

Amazing how they manipulate the data to hide Mccain's atrocious voting record including he holds a 60% plus  record for absenses. Chute, I can pick out a certain year where i was a really good kid and portray that as my record.

Posted by shoes89

Yet again ... MM takes an article that is very unflattering to Sen. McCain and cherrypicks a fact buried in it.

The casual reader will get the gist of the article, "Republican Trio Crosses Party Lines To Back Obama" and see that this is not good news for the senator.

"Conservative misinformation"? Hardly!

Posted by wzwriter in reply to shoes89

Yet again - Shoes nitpicks a story in a vain attempt to make her side look good, fails miserably, and slithers away.

Why don't you ever respond, Shoes? Are you chicken?

Posted by Governor in reply to shoes89

The WSJ did the cherry-picking, not MM.

 

(off topic alert: another republican wacko has committed a terrorist attack on US soil: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/14/us/14arkansas.html?ref=politics)

Posted by thomp.steve9098 in reply to Governor

Where in your link (or anywhere else) does it state that the gunman was a republican?

Posted by tommy in reply to thomp.steve9098

I am also not privy to that inside information concerning the gunman's political affiliation, like the Governor is, apparently.  Or did he just make that up????

Posted by snoopy in reply to tommy

Well, he didn't make up the shooting, that's for sure. The Dem party chairman, Bill Gwatney died. While it doesn't say why the guy did it you have to wonder why someone would specifically ask for the democratic party chairman and then proceed to kill him in cold blood. I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out this is another right wing nut like the one who recently went on a shooting spree at a church because it had liberal views.

Posted by tommy in reply to snoopy

It could be personal and nothing do with politics, geesh......trying to score a political point off of some tragedy is beneath contempt.

Posted by snoopy in reply to tommy

I'm gonna assume that if it does come out that it was for political reasons that you'll apologize for that remark. ;)

Posted by tommy in reply to snoopy

The political affiliations of some nutcase, who in cold blood guns down somebody, is not a pressing issue for me, sorry.  

Posted by Governor in reply to tommy

I'm not a Dem, so I've no political points to score, but if you can speculate that it was a shooting not based on politics, others can surely, and, in my opinion, be far more close to the truth in assuming it was a political hit. 

Posted by tommy in reply to Governor

You specifically called him a Republican with absolutely no factual basis, and you say you've no political point to score? 

Now that's one for the books, LOL!

Posted by Governor in reply to tommy

I specifically assume he's a Republican.  If I'm wrong, I'll admit it, and if right, I'll drop it.

Posted by tommy in reply to Governor

It's shameless to even assume his political affiliation unless you're out to shamelessly score political points, which you did, and you are.

Shameful. 

Posted by Governor in reply to tommy

And it's pathetic of you to try and score points as you pretend to give a shit.

Posted by Governor in reply to tommy

PS: we will learn that he's a member of the NRA and votes Republican.

Posted by snoopy in reply to Governor

The Associated Press has reported the shooting suspect as 50-year-old Timothy Dale Johnson of Searcy, Arkansas. No motive is known, but it is reported that moments after he fired shots at Gwatney, he told the building manager at the nearby Arkansas Baptist headquarters, "I lost my job."

Posted by Governor in reply to snoopy

SEARCY, Ark. (AP) — The sheriff's office says a search of Arkansas gunman Timothy Dale Johnson's home turned up 14 guns, antidepressants, his last will and testament and a Post-It note that bore his victim's last name and a telephone number.

Posted by Limit Corp. Ownership in reply to shoes89

Shoes,

Media Matters did not cherry pick a "fact."

Media Matters highlighted a piece of conservative misinformation.  That's what Media Matters does.

It appears in this case that the reporters were too lazy to present the true facts, and merely repeated verbatim the sludge they were handed by the RNC stooges.

Posted by shoes89 in reply to Limit Corp. Ownership

"RNC stooges" handed "sludge" to the NY Times for an article entitled "Republican Trio Crosses Party Lines To Back Obama"??

I really, really doubt that.

Posted by Max Dharma

Republican National Committee (RNC) "criticized" Sen. Barack Obama "for, in its view, his lack of bipartisan accomplishments."

 

Say it ain’t so!

 

Hahaha!

Posted by snoopy

Speaking of immigration, did you know that it's the immigrants to America, both legal and illegal, who are responsible for the rising CO2 emissions world wide? I'm shocked, I tell ya!

Posted by snoopy

This is just too good to pass up. McSame's lobbyist, what a guy!

Monday, August 11, 2008

POWER HOUSE

Super lobbyist, McCain donor and loathsome GOP figure Ed Rogers decided to talk to the Washington Post about Barack Obama last week:

John McCain's celebrity ad was effective. It wasn't uncontroversial and it didn't please all the political scientists, but it sure got noticed, and it made Barack Obama overreact. Questions about Obama's desire for celebrity status will linger. He now has to be very careful about intersecting with Hollywood, pop culture and entertainment. Lee Atwater said the worst thing you can do in American politics is play to your negative stereotype. Well, Obama's negative stereotype now includes the idea that he may be a little too glitzy. (Speaking of negative stereotypes, when Obama was talking about the pictures of presidents on dollar bills, was he introducing the presumptuous notion that his face belongs on American currency? I wonder whom he thinks he should replace.)


At least he was able to refrain from mentioning Obama's middle name while calling him "glitzy."

In other news, NBC has just completed the pilot for their new show, POWER HOUSE. In the first episode, we get to see how Ed Rogers and his wife live in their "Republican Shangri-La" -- an 18-thousand square foot estate in McLean, VA.



Looks just like my livingroom. We must have the same architect.



The genuine cowhide toilet-seat cover really says "I shit you not" with class. The golden studs around it aren't the least bit ostentatious.

And finally, we get to see why the lobbyists and hedonists with whom McCain has surrounded himself have proclaimed Americans to be a bunch of whiners:



That's right. She's standing in front of rows of her designer shoes cutting up sheets of freshly printed U.S. dollar bills with a pair of scissors so she can use them as wrapping paper.