Join the Discussion
NBC's Todd described McCain's support for the war as the "maverick thing to do"
On the March 28 edition of NBC's Today, NBC News political director Chuck Todd asserted: "It would be easy for" Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) "to criticize the war. The maverick thing to do is to actually take the unpopular stand." But, while McCain has supported President Bush's decision to increase U.S. troop levels in Iraq, he has also recently touted himself as "the greatest critic of the conduct of the war and one of the earliest," as Media Matters for America noted. Similarly, in a March 21 article, the Concord Monitor (New Hampshire) reported that McCain said, "I was the greatest critic of the way the war was being conducted." Moreover, McCain joined 45 of the 48 other Senate Republicans in voting to strike a provision in the Senate emergency military funding bill that Bush opposes, which says that Bush "shall commence the phased redeployment of United States forces from Iraq not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, with the goal of redeploying, by March 31, 2008." Bush called a similar provision in the House version of the bill an "an artificial timetable for withdrawal" and said he was "not going" to "accept" it. After the Senate vote, Bush announced that he was "disappointed."
Read more
Threaded Comments: on / off
Posted by AmericanMutt
McCower is as much a 'maverick' as dumbaya is a Texan.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:04:49 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by HuntingtonBeachLefty
McCAIN: What we must not do is to give up just at the moment we're starting to turn things around.
There's some intestinal fortitude.It would have been easy to win over Joe and Jane flag-waving meathead with the popular "giving up" position.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:08:05 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by soros in reply to HuntingtonBeachLefty
Yes, because McCain has such an excellent grasp on the situation in Iraq..
http://www.crooksandliars.com/Media/Download/15716/1/TSR-McCain-Ware.wmv
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:59:02 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking
"What we must not do is to give up just at the moment we're starting to turn things around."
I might have missed the news that things are turning around.
But then I just checked the news. Shiite revenge squads have only killed dozens of Sunnis today as opposed to hundreds .
I guess "The Maverick" was right, things are turning around, and around, and around.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:12:43 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by HuntingtonBeachLefty in reply to worrierking
King, it is possible that they've got another #2 Al Qaeda guy waiting in the wings. That usually signals a "turning around" point.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:23:56 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by worrierking in reply to HuntingtonBeachLefty
From what I've heard they have a very deep bullpen.
Not that I know the inner workings of their organization, Mr. Gonzales if you're monitoring this thread. Don't you have other things that you should be concerned with Alberto?
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:40:22 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by rusty shackleford in reply to worrierking
Remember how Gonzo was going to be our first hispanic Supreme Court justice? Now I'm thinking, maybe not so much.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:48:37 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by wookie in reply to worrierking
Sure things are turning around. They are bound to run out of things to blow up.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 4:08:18 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by draftedin68
"It would be easy for him to criticize the war."
Sorry, Charlie, but it wouldn't "be easy" at all.
It would be political suicide.
And Todd is the Political Director at NBC?
Sheesh!
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:36:44 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by greekfurnace in reply to draftedin68
Right. Exactly. In regard to the rest of the sentient world... McCain is being a 'maverick'. In regard to his handlers who ring the dinner bell... he's following in line as he always has.
Calling McCain a maverick is propaganda, plain and simple.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:44:42 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by bruce1ace
MMFA has taken the position that being known as a "maverick" is somehow a positive thing. At least they keep writing threads about it.
I wonder, does the public-at-large want the next President of the United States to have the nickname "Maverick"? Doesn't that promote the notion of unpredictability? That doesn't sound like a level-headed, clear thinking type of person that I want running the country. So really, does this nickname help McCain in the long run?
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:52:12 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Pragmatic Liberal in reply to bruce1ace
Actually, America likes their presidents to appear like mavericks in relation to tranditional Washington politics. This is exactly why, with the exception of Bush I, the presidents from Carter on have all been governors rather than "Washington insiders". So what's an actual mega-insider like McCain to do to combat this distaste for presidential candidates coming out of Congress? Brand yourself as a maverick who actually doesn't conform to the entrenched interests that so befuddles the average American.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 2:56:38 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by bruce1ace in reply to Pragmatic Liberal
That does make sense. So where did the term originate? Did McCain come up with it or was it given to him by the media?
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 3:00:24 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by greekfurnace in reply to bruce1ace
Look under Political Views in this Wiki piece. The suggestion is that McCain is considered a 'maverick' because he has opposed the Bush crew on several key issues. Frankly, considering how much pandering McCain does to Bush and the right-wing base... I think this is a bit of a fabrication meant to make McCain seem more 'mainstream' than he really is (or is allowed to be). But, that's my opinion.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 3:10:00 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by rusty shackleford in reply to bruce1ace
You make a valid point, Bruce, but think of it this way: what word would you use to describe the opposite of a "maverick"? And would that word be a flattering one to label a candidate?
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 3:02:31 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by bruce1ace in reply to rusty shackleford
That's a good point too!
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 3:42:32 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by steve k in reply to bruce1ace
By now most people understand that the Republicans are interested in only two things: lining their pockets, and the naked exercise of power. To counter this, the Repubs have to present all their candidates as "rebels," to convince voters that their candidate isn't a corrupt, authoritarian asshole like all those other Republicans. It makes no sense if you think about it, but let's face it--most people don't.
This isn't new. Remember, Bush was sold as a moderate, with all that talk of "compassionate conservatism" and "a uniter, not a divider," and look how he turned out. Calling McCain a "maverick" is just version 2.0 of this game.
And don't forget--"Maverick" was the name of Tom Cruise's character in Top Gun. That's gotta be worth at least a million votes.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 3:08:21 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by bruce1ace in reply to steve k
I guess the Republicans can thank Frank Luntz for soundbiting them into the majority.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 3:37:48 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by iflurry8094
So supporting unpopular things makes one a maverick? I support same sex marriage, who's calling me a maverick?
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 3:35:39 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by conleytgwinn in reply to iflurry8094
Nope - in the eyes of the Corporate Media (and coincidentally, the Repugnants) that indicts you as a co-conspirator in the "Gay Mafia". Look forward to having an FBI file as large, someday, as my own!
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 4:06:20 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by Pragmatic Liberal
Dateline Washington: In political news today, John McCain legally changed his name to Pete Mitchell. When asked about the change, McCain indicates that he'd always liked the name and felt the time was right to make the change. Critics have pointed out that Pete Mitchell is the name of the charismatic, renegade pilot with the call-sign 'Maverick' in the movie Top Gun. When asked about possible subliminal associations to the word 'Maverick', the senator formerly known as McCain called such talk as, "partisan cynicism". A spokesman for Rudy Guiliani's campaign had a different take, "It's a cry for help. Maverick's character in the movie Top Gun goes crazy from post-traumatic stress disorder. Actor Tom Cruise, also mentally ill, believes in Scientology. Mc...er...Mitchell spent years in the Hanoi Hilton. You connect the dots."
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 3:39:50 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by nerzog
Yessireee. It takes a lot of courage to pander to the Troglodytes who have your gonads in a jar. McCain has to secure the Non-thinkers' vote in order to get the Republicon nomination. Once that is achieved, he can maverick his way back toward the center.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 4:23:36 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by lgseiferth7479
John McCain has disintegrated, and it's fairly remarkable. There was a time when he would have made a great Republican candidate. Back in 2000, he was correct on a lot of issues. But since then, he has become, among other things, a fundamentalist kiss-a$$ and now a virtual clone of President Bush on the Iraq occupation. He has clearly lost his mind, now, when he tells 4 talk network talk shows that it's safe to walk around in Baghdad and the the chief general tooles around town in an SUV with no armor. He's off in lala land. On top of all this, the man is 70 years old! I think we are seeing the end of the political line for poor John McCain. I'm actually a little sad for him, because there was a time when I really liked him. That was 8 years ago when I lived in Arizona and he lived in reality.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 5:27:04 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by draftedin68
Ron, is that you?
More and more, I'm getting a serious vibe that Johnny's coming down with the same affliction that Ronnie experienced in the last years of his presidency.
You know - that condition where you make new friends every day?
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 5:27:39 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by HuntingtonBeachLefty in reply to draftedin68
I think that's a very appealing quality to many GOP voters, that perpetual "Morning in America", nothing happened before today sense of history. Might work for him.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 6:36:18 PM EDT / Flag this comment
Posted by MickD
Dang. These corporate networks have two choices: the audience that lets them set those big-time ad rates or the shareholder/GE/money masters who say keep pumping the war, despite what the majority of their audience says. It seems they've made their choice.
Posted Wednesday March 28, 2007 5:45:43 PM EDT / Flag this comment