Tue, Nov 28, 2006 4:45pm ET

Send to a friend Print Version

Join the Discussion

Kohn claimed Bill Clinton "didn't have his facts straight" during Fox News Sunday interview, but Kohn was the one misrepresenting the facts

Summary: Author Bob Kohn falsely claimed former President Bill Clinton "didn't have his facts straight" when he confronted Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday. But Kohn misstated Clinton's assertions to Wallace.
Read more

Video Clip

Trouble viewing clip? Download: QT | WMV

Threaded Comments: on / off

Post a new comment

You must be a registered user to post and flag comments on this site.
Please log in or sign up to post in this forum.

Posted by rusty shackleford

Too funny

This little right-wing tweedle questioning Clinton's command of facts. Bill would chew this punk up and spit him out any day of the week.

Posted by filkertom

They breathe, therefore they lie

The funny thing is how desperate they sound to assert their made-up "reality", the one voters rejected, over "actual" reality. Must be emotionally scarring to have Santa Claus not only exist but kick you in the crotch before he vanishes in a puff of logic.

Posted by filkertom in reply to filkertom

Sorry

Meant to say, "not only not exist".

Posted by Wes1

Chris Wallace and The Devil's Dictionary

Maybe Wallace adheres to Ambrose Bierce's definitions when it comes to asking questions of Bush failures. From TDD:

Once: Enough

Twice: Once too many.

Posted by conleytgwinn

Holy War!

Just as in jihad, it matters not who has the facts:

FoxLiesALOT is determined to "get" Clinton, and their imps are adequately sustained by these inept attempts.

Posted by tman418

Kohn the Con

Bill Clinton said to Chris Wallace why he didn't ask anyone in the Bush admin. why they didn't do anything about the USS Cole and why they fired Richard (Dick) Clarke, as well as why they didn't do more to put Al Qaida "out of business." By they way, when Wallace asked that question to Donald Rumsfeld, he let him answer without being confrontational. That is not what happened in the Rumsfeld interview.

Posted by Sagra

A tiny change would make the screencap

more accurate.

If you remove the quotes, it becomes

BOB KOHN

Author, Jouranistic Fraud

Posted by Sagra in reply to Sagra

Journalistic.

Not jumble-tastic.

Posted by HuntingtonBeachLefty in reply to Sagra

Don't sweat it, Sagra

we're just dirty little posters here, not professional jouranists.

Posted by snoopy

a new member of the phony express.

he'll ride that pony into the dirt too.

Posted by classicliberal2

Kohn

...or the other guest also claimed, during the course of this segment, that Bill Clinton's reaction, during that interview, was staged, a conclusion it's difficult to believe even the least intellectually honest Clinton-hater could honestly reach (the incident happened when Wallace violated the preestablished terms of the interview, Wallace claimed that Clinton fumed at his staff before leaving Fox, and Olbermann reported that Clinton was still fuming when he went over the MSNBC, immediately afterward).

More significantly, it's worth noting that last night's incident occured in the middle of a discussion of "liberal media bias" wherein the host and both guests were all conservatives, and that it occured on a right-wing program that was created as a replacement for MSNBC's only liberal show at that time, which had been cancelled because management didn't approve of the hosts' liberal views.

Posted by archae

Kohn is a clueless far-right idiot.

This is the same idiot who on that same broadcast whined about how "The Daily Show" isn't "fair and balanced."

Hey Kohn, "The Daily Show" is a *HUMOR* program, not news!

What a Kool-Aid drinking idiot.

Posted by wolf kotenberg

classic FOX methodology............

throw spitballs at a wall and see what sticks. This guy looks just right for Marine Corps boot camp and get real facts.

Posted by mefirst

could kohn have made a mistake

when he said march 22, 2006? nah, since he says it was "six months earlier" but gave the exact date, but wrong year, it was obviously an attempt to deflect away from the fact that one interview, which they constantly offer as proof of how rough they are on the bushies, was two and a half years ago. damn, boys, if you are going to talk about how fair and balanced you are, try not to be spreading more lying propaganda at the same time. kind of undermines your argument.

I actually saw this segment

and it was pretty funny, Actually debating whether Fox Nooz is "Republican Friendly".

And pointing out the bias of the Daily Show.

Here's the deal; Humor and satire generally are directed at hypocrisy and absurdity and the status quo. Conservatism and specifically our current leadership are pretty ripe targets, and funny as hell.

Same reason Mallard Fillmore and Rush Limbaugh are rarely funny. Defending the power structure and those in charge at the expense of average people is not a good foundation for humor.

Posted by rubdwrong7211

Humor

"Here's the deal; Humor and satire generally are directed at hypocrisy and absurdity and the status quo. Conservatism and specifically our current leadership are pretty ripe targets, and funny as hell."

Now that Pelosi and gang are in charge, we'll see if Jon Stewart dishes it out to them.

"Same reason Mallard Fillmore and Rush Limbaugh are rarely funny."

Rush is a Blowhard but Mallard Fillmore is priceless!

Posted by HuntingtonBeachLefty in reply to rubdwrong7211

Did you mean priceless or worthless?

Rush is a Blowhard but Mallard Fillmore is priceless!

- rubdwrong7211

Which Police Academy movies do you think are the great ones?

Posted by darkmass in reply to HuntingtonBeachLefty

He's not wrong...

"Mallard Fillmore is priceless!"

Mallard Fillmore is one of the most effective recruiting agents for Progressives.

Posted by HuntingtonBeachLefty in reply to darkmass

You could be right, darkmass

seeing ones ideology completely explained by a duck with a press pass in his hatband might embarrass some of the more salvageable cons into reality.

I do think Mallard Fillmore might gain some GOP votes though.Like maybe the people who call in to Rush Limbaugh and say megadittos- suppose they have a friend who can't keep up with Rush. They consider him too thoughtful,and don't have the attention span needed to survive an El Rushbo 10 minute tirade.

Now imagine these same people see a duck who's dressed up like a reporter,along with his foils (the liberal professor with the bifocals and bald on top with long grey hair, the oafish angry woman with the page-boy hair and the NOW button, the conventional wisdom brontosaurus).

I know it's hard to imagine, but I'll bet there are people in this great country of ours for whom Hannity and Rush haven't dumbed down world affairs and social issues enough.

Hello, Mallard Filmore!

Posted by rusty shackleford in reply to rubdwrong7211

...

Mallard Fillmore is priceless!

I agree. Not worth a nickel.

Posted by rubdwrong7211 in reply to rusty shackleford

What's so funny?

Mallard Fillmore is priceless! "I agree. Not worth a nickel." - rusty shackleford

You're entitled to your opinion. What do you think of Oliphant?

"Did you mean priceless or worthless? Which Police Academy movies do you think are the great ones?" -HuntingtonBeachLefty

I've never seen any movies called "Police Academy." I take it they're not very good. How much time have you spent watching them?

"Mallard Fillmore is one of the most effective recruiting agents for Progressives." - darkmass

"Progressives" are "recruited" via cartoons? Interesting.

Posted by Easy to refute wingnuts in reply to rubdwrong7211

Enlightenment

Well, now we know why rubdwrong7211 thinks "Mallard Fillmore" is priceless. His debating skills are on a second grade level (his entire post above is "I know you are, but what am I?"), so his humor level is there, also. "Fillmore" might be a bit below his grasp, but he tries.

Posted by rubdwrong7211 in reply to Easy to refute wingnuts

Easy to refute...

I'm afraid you're projecting again.

Posted by rusty shackleford in reply to rubdwrong7211

Oliphant

is good but Tom Toles is, in my opinion, the hands-down best political cartoonist working today.

Posted by rubdwrong7211 in reply to rusty shackleford

Toles

Toles is clever about 5% of the time. I guess he's OK if you like political cartoons with almost no thought put into them.

Posted by solon in reply to rubdwrong7211

No thought?

Wow, here is a clue, just because it is miles above your head doesnt mean no thought went into it, just that you arent bright enough to GET it. Thus you think Mallard Fillmore is actually funny.

Posted by rusty shackleford in reply to rubdwrong7211

rubdwrong

As a fan of Mallard Fillmore, your opinion on this topic has no validity. Thanks for playing though.

Posted by solon in reply to rusty shackleford

Gotta go with

Dan Perkins (Tom Tomorrow) with This Modern World.

Posted by HuntingtonBeachLefty in reply to solon

Good pick, Solon,

Modern World is one I emeail to my Repub ma-in-law often. Manages to get the point across without being TOO vicious, just funny.

Non-Sequitir is pretty good sometimes as well.

Sorry, can't respond to rubdwrong, thanks for doing it while I was gone.

Mallard Fillmore?

Posted by BLR in reply to rubdwrong7211

Of course TDS will pick on the new Congress...

they have picked at Democrats in the past, and they will pick at Democrats in the future.

The reason TDS has been heavy on the Republican-picking, IMO, is that they've been far more obvious about their idiocy and hypocrisy in the past few years.

I seem to remember a few years back, just before the 2000 election, and listening to a left-leaning cartoonist talk about the election during a presentation he was making at UC. He was asked by an audience member who he supported for the Presidential election. The cartoonist responded, "I'm torn on this. As a Progressive, I'd like to see a Democrat stay in the White House, but as a cartoonist, George Bush would give me great job security."

I have to think TDS & Stewart are in the same camp there.

Posted by steelydan

very good

Very good, MMFA. I saw the Scarborough program last night and Kohn's comment didn't smell right to me, either. I cast a jaundiced eye at anything this guy says.

Let's see if Scarborough makes a correction tonight.

Posted by njguy93

BOB KOHN

is the same troglodyte who said one night on Scarborough Country or some show on MSNBC "I dont know how you can think that Judith Miller is anything but anti-Bush." He has to be either delusional or dripping with dishonesty. Judith Miller is the one who wrote those stories about non-existent Weapons of Mass Destruction which helped make the case for war against Iraq. You have to be at the zenith of dishonesty to say that Judith Miller was "anti-Bush."

THANK YOU. njguy93@yahoo.com

Posted by jscott

I don't know is he's dishonest...

but he looks like one of them there A-rabs.